Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide
There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, d...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The criminal law review - London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954, (2015), 5, Seite 340 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2015 ; number:5 ; pages:340 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1964545706 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1964545706 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714162542.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1964545706 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal procedure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cross-examination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laws, regulations and rules | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Testimony | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cross examination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trials | |
| 700 | 0 | |a David Caruso |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a James Krumrey-Quinn |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The criminal law review |d London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 |g (2015), 5, Seite 340 |w (DE-627)168200694 |w (DE-600)702179-3 |w (DE-576)015943658 |x 0011-135X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2015 |g number:5 |g pages:340 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-INTRECHT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_184 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2015 |e 5 |h 340 | ||
| author_variant |
j m w jmw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:0011135X:2015----::ehnigednteietvnn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid Jacqueline M Wheatcroft verfasserin aut Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials David Caruso oth James Krumrey-Quinn oth Enthalten in The criminal law review London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 (2015), 5, Seite 340 (DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 0011-135X nnns year:2015 number:5 pages:340 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 AR 2015 5 340 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid Jacqueline M Wheatcroft verfasserin aut Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials David Caruso oth James Krumrey-Quinn oth Enthalten in The criminal law review London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 (2015), 5, Seite 340 (DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 0011-135X nnns year:2015 number:5 pages:340 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 AR 2015 5 340 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid Jacqueline M Wheatcroft verfasserin aut Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials David Caruso oth James Krumrey-Quinn oth Enthalten in The criminal law review London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 (2015), 5, Seite 340 (DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 0011-135X nnns year:2015 number:5 pages:340 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 AR 2015 5 340 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid Jacqueline M Wheatcroft verfasserin aut Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials David Caruso oth James Krumrey-Quinn oth Enthalten in The criminal law review London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 (2015), 5, Seite 340 (DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 0011-135X nnns year:2015 number:5 pages:340 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 AR 2015 5 340 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid Jacqueline M Wheatcroft verfasserin aut Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials David Caruso oth James Krumrey-Quinn oth Enthalten in The criminal law review London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954 (2015), 5, Seite 340 (DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 0011-135X nnns year:2015 number:5 pages:340 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 AR 2015 5 340 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The criminal law review (2015), 5, Seite 340 year:2015 number:5 pages:340 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The criminal law review (2015), 5, Seite 340 year:2015 number:5 pages:340 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The criminal law review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft @@aut@@ David Caruso @@oth@@ James Krumrey-Quinn @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
168200694 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1964545706 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964545706</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714162542.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964545706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacqueline M Wheatcroft</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Testimony</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Caruso</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James Krumrey-Quinn</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The criminal law review</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954</subfield><subfield code="g">(2015), 5, Seite 340</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168200694</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)702179-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015943658</subfield><subfield code="x">0011-135X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">340</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |
| spellingShingle |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc Criminal procedure misc Cross-examination misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Testimony misc Cross examination misc Trials Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| authorStr |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)168200694 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0011-135X |
| topic_title |
340 DNB INTRECHT fid Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide Criminal procedure Cross-examination Analysis Laws, regulations and rules Testimony Cross examination Trials |
| topic |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc Criminal procedure misc Cross-examination misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Testimony misc Cross examination misc Trials |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc Criminal procedure misc Cross-examination misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Testimony misc Cross examination misc Trials |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc Criminal procedure misc Cross-examination misc Analysis misc Laws, regulations and rules misc Testimony misc Cross examination misc Trials |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
d c dc j k q jkq |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The criminal law review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
168200694 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The criminal law review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)168200694 (DE-600)702179-3 (DE-576)015943658 |
| title |
Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1964545706 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706 (PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010 (KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide |
| title_full |
Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| author_sort |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |
| journal |
The criminal law review |
| journalStr |
The criminal law review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
340 |
| author_browse |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |
| class |
340 DNB INTRECHT fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jacqueline M Wheatcroft |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| title_auth |
Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| abstract |
There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. |
| abstractGer |
There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4306 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
David Caruso James Krumrey-Quinn |
| author2Str |
David Caruso James Krumrey-Quinn |
| ppnlink |
168200694 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:21:58.765Z |
| _version_ |
1803568041189965824 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964545706</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714162542.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964545706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964545706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g749-3bfbdc4dc027eb95741c1ec11a8bc589e8f160f436ead0175f7f6b870ad010010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0032121420150000000000500340rethinkingleadingthedirectivenondirectivedivide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacqueline M Wheatcroft</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the effectiveness of leading questions during the trial process. This article argues that the current approach to leading questions does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose here its reform. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laws, regulations and rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Testimony</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross examination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Caruso</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">James Krumrey-Quinn</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The criminal law review</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Thomson / Sweet & Maxwell, 1954</subfield><subfield code="g">(2015), 5, Seite 340</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168200694</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)702179-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015943658</subfield><subfield code="x">0011-135X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1679038889</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">340</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400133 |