Campbell as fair use blueprint?
Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it gu...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pierre N Leval [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Washington law review - Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919, 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:90 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:597 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963042700 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1963042700 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714160526.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963042700 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DNB |
| 100 | 0 | |a Pierre N Leval |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use (Copyright) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Copyright | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fair use | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supreme Court decisions | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Washington law review |d Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 |g 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 |w (DE-627)16724891X |w (DE-600)435060-1 |w (DE-576)015589986 |x 0043-0617 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:597 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2062 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 90 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 597 | ||
| author_variant |
p n l pnl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00430617:2015----::apelsarsb |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Pierre N Leval verfasserin aut Campbell as fair use blueprint? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 597 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Pierre N Leval verfasserin aut Campbell as fair use blueprint? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 597 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Pierre N Leval verfasserin aut Campbell as fair use blueprint? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 597 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Pierre N Leval verfasserin aut Campbell as fair use blueprint? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 597 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB Pierre N Leval verfasserin aut Campbell as fair use blueprint? 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions Enthalten in Washington law review Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 (DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 0043-0617 nnns volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 AR 90 2015 2 597 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Washington law review 90(2015), 2, Seite 597 volume:90 year:2015 number:2 pages:597 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Washington law review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pierre N Leval @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1963042700 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierre N Leval</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campbell as fair use blueprint?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 597</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">597</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pierre N Leval |
| spellingShingle |
Pierre N Leval ddc 340 misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Models misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| authorStr |
Pierre N Leval |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)16724891X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0043-0617 |
| topic_title |
340 DNB Campbell as fair use blueprint? Fair use (Copyright) Models Copyright Fair use Supreme Court decisions |
| topic |
ddc 340 misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Models misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Models misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 misc Fair use (Copyright) misc Models misc Copyright misc Fair use misc Supreme Court decisions |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Washington law review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
16724891X |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Washington law review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)16724891X (DE-600)435060-1 (DE-576)015589986 |
| title |
Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963042700 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700 (PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0 (KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint |
| title_full |
Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| author_sort |
Pierre N Leval |
| journal |
Washington law review |
| journalStr |
Washington law review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
597 |
| author_browse |
Pierre N Leval |
| container_volume |
90 |
| class |
340 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pierre N Leval |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| title_auth |
Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| abstract |
Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. |
| abstractGer |
Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_2062 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Campbell as fair use blueprint? |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
16724891X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:50:27.600Z |
| _version_ |
1803622681245908992 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963042700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714160526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963042700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963042700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g742-eb9aeb90dc0eb06ba90a6d8f9298f8fd1c16a47d631b7ec47b68ee1a752d1c9a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012302120150000090000200597campbellasfairuseblueprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierre N Leval</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campbell as fair use blueprint?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biased or not, the author submits Campbell is a beautifully reasoned opinion, which has demonstrated in its twenty-one years that it provides a healthy framework for fair use analysis. That framework promotes the overall objectives of copyright; it protects the interests of rights holders; and it guards against putting manacles upon science. The confusion in the law was due, in no small part, to careless utterances by the High Court. The Court needlessly floated a number of unhelpful, distracting, counterproductive propositions, which had no bearing on the outcome of the particular case and have caused no end of confusion and harm. First, in Sony Corp of America v. Universal City Studios Inc, in gratuitous dictum, the Supreme Court declared that every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair use. In Harper & Row Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court rejected The Nation's claim that its taking of President Ford's explanation of the Nixon pardon was fair use because it was so newsworthy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Washington Law Review Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use (Copyright)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Copyright</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair use</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supreme Court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Washington law review</subfield><subfield code="d">Seattle, Wash. : Univ. of Washington, School of Law, 1919</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2015), 2, Seite 597</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)16724891X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435060-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015589986</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-0617</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1712243912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">597</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3992968 |