Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains
There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tess Hardy [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The journal of industrial relations - London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959, 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:57 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:563-584 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1177/0022185615582240 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1962254453 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1962254453 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215163013.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0022185615582240 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1962254453 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 83.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 85.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Tess Hardy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Regulatory agencies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Labor standards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Labor relations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supply chains | |
| 700 | 0 | |a John Howe |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of industrial relations |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 |g 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 |w (DE-627)129973084 |w (DE-600)410608-8 |w (DE-576)112814875 |x 0022-1856 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:563-584 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 83.00 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 85.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 57 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 563-584 | ||
| author_variant |
t h th |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00221856:2015----::hiratoataeiapoctadesnepomnnnopi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
83.00 85.00 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1177/0022185615582240 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Tess Hardy verfasserin aut Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains John Howe oth Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 (DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 0022-1856 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 83.00 AVZ 85.00 AVZ AR 57 2015 4 563-584 |
| spelling |
10.1177/0022185615582240 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Tess Hardy verfasserin aut Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains John Howe oth Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 (DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 0022-1856 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 83.00 AVZ 85.00 AVZ AR 57 2015 4 563-584 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1177/0022185615582240 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Tess Hardy verfasserin aut Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains John Howe oth Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 (DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 0022-1856 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 83.00 AVZ 85.00 AVZ AR 57 2015 4 563-584 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1177/0022185615582240 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Tess Hardy verfasserin aut Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains John Howe oth Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 (DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 0022-1856 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 83.00 AVZ 85.00 AVZ AR 57 2015 4 563-584 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1177/0022185615582240 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Tess Hardy verfasserin aut Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains John Howe oth Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 (DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 0022-1856 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 83.00 AVZ 85.00 AVZ AR 57 2015 4 563-584 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The journal of industrial relations 57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584 volume:57 year:2015 number:4 pages:563-584 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of industrial relations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tess Hardy @@aut@@ John Howe @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129973084 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC1962254453 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1962254453</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215163013.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0022185615582240</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1962254453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tess Hardy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regulatory agencies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Howe</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of industrial relations</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129973084</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)410608-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)112814875</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-1856</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:563-584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">563-584</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tess Hardy |
| spellingShingle |
Tess Hardy ddc 330 bkl 83.00 bkl 85.00 misc Studies misc Regulatory agencies misc Labor standards misc Labor relations misc Supply chains Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| authorStr |
Tess Hardy |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129973084 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0022-1856 |
| topic_title |
330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains Studies Regulatory agencies Labor standards Labor relations Supply chains |
| topic |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 bkl 85.00 misc Studies misc Regulatory agencies misc Labor standards misc Labor relations misc Supply chains |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 bkl 85.00 misc Studies misc Regulatory agencies misc Labor standards misc Labor relations misc Supply chains |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 bkl 85.00 misc Studies misc Regulatory agencies misc Labor standards misc Labor relations misc Supply chains |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
j h jh |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of industrial relations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129973084 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of industrial relations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129973084 (DE-600)410608-8 (DE-576)112814875 |
| title |
Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1962254453 (DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453 (PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0 (KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym |
| title_full |
Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| author_sort |
Tess Hardy |
| journal |
The journal of industrial relations |
| journalStr |
The journal of industrial relations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
563 |
| author_browse |
Tess Hardy |
| container_volume |
57 |
| class |
330 DNB 83.00 bkl 85.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tess Hardy |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1177/0022185615582240 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
chain reaction: a strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| title_auth |
Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| abstract |
There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. |
| abstractGer |
There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
John Howe |
| author2Str |
John Howe |
| ppnlink |
129973084 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1177/0022185615582240 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:08:31.953Z |
| _version_ |
1803616268534677504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1962254453</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215163013.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0022185615582240</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1962254453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1962254453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1525-51e9553d9cb4cb9f91e72e4f9d38350a9c645345c674c4265cb27153a10e6af0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0001316120150000057000400563chainreactionastrategicapproachtoaddressingemploym</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tess Hardy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chain reaction: A strategic approach to addressing employment noncompliance in complex supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is an emerging consensus that targeting the direct employer of workers in enforcement action may be both inefficient and ineffective in achieving compliance with employment standards. This article explores some new and innovative ways that the Australian employment standards enforcement agency -- the Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) -- has sought to address the problem of employment non-compliance in complex supply chains. In particular, we examine three distinct mechanisms used by the FWO, namely: supply chain litigation, enforceable undertakings and proactive compliance deeds. We argue that these initiatives illustrate the way in which regulatory agencies can better target their resources and maximise the general deterrence of enforcement action by focusing not only on the direct employer, but on those firms which are in a position to influence compliance behaviour more broadly.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regulatory agencies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Howe</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of industrial relations</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">57(2015), 4, Seite 563-584</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129973084</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)410608-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)112814875</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-1856</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:563-584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582240</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1700751622</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">563-584</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4006376 |