Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice
Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the sta...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Cronk, Ryan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of hygiene and environmental health - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000, 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:218 ; year:2015 ; number:8 ; pages:694-703 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963364503 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1963364503 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230513155019.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963364503 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DNB |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |q AVZ |
| 084 | |a 44.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.11 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cronk, Ryan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Slaymaker, Tom |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bartram, Jamie |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of hygiene and environmental health |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 |g 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 |w (DE-627)311678963 |w (DE-600)2009176-X |w (DE-576)090894839 |x 1438-4639 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:218 |g year:2015 |g number:8 |g pages:694-703 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_183 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2414 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.13 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.11 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 218 |j 2015 |e 8 |h 694-703 | ||
| author_variant |
r c rc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14384639:2015----::oioigrnigaesnttoadyininnoshlstigpi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
44.13 44.11 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Cronk, Ryan verfasserin aut Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Slaymaker, Tom oth Bartram, Jamie oth Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 (DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 1438-4639 nnns volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 44.13 AVZ 44.11 AVZ AR 218 2015 8 694-703 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Cronk, Ryan verfasserin aut Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Slaymaker, Tom oth Bartram, Jamie oth Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 (DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 1438-4639 nnns volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 44.13 AVZ 44.11 AVZ AR 218 2015 8 694-703 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Cronk, Ryan verfasserin aut Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Slaymaker, Tom oth Bartram, Jamie oth Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 (DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 1438-4639 nnns volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 44.13 AVZ 44.11 AVZ AR 218 2015 8 694-703 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Cronk, Ryan verfasserin aut Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Slaymaker, Tom oth Bartram, Jamie oth Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 (DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 1438-4639 nnns volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 44.13 AVZ 44.11 AVZ AR 218 2015 8 694-703 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Cronk, Ryan verfasserin aut Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Slaymaker, Tom oth Bartram, Jamie oth Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 (DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 1438-4639 nnns volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 44.13 AVZ 44.11 AVZ AR 218 2015 8 694-703 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of hygiene and environmental health 218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703 volume:218 year:2015 number:8 pages:694-703 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cronk, Ryan @@aut@@ Slaymaker, Tom @@oth@@ Bartram, Jamie @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
311678963 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
OLC1963364503 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963364503</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230513155019.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963364503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cronk, Ryan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Slaymaker, Tom</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bartram, Jamie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of hygiene and environmental health</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)311678963</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009176-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090894839</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-4639</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:218</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:694-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.11</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">218</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">694-703</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Cronk, Ryan |
| spellingShingle |
Cronk, Ryan ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 44.13 bkl 44.11 Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| authorStr |
Cronk, Ryan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)311678963 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1438-4639 |
| topic_title |
610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 44.13 bkl 44.11 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 44.13 bkl 44.11 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 333.7 bkl 44.13 bkl 44.11 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
t s ts j b jb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
311678963 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)311678963 (DE-600)2009176-X (DE-576)090894839 |
| title |
Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963364503 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503 (PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230 (KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho |
| title_full |
Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| author_sort |
Cronk, Ryan |
| journal |
International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
| journalStr |
International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
694 |
| author_browse |
Cronk, Ryan |
| container_volume |
218 |
| class |
610 DNB 333.7 AVZ 44.13 bkl 44.11 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Cronk, Ryan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 |
| dewey-full |
610 333.7 |
| title_sort |
monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: priorities for policy and practice |
| title_auth |
Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| abstract |
Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. |
| abstractGer |
Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_183 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2414 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 |
| container_issue |
8 |
| title_short |
Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Slaymaker, Tom Bartram, Jamie |
| author2Str |
Slaymaker, Tom Bartram, Jamie |
| ppnlink |
311678963 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:34:38.506Z |
| _version_ |
1803625460923367424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963364503</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230513155019.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963364503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963364503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1274-f46fdd6b2f375edfd1f2fd25dcad006ae0c6360d1c4221c9556cf1fa2c0756230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0016084920150000218000800694monitoringdrinkingwatersanitationandhygieneinnonho</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cronk, Ryan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Slaymaker, Tom</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bartram, Jamie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of hygiene and environmental health</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">218(2015), 8, Seite 694-703</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)311678963</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009176-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090894839</subfield><subfield code="x">1438-4639</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:218</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:694-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25836758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.11</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">218</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">694-703</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400284 |