Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility
A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Erhan Artuç [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of international economics - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971, 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:97 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:278 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1964735521 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1964735521 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211208174648.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1964735521 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DNB |
100 | 0 | |a Erhan Artuç |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Econometric models | |
650 | 4 | |a Commercial policy | |
650 | 4 | |a International trade | |
650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Outsourcing | |
650 | 4 | |a Equality | |
650 | 4 | |a Comparative advantage | |
650 | 4 | |a Wage differential | |
650 | 4 | |a Occupational mobility | |
650 | 4 | |a Rational expectations | |
650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Employment | |
650 | 4 | |a Trade policy | |
700 | 0 | |a John McLaren |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of international economics |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 |g 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 |w (DE-627)129289027 |w (DE-600)120143-8 |w (DE-576)014470551 |x 0022-1996 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:97 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:278 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 97 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 278 |
author_variant |
e a ea |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00221996:2015----::rdplcadaenqaiysrcuaaayiwtocpto |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Erhan Artuç verfasserin aut Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy John McLaren oth Enthalten in Journal of international economics Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 (DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 0022-1996 nnns volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 97 2015 2 278 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Erhan Artuç verfasserin aut Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy John McLaren oth Enthalten in Journal of international economics Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 (DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 0022-1996 nnns volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 97 2015 2 278 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Erhan Artuç verfasserin aut Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy John McLaren oth Enthalten in Journal of international economics Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 (DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 0022-1996 nnns volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 97 2015 2 278 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Erhan Artuç verfasserin aut Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy John McLaren oth Enthalten in Journal of international economics Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 (DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 0022-1996 nnns volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 97 2015 2 278 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Erhan Artuç verfasserin aut Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy John McLaren oth Enthalten in Journal of international economics Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 (DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 0022-1996 nnns volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 97 2015 2 278 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of international economics 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of international economics 97(2015), 2, Seite 278 volume:97 year:2015 number:2 pages:278 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of international economics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Erhan Artuç @@aut@@ John McLaren @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129289027 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
OLC1964735521 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964735521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211208174648.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964735521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erhan Artuç</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commercial policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Outsourcing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Equality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative advantage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wage differential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational expectations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John McLaren</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of international economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">97(2015), 2, Seite 278</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129289027</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)120143-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014470551</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-1996</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:97</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">97</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">278</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Erhan Artuç |
spellingShingle |
Erhan Artuç ddc 330 misc Econometric models misc Commercial policy misc International trade misc Analysis misc Outsourcing misc Equality misc Comparative advantage misc Wage differential misc Occupational mobility misc Rational expectations misc Studies misc Employment misc Trade policy Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
authorStr |
Erhan Artuç |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129289027 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0022-1996 |
topic_title |
330 DNB Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility Econometric models Commercial policy International trade Analysis Outsourcing Equality Comparative advantage Wage differential Occupational mobility Rational expectations Studies Employment Trade policy |
topic |
ddc 330 misc Econometric models misc Commercial policy misc International trade misc Analysis misc Outsourcing misc Equality misc Comparative advantage misc Wage differential misc Occupational mobility misc Rational expectations misc Studies misc Employment misc Trade policy |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Econometric models misc Commercial policy misc International trade misc Analysis misc Outsourcing misc Equality misc Comparative advantage misc Wage differential misc Occupational mobility misc Rational expectations misc Studies misc Employment misc Trade policy |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Econometric models misc Commercial policy misc International trade misc Analysis misc Outsourcing misc Equality misc Comparative advantage misc Wage differential misc Occupational mobility misc Rational expectations misc Studies misc Employment misc Trade policy |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
j m jm |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of international economics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129289027 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of international economics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129289027 (DE-600)120143-8 (DE-576)014470551 |
title |
Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1964735521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521 (PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30 (KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit |
title_full |
Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
author_sort |
Erhan Artuç |
journal |
Journal of international economics |
journalStr |
Journal of international economics |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
278 |
author_browse |
Erhan Artuç |
container_volume |
97 |
class |
330 DNB |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Erhan Artuç |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 |
dewey-full |
330 |
title_sort |
trade policy and wage inequality: a structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
title_auth |
Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
abstract |
A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] |
abstractGer |
A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] |
abstract_unstemmed |
A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129] |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
John McLaren |
author2Str |
John McLaren |
ppnlink |
129289027 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:06:28.084Z |
_version_ |
1803570840162271232 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964735521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211208174648.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964735521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964735521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g1284-23663377745b559635f8afbbdc6564d17f331c479df95516f2dc86c7af50f4b30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0035083420150000097000200278tradepolicyandwageinequalityastructuralanalysiswit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erhan Artuç</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trade policy and wage inequality: A structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A number of authors have argued that a worker's occupation of employment is at least as important as the worker's industry of employment in determining whether the worker will be hurt or helped by international trade. We investigate the role of occupational mobility on the effects of trade shocks on wage inequality in a dynamic, structural econometric model of worker adjustment. Each worker in our specification can switch either industry, occupation, or both, paying a time-varying cost to do so in a rational-expectations optimizing environment. We also specify a novel model of offshoring based on task-by-task comparative advantage that collapses to a very simple form for simulation. We find that the costs of switching industry and occupation are both high, and of similar magnitude. In simulations we find that a worker's industry of employment is much more important than either the worker's occupation or skill class in determining whether or not she is harmed by a trade shock, but occupation is crucial in determining who is harmed by an offshoring shock. [web URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001129]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier Science Publishers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commercial policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Outsourcing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Equality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative advantage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wage differential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational mobility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational expectations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John McLaren</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of international economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">97(2015), 2, Seite 278</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129289027</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)120143-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014470551</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-1996</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:97</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.06.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1748866313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">97</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">278</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3992357 |