Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques

This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push str...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Varcin, Lynn [verfasserIn] Claus, Andrew van den Hoorn, Wolbert Hodges, Paul

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014

Schlagwörter:	training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Ergonomics - London : Taylor & Francis, 1957, 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:58 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:268-277

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586

Katalog-ID:	OLC1964151562

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1964151562
003	DE-627
005	20220219172600.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1964151562
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562
035			\|a (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170
035			\|a (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 650 \|q DNB
084			\|a 44.12 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 85.52 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Varcin, Lynn \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014
650		4	\|a training
650		4	\|a squat
650		4	\|a perceived effort
650		4	\|a push
650		4	\|a patient handling
650		4	\|a Kinematics
650		4	\|a Success factors
650		4	\|a Variance analysis
650		4	\|a Movement
650		4	\|a Ergonomics
700	1		\|a Claus, Andrew \|4 oth
700	1		\|a van den Hoorn, Wolbert \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Hodges, Paul \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Ergonomics \|d London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 \|g 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 \|w (DE-627)129070637 \|w (DE-600)1920-3 \|w (DE-576)014402556 \|x 0014-0139 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:58 \|g year:2015 \|g number:2 \|g pages:268-277
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586
856	4	2	\|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-SPO
912			\|a SSG-OPC-FOR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4314
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4598
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.12 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 85.52 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 58 \|j 2015 \|e 2 \|h 268-277

Indexfelder

author_variant	l v lv
matchkey_str	article:00140139:2015----::auladigifrneiprevdfotucsrtadieaisewetre
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	44.12 85.52
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Varcin, Lynn verfasserin aut Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics Claus, Andrew oth van den Hoorn, Wolbert oth Hodges, Paul oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 2 268-277
spelling	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Varcin, Lynn verfasserin aut Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics Claus, Andrew oth van den Hoorn, Wolbert oth Hodges, Paul oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 2 268-277
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Varcin, Lynn verfasserin aut Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics Claus, Andrew oth van den Hoorn, Wolbert oth Hodges, Paul oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 2 268-277
allfieldsGer	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Varcin, Lynn verfasserin aut Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics Claus, Andrew oth van den Hoorn, Wolbert oth Hodges, Paul oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 2 268-277
allfieldsSound	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Varcin, Lynn verfasserin aut Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics Claus, Andrew oth van den Hoorn, Wolbert oth Hodges, Paul oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 2 268-277
language	English
source	Enthalten in Ergonomics 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277
sourceStr	Enthalten in Ergonomics 58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277 volume:58 year:2015 number:2 pages:268-277
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics
dewey-raw	650
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Ergonomics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Varcin, Lynn @@aut@@ Claus, Andrew @@oth@@ van den Hoorn, Wolbert @@oth@@ Hodges, Paul @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129070637
dewey-sort	3650
id	OLC1964151562
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964151562</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172600.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964151562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varcin, Lynn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">training</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">squat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">perceived effort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">push</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient handling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kinematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Success factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Variance analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Movement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Claus, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van den Hoorn, Wolbert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hodges, Paul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:268-277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">268-277</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Varcin, Lynn
spellingShingle	Varcin, Lynn ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc training misc squat misc perceived effort misc push misc patient handling misc Kinematics misc Success factors misc Variance analysis misc Movement misc Ergonomics Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
authorStr	Varcin, Lynn
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129070637
format	Article
dewey-ones	650 - Management & auxiliary services
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0014-0139
topic_title	650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques training squat perceived effort push patient handling Kinematics Success factors Variance analysis Movement Ergonomics
topic	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc training misc squat misc perceived effort misc push misc patient handling misc Kinematics misc Success factors misc Variance analysis misc Movement misc Ergonomics
topic_unstemmed	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc training misc squat misc perceived effort misc push misc patient handling misc Kinematics misc Success factors misc Variance analysis misc Movement misc Ergonomics
topic_browse	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc training misc squat misc perceived effort misc push misc patient handling misc Kinematics misc Success factors misc Variance analysis misc Movement misc Ergonomics
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	a c ac d h w v dhw dhwv p h ph
hierarchy_parent_title	Ergonomics
hierarchy_parent_id	129070637
dewey-tens	650 - Management & public relations
hierarchy_top_title	Ergonomics
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556
title	Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1964151562 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562 (PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170 (KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr
title_full	Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
author_sort	Varcin, Lynn
journal	Ergonomics
journalStr	Ergonomics
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	268
author_browse	Varcin, Lynn
container_volume	58
class	650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Varcin, Lynn
doi_str_mv	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586
dewey-full	650
title_sort	manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
title_auth	Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
abstract	This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.
abstractGer	This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.
abstract_unstemmed	This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525
remote_bool	false
author2	Claus, Andrew van den Hoorn, Wolbert Hodges, Paul
author2Str	Claus, Andrew van den Hoorn, Wolbert Hodges, Paul
ppnlink	129070637
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth oth
doi_str	10.1080/00140139.2014.970586
up_date	2024-07-04T07:18:14.150Z
_version_	1803631978505830400
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964151562</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172600.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964151562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964151562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c3352-1c57824e507d5ffc69338568df8d67801ba626808edf765c54296518b2201b170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020150000058000200268manualhandlingdifferencesinperceivedeffortsuccessr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varcin, Lynn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study examined the perceived effort, success rates and kinematics for three push strategies in a simulated lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide). Thirteen healthy subjects (four males) completed three repetition pushing loads of 6, 10 and 14 kg in random order; with a spontaneous push strategy, then with a straight-back bent-knees (squat) strategy and the preparatory pelvic movement ('rockback') strategy in random order. Perceived effort and kinematic parameters measured at the onset of movement and at maximum push excursion were compared between strategies and between loads with repeated measures ANOVA. The spontaneous and 'rockback' strategies achieved the pushing task with less perceived effort across all loads than the squat push (P < 0.001). Only 3/13 participants were successful on all attempts at pushing the 14 kg load using a squat strategy, which contrasted with 12/13 participants when the spontaneous strategy or the 'rockback' strategy was used. Forward movement of the pelvis and forward trunk inclination may be positively associated with lower perceived effort in the push task. Practitioner Summary: In a manual-handling task that simulated a lateral patient transfer (horizontal slide), perceived effort and success rates of three push strategies were compared. A straight-back bent-knees push (squat) strategy demonstrated greater perceived effort and lower success rates than a spontaneous push strategy, or a push strategy with preparatory 'rockback' pelvic movement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">training</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">squat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">perceived effort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">push</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient handling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kinematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Success factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Variance analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Movement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Claus, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van den Hoorn, Wolbert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hodges, Paul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">58(2015), 2, Seite 268-277</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:268-277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.970586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25343518</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1648345525</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">268-277</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401043

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?