Content, purpose, or both?
Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Rebecca Tushnet [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Washington law review - Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919, 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:90 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:869 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963042662 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1963042662 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714160526.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963042662 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DNB |
| 100 | 0 | |a Rebecca Tushnet |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Content, purpose, or both? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Derivative works (Copyright) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laws, regulations and rules | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use (Copyright) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Copyright | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supreme Court decisions | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Washington law review |d Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 |g 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 |w (DE-627)16724891X |w (DE-600)435060-1 |w (DE-576)015589986 |x 0043-0617 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:869 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2062 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 90 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 869 | ||
| author_variant |
r t rt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00430617:2015----::otnproe |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Rebecca Tushnet verfasserin aut Content, purpose, or both? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 869 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Rebecca Tushnet verfasserin aut Content, purpose, or both? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 869 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Rebecca Tushnet verfasserin aut Content, purpose, or both? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 869 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Rebecca Tushnet verfasserin aut Content, purpose, or both? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 869 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Rebecca Tushnet verfasserin aut Content, purpose, or both? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 869 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 869 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:869 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Washington law review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Rebecca Tushnet @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1963042662 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042662</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rebecca Tushnet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Content, purpose, or both?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Derivative works (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 869</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">869</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Rebecca Tushnet |
| spellingShingle |
Rebecca Tushnet ddc 340 misc Derivative works (Copyright) misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions Content, purpose, or both? |
| authorStr |
Rebecca Tushnet |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)16724891X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0043-0617 |
| topic_title |
340 DNB Content, purpose, or both? Derivative works (Copyright) Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Fair use (Copyright) Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions |
| topic |
ddc 340 misc Derivative works (Copyright) misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 misc Derivative works (Copyright) misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 misc Derivative works (Copyright) misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Washington law review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Washington law review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 |
| title |
Content, purpose, or both? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963042662 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662 (PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth |
| title_full |
Content, purpose, or both? |
| author_sort |
Rebecca Tushnet |
| journal |
Washington law review |
| journalStr |
Washington law review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
869 |
| author_browse |
Rebecca Tushnet |
| container_volume |
90 |
| class |
340 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Rebecca Tushnet |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
content, purpose, or both? |
| title_auth |
Content, purpose, or both? |
| abstract |
Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. |
| abstractGer |
Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Content, purpose, or both? |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
16724891X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:50:27.319Z |
| _version_ |
1803622680958599168 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042662</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g741-e01d352697f9a1d3b7ce8669bfe14f54b2b0b9cef18f6dc05083a6c91047972a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200869contentpurposeorboth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rebecca Tushnet</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Content, purpose, or both?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Most debates about the proper meaning of "transformativeness" in fair use are really about a larger shift towards more robust fair use. Part I of this short Article explores the copyright-restrictionist turn towards defending fair use, whereas in the past critics of copyright's broad scope were more likely to argue that fair use was too fragile to protect free speech and creativity in the digital age. Part II looks at some of the major cases supporting that rhetorical and political shift. Although it hasn't broken decisively with the past, current case law makes more salient the freedoms many types of uses and users have to proceed without copyright owners' authorization. Part III discusses some of the strongest critics of liberal fair use interpretations, especially their arguments that transformative "purpose" is an illegitimate category. Part IV looks towards the future, suggesting that broad understandings of transformativeness are here to stay.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Derivative works (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 869</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712244161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">869</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998213 |