Campbell at 21/Sony at 31
When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Co...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jessica Litman [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Washington law review - Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919, 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:90 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:651 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963042646 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1963042646 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714160526.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963042646 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DNB |
| 100 | 0 | |a Jessica Litman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use (Copyright) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Copyright | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Influence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Federal court decisions | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Washington law review |d Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 |g 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 |w (DE-627)16724891X |w (DE-600)435060-1 |w (DE-576)015589986 |x 0043-0617 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:651 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2062 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 90 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 651 | ||
| author_variant |
j l jl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00430617:2015----::apelt1o |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Jessica Litman verfasserin aut Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 651 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Jessica Litman verfasserin aut Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 651 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Jessica Litman verfasserin aut Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 651 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Jessica Litman verfasserin aut Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 651 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Jessica Litman verfasserin aut Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 651 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 651 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:651 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Washington law review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jessica Litman @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1963042646 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042646</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jessica Litman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campbell at 21/Sony at 31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Influence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 651</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">651</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jessica Litman |
| spellingShingle |
Jessica Litman ddc 340 misc Analysis misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Influence misc Fair use misc Federal court decisions Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| authorStr |
Jessica Litman |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)16724891X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0043-0617 |
| topic_title |
340 DNB Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 Analysis Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Influence Fair use Federal court decisions |
| topic |
ddc 340 misc Analysis misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Influence misc Fair use misc Federal court decisions |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 misc Analysis misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Influence misc Fair use misc Federal court decisions |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 misc Analysis misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Influence misc Fair use misc Federal court decisions |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Washington law review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Washington law review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 |
| title |
Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963042646 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646 (PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31 |
| title_full |
Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| author_sort |
Jessica Litman |
| journal |
Washington law review |
| journalStr |
Washington law review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
651 |
| author_browse |
Jessica Litman |
| container_volume |
90 |
| class |
340 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jessica Litman |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
campbell at 21/sony at 31 |
| title_auth |
Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| abstract |
When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. |
| abstractGer |
When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Campbell at 21/Sony at 31 |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
16724891X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:50:27.138Z |
| _version_ |
1803622680761466880 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042646</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g749-5e3864401769b4a60115d7c313763da4545f73c4bc4369a91b0a31137c1b30eb0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200651campbellat21sonyat31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jessica Litman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campbell at 21/Sony at 31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">When copyright lawyers gather to discuss fair use, the most common refrain is its alarming expansion. Their distress about fair use's enlarged footprint seems completely untethered from any appreciation of the remarkable increase in exclusive copyright rights. In the nearly forty years since Congress enacted the 1976 copyright act, the rights of copyright owners have expanded markedly. Copyright owners' demands for further expansion continue unabated. Meanwhile, they raise strident objections to proposals to add new privileges and exceptions to the statute to shelter non-infringing uses that might be implicated by their expanded rights. Copyright owners have used the resulting uncertainty over the scope of liability for new uses to litigate some new businesses into bankruptcy before their legality could be determined. These developments push fair use to shelter new uses and users. When lawyers for copyright owners complain that fair use has stretched beyond their expectations, they fail to acknowledge their own responsibility for its growth. This Article takes up these questions with particular attention to the thirty-one-year-old decision in Sony v. Universal Studios, and Congress's assumptions about individual and contributory liability for personal copying before and after the Sony case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Influence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 651</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">651</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005013 |