The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability

Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Smith, Peter M [verfasserIn] Saunders, Ron Lifshen, Marni Black, Ollie Lay, Morgan Breslin, F Curtis LaMontagne, Anthony D Tompa, Emile

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Accident analysis & prevention - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969, 82(2015), Seite 234-243
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:82 ; year:2015 ; pages:234-243

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004

Katalog-ID:	OLC1964902819

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1964902819
003	DE-627
005	20220216173612.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1964902819
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819
035			\|a (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0
035			\|a (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 650 \|q DNB
084			\|a 55.84 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 55.24 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 44.80 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Smith, Peter M \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
700	1		\|a Saunders, Ron \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Lifshen, Marni \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Black, Ollie \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Lay, Morgan \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Breslin, F Curtis \|4 oth
700	1		\|a LaMontagne, Anthony D \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Tompa, Emile \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Accident analysis & prevention \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 \|g 82(2015), Seite 234-243 \|w (DE-627)129511188 \|w (DE-600)210223-7 \|w (DE-576)014918552 \|x 0001-4575 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:82 \|g year:2015 \|g pages:234-243
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-UMW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-TEC
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
936	b	k	\|a 55.84 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 55.24 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 44.80 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 82 \|j 2015 \|h 234-243

Indexfelder

author_variant	p m s pm pms
matchkey_str	article:00014575:2015----::hdvlpetfcnetamdlnslrpremauefcuainlel
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	55.84 55.24 44.80
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243
spelling	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl Smith, Peter M verfasserin aut The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Saunders, Ron oth Lifshen, Marni oth Black, Ollie oth Lay, Morgan oth Breslin, F Curtis oth LaMontagne, Anthony D oth Tompa, Emile oth Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969 82(2015), Seite 234-243 (DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552 0001-4575 nnns volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 55.84 AVZ 55.24 AVZ 44.80 AVZ AR 82 2015 234-243
language	English
source	Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention 82(2015), Seite 234-243 volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243
sourceStr	Enthalten in Accident analysis & prevention 82(2015), Seite 234-243 volume:82 year:2015 pages:234-243
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
dewey-raw	650
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Accident analysis & prevention
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Smith, Peter M @@aut@@ Saunders, Ron @@oth@@ Lifshen, Marni @@oth@@ Black, Ollie @@oth@@ Lay, Morgan @@oth@@ Breslin, F Curtis @@oth@@ LaMontagne, Anthony D @@oth@@ Tompa, Emile @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129511188
dewey-sort	3650
id	OLC1964902819
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964902819</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216173612.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Peter M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saunders, Ron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lifshen, Marni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lay, Morgan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Breslin, F Curtis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LaMontagne, Anthony D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tompa, Emile</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Accident analysis & prevention</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2015), Seite 234-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129511188</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)210223-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014918552</subfield><subfield code="x">0001-4575</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:234-243</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">234-243</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Smith, Peter M
spellingShingle	Smith, Peter M ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
authorStr	Smith, Peter M
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129511188
format	Article
dewey-ones	650 - Management & auxiliary services
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0001-4575
topic_title	650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
topic	ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80
topic_unstemmed	ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80
topic_browse	ddc 650 bkl 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	r s rs m l ml o b ob m l ml f c b fc fcb a d l ad adl e t et
hierarchy_parent_title	Accident analysis & prevention
hierarchy_parent_id	129511188
dewey-tens	650 - Management & public relations
hierarchy_top_title	Accident analysis & prevention
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129511188 (DE-600)210223-7 (DE-576)014918552
title	The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1964902819 (DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819 (PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0 (KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur
title_full	The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
author_sort	Smith, Peter M
journal	Accident analysis & prevention
journalStr	Accident analysis & prevention
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	234
author_browse	Smith, Peter M
container_volume	82
class	650 DNB 55.84 bkl 55.24 bkl 44.80 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Smith, Peter M
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004
dewey-full	650
title_sort	development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
title_auth	The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
abstract	Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.
abstractGer	Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.
abstract_unstemmed	Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012
title_short	The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437
remote_bool	false
author2	Saunders, Ron Lifshen, Marni Black, Ollie Lay, Morgan Breslin, F Curtis LaMontagne, Anthony D Tompa, Emile
author2Str	Saunders, Ron Lifshen, Marni Black, Ollie Lay, Morgan Breslin, F Curtis LaMontagne, Anthony D Tompa, Emile
ppnlink	129511188
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth oth oth oth oth oth
doi_str	10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004
up_date	2024-07-03T15:43:53.148Z
_version_	1803573194287742976
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1964902819</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216173612.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1964902819</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1547-6946898bf75560113f1de27d8dc8b0cd270d34be8f554ec76aacde3bfc14ec2a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0037621320150000082000000234developmentofaconceptualmodelandselfreportedmeasur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smith, Peter M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Injuries at work have a substantial economic and societal burden. Often groups of labour market participants, such as young workers, recent immigrants or temporary workers are labelled as being "vulnerable" to work injury. However, defining groups in this way does little to enable a better understanding of the broader factors that place workers at increased risk of injury. In this paper we describe the development of a new measure of occupational health and safety (OH&S) vulnerability. The purpose of this measure was to allow the identification of workers at increased risk of injury, and to enable the monitoring and surveillance of OH&S vulnerability in the labour market. The development included a systematic literature search, and conducting focus groups with a variety of stakeholder groups, to generate a pool of potential items, followed by a series of steps to reduce these items to a more manageable pool. The final measure is 29-item instrument that captures information on four related, but distinct dimensions, thought to be associated with increased risk of injury. These dimensions are: hazard exposure; occupational health and safety policies and procedures; OH&S awareness; and empowerment to participate in injury prevention. In a large sample of employees in Ontario and British Columbia the final measure displayed minimal missing responses, reasonably good distributions across response categories, and strong factorial validity. This new measure of OH&S vulnerability can identify workers who are at risk of injury and provide information on the dimensions of work that may increase this risk. This measurement could be undertaken at one point in time to compare vulnerability across groups, or be undertaken at multiple time points to examine changes in dimensions of OH&S vulnerability, for example, in response to a primary prevention intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saunders, Ron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lifshen, Marni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ollie</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lay, Morgan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Breslin, F Curtis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LaMontagne, Anthony D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tompa, Emile</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Accident analysis & prevention</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2015), Seite 234-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129511188</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)210223-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014918552</subfield><subfield code="x">0001-4575</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:234-243</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.84</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">55.24</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">234-243</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399976

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?