Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food

Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regula...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Wiley, Lindsay F [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: American journal of law & medicine - Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975, 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:41 ; year:2015 ; number:2-3 ; pages:284

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

Katalog-ID:	OLC1965232612

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1965232612
003	DE-627
005	20220214195707.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1965232612
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612
035			\|a (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0
035			\|a (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q DNB
084			\|a 86.00 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Wiley, Lindsay F \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.
650		4	\|a Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence
650		4	\|a Food safety
650		4	\|a Genetically altered foods
650		4	\|a Environmental protection
650		4	\|a Descriptive labeling
650		4	\|a Pesticides
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t American journal of law & medicine \|d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 \|g 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 \|w (DE-627)168451921 \|w (DE-600)753043-2 \|w (DE-576)01607159X \|x 0098-8588 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:41 \|g year:2015 \|g number:2-3 \|g pages:284
856	4	2	\|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-JUR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2041
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4219
936	b	k	\|a 86.00 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 41 \|j 2015 \|e 2-3 \|h 284

Indexfelder

author_variant	l f w lf lfw
matchkey_str	article:00988588:2015----::eeuainitutndmcayttadoaatotesreutbecesoe
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	86.00
publishDate	2015
allfields	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284
spelling	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284
allfields_unstemmed	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284
allfieldsGer	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284
allfieldsSound	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB 86.00 bkl Wiley, Lindsay F verfasserin aut Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty. Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 (DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X 0098-8588 nnns volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219 86.00 AVZ AR 41 2015 2-3 284
language	English
source	Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284
sourceStr	Enthalten in American journal of law & medicine 41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284 volume:41 year:2015 number:2-3 pages:284
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	American journal of law & medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Wiley, Lindsay F @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	168451921
dewey-sort	3610
id	OLC1965232612
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965232612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiley, Lindsay F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically altered foods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Descriptive labeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of law & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168451921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)753043-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01607159X</subfield><subfield code="x">0098-8588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">284</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Wiley, Lindsay F
spellingShingle	Wiley, Lindsay F ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
authorStr	Wiley, Lindsay F
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)168451921
format	Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0098-8588
topic_title	610 DNB 86.00 bkl Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence Food safety Genetically altered foods Environmental protection Descriptive labeling Pesticides
topic	ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides
topic_browse	ddc 610 bkl 86.00 misc Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence misc Food safety misc Genetically altered foods misc Environmental protection misc Descriptive labeling misc Pesticides
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	American journal of law & medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	168451921
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	American journal of law & medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)168451921 (DE-600)753043-2 (DE-576)01607159X
title	Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1965232612 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612 (PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0 (KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio
title_full	Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
author_sort	Wiley, Lindsay F
journal	American journal of law & medicine
journalStr	American journal of law & medicine
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	284
author_browse	Wiley, Lindsay F
container_volume	41
class	610 DNB 86.00 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Wiley, Lindsay F
dewey-full	610
title_sort	deregulation, distrust, and democracy: state and local action to ensure equitable access to healthy, sustainably produced food
title_auth	Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
abstract	Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.
abstractGer	Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.
abstract_unstemmed	Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2041 GBV_ILN_4219
container_issue	2-3
title_short	Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food
url	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	168451921
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-03T16:59:26.441Z
_version_	1803577947789983744
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965232612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965232612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1345-77b86ae89e887ba54a1b2ed1da985e12ce7db4ade9dbdd46ce51e8c58e23954a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0042073520150000041000200284deregulationdistrustanddemocracystateandlocalactio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wiley, Lindsay F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmental, public health, alternative food, and food justice advocates are working together to achieve incremental agricultural subsidy and nutrition assistance reforms that increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables. When it comes to targeting food and beverage products for increased regulation and decreased consumption, however, the priorities of various food reform movements diverge. This article argues that foundational legal issues, including preemption of state and local authority to protect the public's health and welfare, increasing First Amendment protection for commercial speech, and eroding judicial deference to legislative policy judgments, present a more promising avenue for collaboration across movements than discrete food reform priorities around issues like sugary drinks, genetic modification, or organics. Using the Vermont Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Labeling Act litigation, the Kauai GMO Cultivation Ordinance litigation, the New York City Sugary Drinks Portion Rule litigation, and the Cleveland Trans Fat Ban litigation as case studies, I discuss the foundational legal challenges faced by diverse food reformers, even when their discrete reform priorities diverge. I also 'explore the broader implications of cooperation among groups that respond differently to the "irrationalities" (from the public health perspective) or "values" (from the environmental and alternative food perspective) that permeate public risk perception for democratic governance in the face of scientific uncertainty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food Labeling - legislation & jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically altered foods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Descriptive labeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of law & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2015), 2-3, Seite 284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168451921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)753043-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01607159X</subfield><subfield code="x">0098-8588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26591820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1709440181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">284</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401189

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Deregulation, Distrust, and Democracy: State and Local Action to Ensure Equitable Access to Healthy, Sustainably Produced Food

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?