Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis
The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vess...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Riter, Leah S [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry - Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953, 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:63 ; year:2015 ; number:18 ; pages:4405 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963011821 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1963011821 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230518194834.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963011821 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |a 640 |a 540 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 58.27 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 58.34 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 42.63 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Riter, Leah S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Crops, Agricultural - chemistry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laboratories - standards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Food Contamination - analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pesticide Residues - analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lynn, Kari J |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wujcik, Chad E |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buchholz, Lisa M |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |d Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 |g 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 |w (DE-627)129602795 |w (DE-600)241619-0 |w (DE-576)015096610 |x 0021-8561 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:63 |g year:2015 |g number:18 |g pages:4405 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 58.27 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 58.34 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.63 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 63 |j 2015 |e 18 |h 4405 | ||
| author_variant |
l s r ls lsr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00218561:2015----::nelbrtrassmnocymligaperprto |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
58.27 58.34 42.63 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Riter, Leah S verfasserin aut Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis Lynn, Kari J oth Wujcik, Chad E oth Buchholz, Lisa M oth Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 (DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 0021-8561 nnns volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 58.27 AVZ 58.34 AVZ 42.63 AVZ AR 63 2015 18 4405 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Riter, Leah S verfasserin aut Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis Lynn, Kari J oth Wujcik, Chad E oth Buchholz, Lisa M oth Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 (DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 0021-8561 nnns volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 58.27 AVZ 58.34 AVZ 42.63 AVZ AR 63 2015 18 4405 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Riter, Leah S verfasserin aut Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis Lynn, Kari J oth Wujcik, Chad E oth Buchholz, Lisa M oth Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 (DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 0021-8561 nnns volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 58.27 AVZ 58.34 AVZ 42.63 AVZ AR 63 2015 18 4405 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Riter, Leah S verfasserin aut Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis Lynn, Kari J oth Wujcik, Chad E oth Buchholz, Lisa M oth Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 (DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 0021-8561 nnns volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 58.27 AVZ 58.34 AVZ 42.63 AVZ AR 63 2015 18 4405 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Riter, Leah S verfasserin aut Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis Lynn, Kari J oth Wujcik, Chad E oth Buchholz, Lisa M oth Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 (DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 0021-8561 nnns volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 58.27 AVZ 58.34 AVZ 42.63 AVZ AR 63 2015 18 4405 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 63(2015), 18, Seite 4405 volume:63 year:2015 number:18 pages:4405 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Riter, Leah S @@aut@@ Lynn, Kari J @@oth@@ Wujcik, Chad E @@oth@@ Buchholz, Lisa M @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129602795 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
OLC1963011821 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963011821</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518194834.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963011821</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.27</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.63</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riter, Leah S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratories - standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Contamination - analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticide Residues - analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lynn, Kari J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wujcik, Chad E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buchholz, Lisa M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953</subfield><subfield code="g">63(2015), 18, Seite 4405</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129602795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)241619-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015096610</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8561</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:63</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:18</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:4405</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.27</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.63</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">63</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">18</subfield><subfield code="h">4405</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Riter, Leah S |
| spellingShingle |
Riter, Leah S ddc 630 bkl 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 misc Crops, Agricultural - chemistry misc Laboratories - standards misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods misc Food Contamination - analysis misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards misc Pesticide Residues - analysis Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| authorStr |
Riter, Leah S |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129602795 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0021-8561 |
| topic_title |
630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis Crops, Agricultural - chemistry Laboratories - standards Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods Food Contamination - analysis Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards Pesticide Residues - analysis |
| topic |
ddc 630 bkl 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 misc Crops, Agricultural - chemistry misc Laboratories - standards misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods misc Food Contamination - analysis misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards misc Pesticide Residues - analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 bkl 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 misc Crops, Agricultural - chemistry misc Laboratories - standards misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods misc Food Contamination - analysis misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards misc Pesticide Residues - analysis |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 bkl 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 misc Crops, Agricultural - chemistry misc Laboratories - standards misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods misc Food Contamination - analysis misc Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards misc Pesticide Residues - analysis |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
k j l kj kjl c e w ce cew l m b lm lmb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129602795 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 540 - Chemistry |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129602795 (DE-600)241619-0 (DE-576)015096610 |
| title |
Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963011821 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821 (PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700 (KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar |
| title_full |
Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| author_sort |
Riter, Leah S |
| journal |
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| journalStr |
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
4405 |
| author_browse |
Riter, Leah S |
| container_volume |
63 |
| class |
630 640 540 DNB 58.27 bkl 58.34 bkl 42.63 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Riter, Leah S |
| dewey-full |
630 640 540 |
| title_sort |
interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| title_auth |
Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| abstract |
The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. |
| abstractGer |
The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4219 |
| container_issue |
18 |
| title_short |
Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis |
| url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Lynn, Kari J Wujcik, Chad E Buchholz, Lisa M |
| author2Str |
Lynn, Kari J Wujcik, Chad E Buchholz, Lisa M |
| ppnlink |
129602795 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:46:10.445Z |
| _version_ |
1803622411608784896 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963011821</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518194834.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963011821</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963011821</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p476-88979ed29cacaa88b13d07bca329e59edf00d263dd36b18bffb8497e9128b1700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0011841920150000063001804405interlaboratoryassessmentofcryomillingsampleprepar</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.27</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.63</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Riter, Leah S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interlaboratory assessment of cryomilling sample preparation for residue analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effectiveness of the comminution approach used for bulk field samples limits the size of the subsample that must be extracted and analyzed to ensure an adequately representative and reproducible measurement. In many cases this subsample size restricts the residue method to the use of larger vessel formats, limiting downstream throughput. The introduction of a secondary fine-milling step to this process using a subsample size already known to be representative can further improve sample homogeneity and allow direct method scaling to small high-throughput formats. Dramatic increases in method throughput can then be achieved through the simultaneous processing of numerous samples in parallel. This approach was evaluated across a diverse grouping of crop matrices using two substantially different pesticide types. Both fortified and field-collected samples demonstrated a high degree of precision and reproducibility across laboratories. Additional benefits of this approach include significant reductions in cost and solvent waste generation, as well as improvements in assay quality and transferability.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratories - standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Contamination - analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytic Sample Preparation Methods - standards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticide Residues - analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lynn, Kari J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wujcik, Chad E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buchholz, Lisa M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Columbus, Ohio : American Chemical Soc., 1953</subfield><subfield code="g">63(2015), 18, Seite 4405</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129602795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)241619-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015096610</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8561</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:63</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:18</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:4405</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.27</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.63</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">63</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">18</subfield><subfield code="h">4405</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3977556 |