Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules
Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Andrew Brown [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Computers & industrial engineering - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976, 88(2015), Seite 293-306 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:88 ; year:2015 ; pages:293-306 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963022440 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1963022440 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220217082838.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963022440 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |q DNB |
084 | |a 85.35 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 54.80 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 83.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 0 | |a Andrew Brown |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Route optimization | |
650 | 4 | |a Comparative studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Probability distribution | |
650 | 4 | |a Performance evaluation | |
650 | 4 | |a Job shops | |
650 | 4 | |a Production management | |
650 | 4 | |a Business metrics | |
700 | 0 | |a Stanko Dimitrov |4 oth | |
700 | 0 | |a Ada Y Barlatt |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Computers & industrial engineering |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 |g 88(2015), Seite 293-306 |w (DE-627)129448982 |w (DE-600)196993-6 |w (DE-576)014814994 |x 0360-8352 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:88 |g year:2015 |g pages:293-306 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 85.35 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 54.80 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 83.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 88 |j 2015 |h 293-306 |
author_variant |
a b ab |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:03608352:2015----::otndsrbtosntermatn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
85.35 54.80 83.00 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Andrew Brown verfasserin aut Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics Stanko Dimitrov oth Ada Y Barlatt oth Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 88(2015), Seite 293-306 (DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 0360-8352 nnns volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 85.35 AVZ 54.80 AVZ 83.00 AVZ AR 88 2015 293-306 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Andrew Brown verfasserin aut Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics Stanko Dimitrov oth Ada Y Barlatt oth Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 88(2015), Seite 293-306 (DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 0360-8352 nnns volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 85.35 AVZ 54.80 AVZ 83.00 AVZ AR 88 2015 293-306 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Andrew Brown verfasserin aut Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics Stanko Dimitrov oth Ada Y Barlatt oth Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 88(2015), Seite 293-306 (DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 0360-8352 nnns volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 85.35 AVZ 54.80 AVZ 83.00 AVZ AR 88 2015 293-306 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Andrew Brown verfasserin aut Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics Stanko Dimitrov oth Ada Y Barlatt oth Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 88(2015), Seite 293-306 (DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 0360-8352 nnns volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 85.35 AVZ 54.80 AVZ 83.00 AVZ AR 88 2015 293-306 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Andrew Brown verfasserin aut Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics Stanko Dimitrov oth Ada Y Barlatt oth Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976 88(2015), Seite 293-306 (DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 0360-8352 nnns volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 85.35 AVZ 54.80 AVZ 83.00 AVZ AR 88 2015 293-306 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering 88(2015), Seite 293-306 volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Computers & industrial engineering 88(2015), Seite 293-306 volume:88 year:2015 pages:293-306 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics |
dewey-raw |
004 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Computers & industrial engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Andrew Brown @@aut@@ Stanko Dimitrov @@oth@@ Ada Y Barlatt @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129448982 |
dewey-sort |
14 |
id |
OLC1963022440 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963022440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217082838.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963022440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andrew Brown</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Route optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Probability distribution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Job shops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Production management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Business metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanko Dimitrov</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ada Y Barlatt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Computers & industrial engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">88(2015), Seite 293-306</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129448982</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)196993-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014814994</subfield><subfield code="x">0360-8352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:88</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:293-306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">88</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">293-306</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Andrew Brown |
spellingShingle |
Andrew Brown ddc 004 bkl 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 misc Route optimization misc Comparative studies misc Probability distribution misc Performance evaluation misc Job shops misc Production management misc Business metrics Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
authorStr |
Andrew Brown |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129448982 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0360-8352 |
topic_title |
004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules Route optimization Comparative studies Probability distribution Performance evaluation Job shops Production management Business metrics |
topic |
ddc 004 bkl 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 misc Route optimization misc Comparative studies misc Probability distribution misc Performance evaluation misc Job shops misc Production management misc Business metrics |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 bkl 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 misc Route optimization misc Comparative studies misc Probability distribution misc Performance evaluation misc Job shops misc Production management misc Business metrics |
topic_browse |
ddc 004 bkl 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 misc Route optimization misc Comparative studies misc Probability distribution misc Performance evaluation misc Job shops misc Production management misc Business metrics |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
s d sd a y b ayb |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Computers & industrial engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129448982 |
dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
hierarchy_top_title |
Computers & industrial engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129448982 (DE-600)196993-6 (DE-576)014814994 |
title |
Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963022440 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440 (PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40 (KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules |
title_full |
Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
author_sort |
Andrew Brown |
journal |
Computers & industrial engineering |
journalStr |
Computers & industrial engineering |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
293 |
author_browse |
Andrew Brown |
container_volume |
88 |
class |
004 DNB 85.35 bkl 54.80 bkl 83.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Andrew Brown |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 |
dewey-full |
004 |
title_sort |
routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
title_auth |
Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
abstract |
Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. |
abstractGer |
Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 |
title_short |
Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Stanko Dimitrov Ada Y Barlatt |
author2Str |
Stanko Dimitrov Ada Y Barlatt |
ppnlink |
129448982 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:48:01.214Z |
_version_ |
1803622527750111232 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963022440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217082838.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963022440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963022440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2812-2bf48757f0b3edde91211e3b89c3eaf3d878b03289776f360d0168e29e6c2bb40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0011885020150000088000000293routingdistributionsandtheirimpactondispatchrules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andrew Brown</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Routing distributions and their impact on dispatch rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Motivated by the job-shop production process of our industry partner, we examine dispatching rules effects on two key performance indicators (KPIs) -- job lateness and the percentage of late jobs. In the literature, authors use the uniform distribution to generate random job shop data. In addition to our discussion on dispatching rules, we propose an alternative idea for random job shop data, the routing distribution, and we compare dispatching rules performance using KPI frontiers under different routing distributions. We show that using their current dispatch rule, earliest operation due date (EODD), the industry partner is never worse off, even as their job-shop's operational environment changes. We further show that using multiple dispatch rules across several job-shop departments does improve a job-shop's performance on the KPIs, though the improvement is small and in some cases may not be statistically significant. In addition, we find that EODD is one of several dispatching rule which consistently lie on the KPI frontier for different job routing distributions. We find that dispatching rule performance is greatly affected by the routing distribution of the job-shop where the rules are employed. Lastly, we leave the readers with some insight into determining which dispatch rules and routing distributions should be considered for different job shops.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Route optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Probability distribution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Job shops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Production management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Business metrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanko Dimitrov</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ada Y Barlatt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Computers & industrial engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">88(2015), Seite 293-306</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129448982</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)196993-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014814994</subfield><subfield code="x">0360-8352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:88</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:293-306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1713974913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.35</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">88</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">293-306</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4005013 |