Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi
Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach –...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Mapulanga, Patrick [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Systematik: |
|
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Library review - Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927, 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:64 ; year:2015 ; number:1/2 ; pages:101-117 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1963886933 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1963886933 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220216094450.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1963886933 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 020 |q DNB |
084 | |a AN 10100 |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 06.00 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 06.01 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 06.42 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mapulanga, Patrick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited | ||
650 | 4 | |a Information behaviour & retrieval | |
650 | 4 | |a Information in society | |
650 | 4 | |a Library & information science | |
650 | 4 | |a Public officials | |
650 | 4 | |a Internet resources | |
650 | 4 | |a Trade barriers | |
650 | 4 | |a Purchasing | |
650 | 4 | |a Construction contracts | |
650 | 4 | |a Corruption | |
650 | 4 | |a Malawi | |
650 | 4 | |a Legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Book reviews | |
650 | 4 | |a Academic libraries | |
650 | 4 | |a Library collections | |
650 | 4 | |a Suppliers | |
650 | 4 | |a Library materials | |
650 | 4 | |a Services | |
650 | 4 | |a Government purchasing | |
650 | 4 | |a Laws, regulations and rules | |
650 | 4 | |a Usage | |
650 | 4 | |a University and college libraries | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Library review |d Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 |g 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 |w (DE-627)130473634 |w (DE-600)748448-3 |w (DE-576)098614037 |x 0024-2535 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2015 |g number:1/2 |g pages:101-117 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
936 | r | v | |a AN 10100 |
936 | b | k | |a 06.00 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 06.01 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 06.42 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 64 |j 2015 |e 1/2 |h 101-117 |
author_variant |
p m pm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00242535:2015----::ulcrcrmnlgsainntecustoolbayaeilia |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
06.00 06.01 06.42 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Mapulanga, Patrick verfasserin aut Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries Enthalten in Library review Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 (DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 0024-2535 nnns volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 AN 10100 06.00 AVZ 06.01 AVZ 06.42 AVZ AR 64 2015 1/2 101-117 |
spelling |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Mapulanga, Patrick verfasserin aut Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries Enthalten in Library review Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 (DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 0024-2535 nnns volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 AN 10100 06.00 AVZ 06.01 AVZ 06.42 AVZ AR 64 2015 1/2 101-117 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Mapulanga, Patrick verfasserin aut Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries Enthalten in Library review Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 (DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 0024-2535 nnns volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 AN 10100 06.00 AVZ 06.01 AVZ 06.42 AVZ AR 64 2015 1/2 101-117 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Mapulanga, Patrick verfasserin aut Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries Enthalten in Library review Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 (DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 0024-2535 nnns volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 AN 10100 06.00 AVZ 06.01 AVZ 06.42 AVZ AR 64 2015 1/2 101-117 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Mapulanga, Patrick verfasserin aut Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries Enthalten in Library review Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 (DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 0024-2535 nnns volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 AN 10100 06.00 AVZ 06.01 AVZ 06.42 AVZ AR 64 2015 1/2 101-117 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Library review 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Library review 64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117 volume:64 year:2015 number:1/2 pages:101-117 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries |
dewey-raw |
020 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Library review |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mapulanga, Patrick @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130473634 |
dewey-sort |
220 |
id |
OLC1963886933 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963886933</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216094450.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963886933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">020</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AN 10100</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.01</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.42</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mapulanga, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information behaviour & retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information in society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library & information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public officials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internet resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade barriers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Purchasing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Construction contracts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Malawi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Book reviews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Academic libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library collections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Suppliers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library materials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government purchasing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Usage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">University and college libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Library review</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130473634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)748448-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098614037</subfield><subfield code="x">0024-2535</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1/2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:101-117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">AN 10100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.01</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.42</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1/2</subfield><subfield code="h">101-117</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Mapulanga, Patrick |
spellingShingle |
Mapulanga, Patrick ddc 020 rvk AN 10100 bkl 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 misc Information behaviour & retrieval misc Information in society misc Library & information science misc Public officials misc Internet resources misc Trade barriers misc Purchasing misc Construction contracts misc Corruption misc Malawi misc Legislation misc Book reviews misc Academic libraries misc Library collections misc Suppliers misc Library materials misc Services misc Government purchasing misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Usage misc University and college libraries Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
authorStr |
Mapulanga, Patrick |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130473634 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
020 - Library & information sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0024-2535 |
topic_title |
020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi Information behaviour & retrieval Information in society Library & information science Public officials Internet resources Trade barriers Purchasing Construction contracts Corruption Malawi Legislation Book reviews Academic libraries Library collections Suppliers Library materials Services Government purchasing Laws, regulations and rules Usage University and college libraries |
topic |
ddc 020 rvk AN 10100 bkl 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 misc Information behaviour & retrieval misc Information in society misc Library & information science misc Public officials misc Internet resources misc Trade barriers misc Purchasing misc Construction contracts misc Corruption misc Malawi misc Legislation misc Book reviews misc Academic libraries misc Library collections misc Suppliers misc Library materials misc Services misc Government purchasing misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Usage misc University and college libraries |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 020 rvk AN 10100 bkl 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 misc Information behaviour & retrieval misc Information in society misc Library & information science misc Public officials misc Internet resources misc Trade barriers misc Purchasing misc Construction contracts misc Corruption misc Malawi misc Legislation misc Book reviews misc Academic libraries misc Library collections misc Suppliers misc Library materials misc Services misc Government purchasing misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Usage misc University and college libraries |
topic_browse |
ddc 020 rvk AN 10100 bkl 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 misc Information behaviour & retrieval misc Information in society misc Library & information science misc Public officials misc Internet resources misc Trade barriers misc Purchasing misc Construction contracts misc Corruption misc Malawi misc Legislation misc Book reviews misc Academic libraries misc Library collections misc Suppliers misc Library materials misc Services misc Government purchasing misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Usage misc University and college libraries |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Library review |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130473634 |
dewey-tens |
020 - Library & information sciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Library review |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130473634 (DE-600)748448-3 (DE-576)098614037 |
title |
Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1963886933 (DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933 (PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0 (KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib |
title_full |
Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
author_sort |
Mapulanga, Patrick |
journal |
Library review |
journalStr |
Library review |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
101 |
author_browse |
Mapulanga, Patrick |
container_volume |
64 |
class |
020 DNB AN 10100 AVZ rvk 06.00 bkl 06.01 bkl 06.42 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Mapulanga, Patrick |
doi_str_mv |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 |
dewey-full |
020 |
title_sort |
public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in malawi |
title_auth |
Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
abstract |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. |
abstractGer |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_4012 |
container_issue |
1/2 |
title_short |
Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
130473634 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T06:43:40.507Z |
_version_ |
1803629804129353728 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1963886933</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216094450.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1963886933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1963886933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2650-9dc33708a6646e91e228f0971de01e1ad80bdf364b5b18fd9d35976d753c7eed0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0023100220150000064000100101publicprocurementlegislationandtheacquisitionoflib</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">020</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AN 10100</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.01</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">06.42</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mapulanga, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public procurement legislation and the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries in Malawi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to examine the challenges and opportunities the new public procurement legislation has created for academic librarians as regards the acquisition of library materials in academic libraries (university/college libraries) in Malawi. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a multi-method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires. The questionnaires were sent online to the university/college libraries of seven major accredited public universities in Malawi. After an initial analysis of that data, qualitative data on patterns were obtained through a mailing listserve with all the possible 19 librarians. Responses were analysed and categorised using a thematic approach. Findings – Academic libraries (university/college libraries) are involved in the internal procurement committees. Librarians are represented in internal procurement committees, though their representation differs from one institution to another. All the academic libraries (university/college libraries) either use the centralised or independent procurement methods. As a result, the public university libraries deal with agents as independents. Working as independents has negatively affected the libraries, as materials are procured at different prices and sometimes at higher prices, thereby ignoring the value for money. Research limitations/implications – In academic libraries, the library consortia have pulled resources towards a basket fund for wide access and cheaper licensing. However, for print library materials, a collaborative procurement process in which the academic libraries identify an agent capable of achieving a supplier list and then purchase directly from the preferred suppliers seems not to have been tried in the most developing countries. Practical implications – The study suggests that academic libraries (university/college libraries) should emulate the library consortia approach when dealing with agents. The academic libraries should consider collaborative procurement models as a means of procuring library materials. Originality/value – Since the enactment of the public procurement legislation in Malawi, no research has been documented on the challenges and opportunities the public procurement act and the acquisition of library materials. This research seeks to bridge the literature gap.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information behaviour & retrieval</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information in society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library & information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public officials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internet resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade barriers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Purchasing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Construction contracts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Malawi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Book reviews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Academic libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library collections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Suppliers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library materials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government purchasing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Usage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">University and college libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Library review</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald Publ. Group, 1927</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2015), 1/2, Seite 101-117</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130473634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)748448-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098614037</subfield><subfield code="x">0024-2535</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1/2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:101-117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-0047</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651370604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">AN 10100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.01</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">06.42</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1/2</subfield><subfield code="h">101-117</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399255 |