Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry
The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and com...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ortolani, Emanuela [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965, 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; year:2015 ; number:3 ; pages:229-235 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1964359112 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1964359112 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220215154107.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1964359112 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 070 |a 610 |q DNB |
084 | |a GER |2 fid | ||
084 | |a 44.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ortolani, Emanuela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. | ||
650 | 4 | |a RA1-1270 | |
650 | 4 | |a guided tissue regeneration | |
650 | 4 | |a collagen | |
650 | 4 | |a membrane mechanical testing | |
650 | 4 | |a Medicine | |
650 | 4 | |a Public aspects of medicine | |
650 | 4 | |a guided bone regeneration | |
700 | 1 | |a Quadrini, Fabrizio |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bellisario, Denise |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Santo, Loredana |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Polimeni, Antonella |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Santarsiero, Anna |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |d Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 |g 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 |w (DE-627)130687014 |w (DE-600)950344-4 |w (DE-576)016234677 |x 0021-2571 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:229-235 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-GER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 51 |j 2015 |e 3 |h 229-235 |
author_variant |
e o eo |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00212571:2015----::ehnclulfctooclaemmrns |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
44.00 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Ortolani, Emanuela verfasserin aut Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration Quadrini, Fabrizio oth Bellisario, Denise oth Santo, Loredana oth Polimeni, Antonella oth Santarsiero, Anna oth Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 (DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 0021-2571 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 44.00 AVZ AR 51 2015 3 229-235 |
spelling |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Ortolani, Emanuela verfasserin aut Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration Quadrini, Fabrizio oth Bellisario, Denise oth Santo, Loredana oth Polimeni, Antonella oth Santarsiero, Anna oth Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 (DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 0021-2571 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 44.00 AVZ AR 51 2015 3 229-235 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Ortolani, Emanuela verfasserin aut Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration Quadrini, Fabrizio oth Bellisario, Denise oth Santo, Loredana oth Polimeni, Antonella oth Santarsiero, Anna oth Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 (DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 0021-2571 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 44.00 AVZ AR 51 2015 3 229-235 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Ortolani, Emanuela verfasserin aut Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration Quadrini, Fabrizio oth Bellisario, Denise oth Santo, Loredana oth Polimeni, Antonella oth Santarsiero, Anna oth Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 (DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 0021-2571 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 44.00 AVZ AR 51 2015 3 229-235 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Ortolani, Emanuela verfasserin aut Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration Quadrini, Fabrizio oth Bellisario, Denise oth Santo, Loredana oth Polimeni, Antonella oth Santarsiero, Anna oth Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 (DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 0021-2571 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 44.00 AVZ AR 51 2015 3 229-235 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità 51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235 volume:51 year:2015 number:3 pages:229-235 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration |
dewey-raw |
070 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ortolani, Emanuela @@aut@@ Quadrini, Fabrizio @@oth@@ Bellisario, Denise @@oth@@ Santo, Loredana @@oth@@ Polimeni, Antonella @@oth@@ Santarsiero, Anna @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130687014 |
dewey-sort |
270 |
id |
OLC1964359112 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964359112</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215154107.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4415/ANN_15_03_11</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964359112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GER</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ortolani, Emanuela</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">guided tissue regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">collagen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">membrane mechanical testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">guided bone regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quadrini, Fabrizio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bellisario, Denise</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santo, Loredana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni, Antonella</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santarsiero, Anna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità</subfield><subfield code="d">Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130687014</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)950344-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016234677</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-2571</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:229-235</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-GER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">229-235</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ortolani, Emanuela |
spellingShingle |
Ortolani, Emanuela ddc 070 fid GER bkl 44.00 misc RA1-1270 misc guided tissue regeneration misc collagen misc membrane mechanical testing misc Medicine misc Public aspects of medicine misc guided bone regeneration Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
authorStr |
Ortolani, Emanuela |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130687014 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0021-2571 |
topic_title |
070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry RA1-1270 guided tissue regeneration collagen membrane mechanical testing Medicine Public aspects of medicine guided bone regeneration |
topic |
ddc 070 fid GER bkl 44.00 misc RA1-1270 misc guided tissue regeneration misc collagen misc membrane mechanical testing misc Medicine misc Public aspects of medicine misc guided bone regeneration |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 070 fid GER bkl 44.00 misc RA1-1270 misc guided tissue regeneration misc collagen misc membrane mechanical testing misc Medicine misc Public aspects of medicine misc guided bone regeneration |
topic_browse |
ddc 070 fid GER bkl 44.00 misc RA1-1270 misc guided tissue regeneration misc collagen misc membrane mechanical testing misc Medicine misc Public aspects of medicine misc guided bone regeneration |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
f q fq d b db l s ls a p ap a s as |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130687014 |
dewey-tens |
070 - News media, journalism & publishing 610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130687014 (DE-600)950344-4 (DE-576)016234677 |
title |
Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1964359112 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112 (PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873 (KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde |
title_full |
Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
author_sort |
Ortolani, Emanuela |
journal |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
journalStr |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
229 |
author_browse |
Ortolani, Emanuela |
container_volume |
51 |
class |
070 610 DNB GER fid 44.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ortolani, Emanuela |
doi_str_mv |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 |
dewey-full |
070 610 |
title_sort |
mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
title_auth |
Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
abstract |
The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. |
abstractGer |
The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-GER SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_4219 |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048 https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Quadrini, Fabrizio Bellisario, Denise Santo, Loredana Polimeni, Antonella Santarsiero, Anna |
author2Str |
Quadrini, Fabrizio Bellisario, Denise Santo, Loredana Polimeni, Antonella Santarsiero, Anna |
ppnlink |
130687014 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.4415/ANN_15_03_11 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T13:43:52.021Z |
_version_ |
1803565643358797824 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964359112</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215154107.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4415/ANN_15_03_11</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964359112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964359112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)d898-2abd8079c163ad7ccc64b6dcbb5dcf3ecf985c63d0b217c832cdb09739444873</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0029874320150000051000300229mechanicalqualificationofcollagenmembranesusedinde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GER</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ortolani, Emanuela</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them. Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">guided tissue regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">collagen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">membrane mechanical testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">guided bone regeneration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Quadrini, Fabrizio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bellisario, Denise</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santo, Loredana</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni, Antonella</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santarsiero, Anna</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità</subfield><subfield code="d">Pescara : Ed. ZiP, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2015), 3, Seite 229-235</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130687014</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)950344-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016234677</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-2571</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:229-235</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_03_11</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ab24d867cf9d4ce9a5c87bbe483b49b4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-GER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">229-235</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400464 |