Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice

Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may off...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Read, Gemma J.M [verfasserIn] Salmon, Paul M Lenné, Michael G Stanton, Neville A

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014

Schlagwörter:	complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Ergonomics - London : Taylor & Francis, 1957, 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:58 ; year:2015 ; number:5 ; pages:822-851

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335

Katalog-ID:	OLC1964152429

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1964152429
003	DE-627
005	20220219172601.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1964152429
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429
035			\|a (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60
035			\|a (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 650 \|q DNB
084			\|a 44.12 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 85.52 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Read, Gemma J.M \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014
650		4	\|a complex systems
650		4	\|a system design
650		4	\|a cognitive work analysis
650		4	\|a sociotechnical systems theory
650		4	\|a Systems design
650		4	\|a System theory
650		4	\|a Cognition & reasoning
650		4	\|a Design engineering
650		4	\|a Design optimization
650		4	\|a Human factors research
700	1		\|a Salmon, Paul M \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Lenné, Michael G \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Stanton, Neville A \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Ergonomics \|d London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 \|g 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 \|w (DE-627)129070637 \|w (DE-600)1920-3 \|w (DE-576)014402556 \|x 0014-0139 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:58 \|g year:2015 \|g number:5 \|g pages:822-851
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335
856	4	2	\|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-SPO
912			\|a SSG-OPC-FOR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4314
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4598
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.12 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 85.52 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 58 \|j 2015 \|e 5 \|h 822-851

Indexfelder

author_variant	g j r gj gjr
matchkey_str	article:00140139:2015----::einnscoehiassesihontvwraayiptig
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	44.12 85.52
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Read, Gemma J.M verfasserin aut Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research Salmon, Paul M oth Lenné, Michael G oth Stanton, Neville A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 5 822-851
spelling	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Read, Gemma J.M verfasserin aut Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research Salmon, Paul M oth Lenné, Michael G oth Stanton, Neville A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 5 822-851
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Read, Gemma J.M verfasserin aut Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research Salmon, Paul M oth Lenné, Michael G oth Stanton, Neville A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 5 822-851
allfieldsGer	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Read, Gemma J.M verfasserin aut Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research Salmon, Paul M oth Lenné, Michael G oth Stanton, Neville A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 5 822-851
allfieldsSound	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Read, Gemma J.M verfasserin aut Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014 complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research Salmon, Paul M oth Lenné, Michael G oth Stanton, Neville A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 58 2015 5 822-851
language	English
source	Enthalten in Ergonomics 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851
sourceStr	Enthalten in Ergonomics 58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851 volume:58 year:2015 number:5 pages:822-851
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research
dewey-raw	650
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Ergonomics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Read, Gemma J.M @@aut@@ Salmon, Paul M @@oth@@ Lenné, Michael G @@oth@@ Stanton, Neville A @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129070637
dewey-sort	3650
id	OLC1964152429
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964152429</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172601.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964152429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Read, Gemma J.M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">complex systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cognitive work analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sociotechnical systems theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systems design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">System theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognition & reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human factors research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmon, Paul M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lenné, Michael G</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanton, Neville A</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:822-851</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">822-851</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Read, Gemma J.M
spellingShingle	Read, Gemma J.M ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc complex systems misc system design misc cognitive work analysis misc sociotechnical systems theory misc Systems design misc System theory misc Cognition & reasoning misc Design engineering misc Design optimization misc Human factors research Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
authorStr	Read, Gemma J.M
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129070637
format	Article
dewey-ones	650 - Management & auxiliary services
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0014-0139
topic_title	650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice complex systems system design cognitive work analysis sociotechnical systems theory Systems design System theory Cognition & reasoning Design engineering Design optimization Human factors research
topic	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc complex systems misc system design misc cognitive work analysis misc sociotechnical systems theory misc Systems design misc System theory misc Cognition & reasoning misc Design engineering misc Design optimization misc Human factors research
topic_unstemmed	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc complex systems misc system design misc cognitive work analysis misc sociotechnical systems theory misc Systems design misc System theory misc Cognition & reasoning misc Design engineering misc Design optimization misc Human factors research
topic_browse	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc complex systems misc system design misc cognitive work analysis misc sociotechnical systems theory misc Systems design misc System theory misc Cognition & reasoning misc Design engineering misc Design optimization misc Human factors research
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	p m s pm pms m g l mg mgl n a s na nas
hierarchy_parent_title	Ergonomics
hierarchy_parent_id	129070637
dewey-tens	650 - Management & public relations
hierarchy_top_title	Ergonomics
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556
title	Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1964152429 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429 (PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60 (KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana
title_full	Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
author_sort	Read, Gemma J.M
journal	Ergonomics
journalStr	Ergonomics
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	822
author_browse	Read, Gemma J.M
container_volume	58
class	650 DNB 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Read, Gemma J.M
doi_str_mv	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335
dewey-full	650
title_sort	designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
title_auth	Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
abstract	Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.
abstractGer	Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.
abstract_unstemmed	Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977
remote_bool	false
author2	Salmon, Paul M Lenné, Michael G Stanton, Neville A
author2Str	Salmon, Paul M Lenné, Michael G Stanton, Neville A
ppnlink	129070637
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth oth
doi_str	10.1080/00140139.2014.980335
up_date	2024-07-04T07:18:24.046Z
_version_	1803631988883587072
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964152429</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172601.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964152429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964152429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2925-b72ca12421b7f4394da0d1767ff5f1e4ae9b70c4644eed4441d4ddd2c2ef9bd60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020150000058000500822designingsociotechnicalsystemswithcognitiveworkana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Read, Gemma J.M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework of methods for analysing complex sociotechnical systems. However, the translation from the outputs of CWA to design is not straightforward. Sociotechnical systems theory provides values and principles for the design of sociotechnical systems which may offer a theoretically consistent basis for a design approach for use with CWA. This article explores the extent to which CWA and sociotechnical systems theory offer complementary perspectives and presents an abstraction hierarchy (AH), based on a review of literature, that describes an 'optimal' CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design system. The optimal AH is used to assess the extent to which current CWA-based design practices, uncovered through a survey of CWA practitioners, aligns with sociotechnical systems theory. Recommendations for a design approach that would support the integration of CWA and sociotechnical systems theory design values and principles are also derived. Practitioner Summary: Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is commonly used by ergonomics practitioners for evaluating complex systems and informing the development of design improvements. Despite this, translation from analysis to design is not straightforward. Building upon synergies between CWA and sociotechnical systems design principles, recommendations for a design toolkit are specified.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">complex systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cognitive work analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sociotechnical systems theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systems design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">System theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognition & reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human factors research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmon, Paul M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lenné, Michael G</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanton, Neville A</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">58(2015), 5, Seite 822-851</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:58</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:822-851</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2014.980335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407778</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1683374977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">58</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">822-851</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399728

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Designing sociotechnical systems with cognitive work analysis: putting theory back into practice

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?