Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements
British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorce...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The Muslim world - Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948, 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:105 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:496-515 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/muwo.12108 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1964541743 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1964541743 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215132637.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/muwo.12108 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1964541743 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 890 |a 290 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 11.07 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 11.84 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 11.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary | ||
| 540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Laws, regulations and rules | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Marriage | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Islamic law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divorce | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Colonies & territories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Muslims | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Muslim world |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 |g 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 |w (DE-627)129552879 |w (DE-600)219852-6 |w (DE-576)01500841X |x 0027-4909 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:105 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:496-515 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-VOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-OAS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MFO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-VOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 11.07 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 11.84 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 11.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 105 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 496-515 | ||
| author_variant |
n y ny |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00274909:2015----::rvnbracayaraesailwnaapttoesn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
11.07 11.84 11.00 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1111/muwo.12108 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Yahaya, Nurfadzilah verfasserin aut Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims Enthalten in The Muslim world Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 (DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X 0027-4909 nnns volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 11.07 AVZ 11.84 AVZ 11.00 AVZ AR 105 2015 4 496-515 |
| spelling |
10.1111/muwo.12108 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Yahaya, Nurfadzilah verfasserin aut Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims Enthalten in The Muslim world Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 (DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X 0027-4909 nnns volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 11.07 AVZ 11.84 AVZ 11.00 AVZ AR 105 2015 4 496-515 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/muwo.12108 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Yahaya, Nurfadzilah verfasserin aut Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims Enthalten in The Muslim world Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 (DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X 0027-4909 nnns volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 11.07 AVZ 11.84 AVZ 11.00 AVZ AR 105 2015 4 496-515 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/muwo.12108 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Yahaya, Nurfadzilah verfasserin aut Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims Enthalten in The Muslim world Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 (DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X 0027-4909 nnns volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 11.07 AVZ 11.84 AVZ 11.00 AVZ AR 105 2015 4 496-515 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/muwo.12108 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Yahaya, Nurfadzilah verfasserin aut Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims Enthalten in The Muslim world Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 (DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X 0027-4909 nnns volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 11.07 AVZ 11.84 AVZ 11.00 AVZ AR 105 2015 4 496-515 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The Muslim world 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The Muslim world 105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515 volume:105 year:2015 number:4 pages:496-515 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims |
| dewey-raw |
890 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The Muslim world |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129552879 |
| dewey-sort |
3890 |
| id |
OLC1964541743 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964541743</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215132637.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/muwo.12108</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964541743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">890</subfield><subfield code="a">290</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yahaya, Nurfadzilah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marriage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divorce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Colonies & territories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Muslims</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Muslim world</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948</subfield><subfield code="g">105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129552879</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219852-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01500841X</subfield><subfield code="x">0027-4909</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:105</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:496-515</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.07</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">105</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">496-515</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |
| spellingShingle |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah ddc 890 bkl 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Marriage misc Islamic law misc Divorce misc Colonies & territories misc Muslims Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| authorStr |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129552879 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
890 - Literatures of other languages 290 - Other religions |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0027-4909 |
| topic_title |
890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements Laws, regulations and rules Marriage Islamic law Divorce Colonies & territories Muslims |
| topic |
ddc 890 bkl 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Marriage misc Islamic law misc Divorce misc Colonies & territories misc Muslims |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 890 bkl 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Marriage misc Islamic law misc Divorce misc Colonies & territories misc Muslims |
| topic_browse |
ddc 890 bkl 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Marriage misc Islamic law misc Divorce misc Colonies & territories misc Muslims |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The Muslim world |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129552879 |
| dewey-tens |
890 - Other literatures 290 - Other religions |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The Muslim world |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129552879 (DE-600)219852-6 (DE-576)01500841X |
| title |
Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1964541743 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743 (PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190 (KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio |
| title_full |
Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| author_sort |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |
| journal |
The Muslim world |
| journalStr |
The Muslim world |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
800 - Literature 200 - Religion |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
496 |
| author_browse |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |
| container_volume |
105 |
| class |
890 290 DNB 11.07 bkl 11.84 bkl 11.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Yahaya, Nurfadzilah |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/muwo.12108 |
| dewey-full |
890 290 |
| title_sort |
craving bureaucracy: marriage, islamic law, and arab petitioners in the straits settlements |
| title_auth |
Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| abstract |
British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. |
| abstractGer |
British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-VOR SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4305 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129552879 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/muwo.12108 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:21:22.859Z |
| _version_ |
1803568003534553088 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964541743</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215132637.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/muwo.12108</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964541743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964541743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g1528-21e99d32b22a30e05b730fc6ddf3625d5ea0fab770c16857903c9d63e4178a190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0032076520150000105000400496cravingbureaucracymarriageislamiclawandarabpetitio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">890</subfield><subfield code="a">290</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yahaya, Nurfadzilah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic Law, and Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">British involvement in Muslim affairs in the Straits Settlements (Malacca, Penang and Singapore) was done at the behest of Muslim subjects in the colony. Arab Muslims, who were a minority in the region, exhorted British authorities to take charge of the administration of Muslim marriages and divorces. In this way, authority was vested by these Muslims in colonial legal institutions. Instead of trying to wrest religious authority from the secular colonial power, petitioners essentially attempted to remove religious authority from the hands of Muslim qāḍis by granting more control to non‐Muslim British colonial authorities. Though British authorities were initially reluctant to take on the mantle of administering legal lives of Muslim subjects who formed fifteen percent of the British Crown Colony, a petition in 1875 subsequently led to the application of legal codes and case law devised in British India in 1880 through the Mahomedan Marriage Ordinance that was brought into effect in 1882. This led to an unprecedented development in the administration of Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Thereafter, colonial legal practitioners relied heavily on this corpus of precedents and knowledge prepared by their predecessors in British India. Their conception of Islamic law was in other words based on a universal view of Islamic law, minimally affected by local understandings and customs. A universal view of Islam, coupled with centralized colonial bureaucracy suited the needs of highly mobile Arabs who traversed the Indian Ocean as they craved accountability on the part of legal administrators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Hartford Seminary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marriage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divorce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Colonies & territories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Muslims</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Muslim world</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 1948</subfield><subfield code="g">105(2015), 4, Seite 496-515</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129552879</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219852-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01500841X</subfield><subfield code="x">0027-4909</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:105</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:496-515</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12108</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muwo.12108/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1714550707</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.07</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">11.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">105</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">496-515</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3985224 |