Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts
The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notifica...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wencui Han [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Management information systems - Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977, 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:39 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:909 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1965363709 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1965363709 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714163739.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1965363709 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |a 070 |q DNB |
| 100 | 0 | |a Wencui Han |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Safety management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency communications systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a College campuses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency preparedness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Compliance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United States--US | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Federal legislation | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Serkan Ada |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Raj Sharman |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a H Raghav Rao |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Management information systems |d Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 |g 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 |w (DE-627)167074555 |w (DE-600)405089-7 |w (DE-576)018206689 |x 0276-7783 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:909 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4314 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 39 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 909 | ||
| author_variant |
w h wh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:02767783:2015----::apsmrecntfctossesnxmntoofcosfet |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 070 DNB Wencui Han verfasserin aut Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation Serkan Ada oth Raj Sharman oth H Raghav Rao oth Enthalten in Management information systems Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 (DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 0276-7783 nnns volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 AR 39 2015 4 909 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 070 DNB Wencui Han verfasserin aut Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation Serkan Ada oth Raj Sharman oth H Raghav Rao oth Enthalten in Management information systems Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 (DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 0276-7783 nnns volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 AR 39 2015 4 909 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 070 DNB Wencui Han verfasserin aut Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation Serkan Ada oth Raj Sharman oth H Raghav Rao oth Enthalten in Management information systems Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 (DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 0276-7783 nnns volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 AR 39 2015 4 909 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 070 DNB Wencui Han verfasserin aut Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation Serkan Ada oth Raj Sharman oth H Raghav Rao oth Enthalten in Management information systems Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 (DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 0276-7783 nnns volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 AR 39 2015 4 909 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 070 DNB Wencui Han verfasserin aut Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation Serkan Ada oth Raj Sharman oth H Raghav Rao oth Enthalten in Management information systems Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 (DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 0276-7783 nnns volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 AR 39 2015 4 909 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Management information systems 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Management information systems 39(2015), 4, Seite 909 volume:39 year:2015 number:4 pages:909 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation |
| dewey-raw |
004 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Management information systems |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wencui Han @@aut@@ Serkan Ada @@oth@@ Raj Sharman @@oth@@ H Raghav Rao @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
167074555 |
| dewey-sort |
14 |
| id |
OLC1965363709 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965363709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714163739.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965363709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wencui Han</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Safety management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency communications systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">College campuses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency preparedness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compliance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States--US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serkan Ada</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raj Sharman</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H Raghav Rao</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Management information systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">39(2015), 4, Seite 909</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)167074555</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)405089-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018206689</subfield><subfield code="x">0276-7783</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:39</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">39</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">909</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wencui Han |
| spellingShingle |
Wencui Han ddc 004 misc Safety management misc Emergency communications systems misc College campuses misc Emergency preparedness misc Compliance misc Studies misc United States--US misc Federal legislation Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| authorStr |
Wencui Han |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)167074555 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science 070 - News media, journalism & publishing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0276-7783 |
| topic_title |
004 070 DNB Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts Safety management Emergency communications systems College campuses Emergency preparedness Compliance Studies United States--US Federal legislation |
| topic |
ddc 004 misc Safety management misc Emergency communications systems misc College campuses misc Emergency preparedness misc Compliance misc Studies misc United States--US misc Federal legislation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 misc Safety management misc Emergency communications systems misc College campuses misc Emergency preparedness misc Compliance misc Studies misc United States--US misc Federal legislation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 004 misc Safety management misc Emergency communications systems misc College campuses misc Emergency preparedness misc Compliance misc Studies misc United States--US misc Federal legislation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
s a sa r s rs h r r hrr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Management information systems |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
167074555 |
| dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems 070 - News media, journalism & publishing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Management information systems |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)167074555 (DE-600)405089-7 (DE-576)018206689 |
| title |
Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1965363709 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709 (PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0 (KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff |
| title_full |
Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| author_sort |
Wencui Han |
| journal |
Management information systems |
| journalStr |
Management information systems |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
909 |
| author_browse |
Wencui Han |
| container_volume |
39 |
| class |
004 070 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wencui Han |
| dewey-full |
004 070 |
| title_sort |
campus emergency notification systems: an examination of factors affecting compliance with alerts |
| title_auth |
Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| abstract |
The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. |
| abstractGer |
The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4336 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Serkan Ada Raj Sharman H Raghav Rao |
| author2Str |
Serkan Ada Raj Sharman H Raghav Rao |
| ppnlink |
167074555 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:28:44.079Z |
| _version_ |
1803579790803861504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965363709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714163739.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965363709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965363709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p803-cfa6258efb3986dd0237c05504f2d2ae13c7994dc9a48c53244ec8a2b4b7276b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0043533320150000039000400909campusemergencynotificationsystemsanexaminationoff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wencui Han</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Campus Emergency Notification Systems: An Examination of Factors Affecting Compliance with Alerts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The increasing number of campus-related emergency incidents, in combination with the requirements imposed by the Clery Act, have prompted college campuses to develop emergency notification systems to inform community members of extreme events that may affect them. Merely deploying emergency notification systems on college campuses, however, does not guarantee that these systems will be effective; student compliance plays a very important role in establishing such effectiveness. Immediate compliance with alerts, as opposed to delayed compliance or noncompliance, is a key factor in improving student safety on campuses. This paper investigates the critical antecedents that motivate students to comply immediately with messages from campus emergency notification systems. Drawing on Etzioni's compliance theory, a model is developed. Using a scenario-based survey method, the model is tested in five types of events -- snowstorm, active shooter, building fire, health-related, and robbery -- and with more than 800 college students from the Northern region of the United States. The results from this study suggest that subjective norm and information quality trust are, in general, the most important factors that promote immediate compliance. This research contributes to the literature on compliance, emergency notification systems, and emergency response policies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Safety management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency communications systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">College campuses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency preparedness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compliance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States--US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serkan Ada</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raj Sharman</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">H Raghav Rao</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Management information systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Minneapolis, MN : Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">39(2015), 4, Seite 909</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)167074555</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)405089-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018206689</subfield><subfield code="x">0276-7783</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:39</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733189943</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">39</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">909</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398116 |