Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regula...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Wiley, Lindsay F [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: American journal of law & medicine - Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975, 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:41 ; year:2015 ; number:2-3 ; pages:284 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1965232612 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1965232612 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220214195707.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1965232612 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DNB |
084 | |a 86.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wiley, Lindsay F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Food safety | |
650 | 4 | |a Genetically altered foods | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental protection | |
650 | 4 | |a Descriptive labeling | |
650 | 4 | |a Pesticides | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of law & medicine |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 |g 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 |w (DE-627)168451921 |w (DE-600)753043-2 |w (DE-576)01607159X |x 0098-8588 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2015 |g number:2-3 |g pages:284 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2041 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 86.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2015 |e 2-3 |h 284 |
author_variant |
l f w lf lfw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00988588:2015----::eeuainitutndmcayttadoaatotesreutbecesoe |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
86.00 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284 |
spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284 |
allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284 |
allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284 |
allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
American journal of law & medicine |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wiley, Lindsay F @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
168451921 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
OLC1965232612 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965232612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiley, Lindsay F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically altered foods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Descriptive labeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of law & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168451921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)753043-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01607159X</subfield><subfield code="x">0098-8588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">284</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Wiley, Lindsay F |
spellingShingle |
Wiley, Lindsay F ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
authorStr |
Wiley, Lindsay F |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)168451921 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0098-8588 |
topic_title |
610 DNB 86.00 bkl Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides |
topic |
ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
American journal of law & medicine |
hierarchy_parent_id |
168451921 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
American journal of law & medicine |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X |
title |
Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio |
title_full |
Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
author_sort |
Wiley, Lindsay F |
journal |
American journal of law & medicine |
journalStr |
American journal of law & medicine |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
284 |
author_browse |
Wiley, Lindsay F |
container_volume |
41 |
class |
610 DNB 86.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Wiley, Lindsay F |
dewey-full |
610 |
title_sort |
deregulation, distrust, and democracy: state and local action to ensure equitable access to healthy, sustainably produced food |
title_auth |
Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
abstract |
Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. |
abstractGer |
Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 |
container_issue |
2-3 |
title_short |
Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food |
url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
168451921 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:59:26.441Z |
_version_ |
1803577947789983744 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965232612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiley, Lindsay F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically altered foods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Descriptive labeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of law & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168451921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)753043-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01607159X</subfield><subfield code="x">0098-8588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">284</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401189 |