The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Smith, Peter M [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Accident analysis & prevention - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969, 82(2015), Seite 234-243 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:82 ; year:2015 ; pages:234-243 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1964902819 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1964902819 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220216173612.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1964902819 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |q DNB |
084 | |a 55.84 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 55.24 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 44.80 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smith, Peter M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Saunders, Ron |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lifshen, Marni |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Black, Ollie |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lay, Morgan |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Breslin, F Curtis |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a LaMontagne, Anthony D |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tompa, Emile |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Accident analysis & prevention |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 |g 82(2015), Seite 234-243 |w (DE-627)129511188 |w (DE-600)210223-7 |w (DE-576)014918552 |x 0001-4575 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2015 |g pages:234-243 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 55.84 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 55.24 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 44.80 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 82 |j 2015 |h 234-243 |
author_variant |
p m s pm pms |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00014575:2015----::hdvlpetfcnetamdlnslrpremauefcuainlel |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
55.84 55.24 44.80 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention 82(2015), Seite 234-243 volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention 82(2015), Seite 234-243 volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
650 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Accident analysis & prevention |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Smith, Peter M @@aut@@ Saunders, Ron @@oth@@ Lifshen, Marni @@oth@@ Black, Ollie @@oth@@ Lay, Morgan @@oth@@ Breslin, F Curtis @@oth@@ LaMontagne, Anthony D @@oth@@ Tompa, Emile @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129511188 |
dewey-sort |
3650 |
id |
OLC1964902819 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964902819</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216173612.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Peter M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saunders, Ron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lifshen, Marni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lay, Morgan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Breslin, F Curtis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LaMontagne, Anthony D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tompa, Emile</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Accident analysis & prevention</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2015), Seite 234-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129511188</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)210223-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014918552</subfield><subfield code="x">0001-4575</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:234-243</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">234-243</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Smith, Peter M |
spellingShingle |
Smith, Peter M ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
authorStr |
Smith, Peter M |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129511188 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0001-4575 |
topic_title |
650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
topic |
ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 |
topic_browse |
ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
r s rs m l ml o b ob m l ml f c b fc fcb a d l ad adl e t et |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Accident analysis & prevention |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129511188 |
dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations |
hierarchy_top_title |
Accident analysis & prevention |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 |
title |
The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur |
title_full |
The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
author_sort |
Smith, Peter M |
journal |
Accident analysis & prevention |
journalStr |
Accident analysis & prevention |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
234 |
author_browse |
Smith, Peter M |
container_volume |
82 |
class |
650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Smith, Peter M |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 |
dewey-full |
650 |
title_sort |
development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
title_auth |
The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
abstract |
Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. |
abstractGer |
Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 |
title_short |
The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Saunders, Ron Lifshen, Marni Black, Ollie Lay, Morgan Breslin, F Curtis LaMontagne, Anthony D Tompa, Emile |
author2Str |
Saunders, Ron Lifshen, Marni Black, Ollie Lay, Morgan Breslin, F Curtis LaMontagne, Anthony D Tompa, Emile |
ppnlink |
129511188 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:43:53.148Z |
_version_ |
1803573194287742976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964902819</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216173612.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Peter M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saunders, Ron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lifshen, Marni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lay, Morgan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Breslin, F Curtis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LaMontagne, Anthony D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tompa, Emile</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Accident analysis & prevention</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2015), Seite 234-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129511188</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)210223-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014918552</subfield><subfield code="x">0001-4575</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:234-243</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">234-243</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399976 |