Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint
Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage betwe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Tuninetti, Marta [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Water resources research - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965, 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; year:2015 ; number:10 ; pages:8257-8272 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1002/2015WR017148 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1965566049 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1965566049 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220221191539.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/2015WR017148 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1965566049 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q DNB |
084 | |a 38.85 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Tuninetti, Marta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. | ||
650 | 4 | |a virtual water content | |
650 | 4 | |a multicropping practices | |
650 | 4 | |a crop production | |
650 | 4 | |a spatial heterogeneity | |
650 | 4 | |a water efficiency | |
650 | 4 | |a sensitivity analysis | |
700 | 1 | |a Tamea, Stefania |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a D'Odorico, Paolo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Laio, Francesco |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ridolfi, Luca |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Water resources research |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 |g 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 |w (DE-627)129088285 |w (DE-600)5564-5 |w (DE-576)014422980 |x 0043-1397 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2015 |g number:10 |g pages:8257-8272 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 38.85 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 51 |j 2015 |e 10 |h 8257-8272 |
author_variant |
m t mt |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00431397:2015----::lblestvtohgrsltoetmtsf |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
38.85 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1002/2015WR017148 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB 38.85 bkl Tuninetti, Marta verfasserin aut Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis Tamea, Stefania oth D'Odorico, Paolo oth Laio, Francesco oth Ridolfi, Luca oth Enthalten in Water resources research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 (DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 0043-1397 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 38.85 AVZ AR 51 2015 10 8257-8272 |
spelling |
10.1002/2015WR017148 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB 38.85 bkl Tuninetti, Marta verfasserin aut Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis Tamea, Stefania oth D'Odorico, Paolo oth Laio, Francesco oth Ridolfi, Luca oth Enthalten in Water resources research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 (DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 0043-1397 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 38.85 AVZ AR 51 2015 10 8257-8272 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1002/2015WR017148 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB 38.85 bkl Tuninetti, Marta verfasserin aut Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis Tamea, Stefania oth D'Odorico, Paolo oth Laio, Francesco oth Ridolfi, Luca oth Enthalten in Water resources research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 (DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 0043-1397 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 38.85 AVZ AR 51 2015 10 8257-8272 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1002/2015WR017148 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB 38.85 bkl Tuninetti, Marta verfasserin aut Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis Tamea, Stefania oth D'Odorico, Paolo oth Laio, Francesco oth Ridolfi, Luca oth Enthalten in Water resources research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 (DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 0043-1397 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 38.85 AVZ AR 51 2015 10 8257-8272 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1002/2015WR017148 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB 38.85 bkl Tuninetti, Marta verfasserin aut Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis Tamea, Stefania oth D'Odorico, Paolo oth Laio, Francesco oth Ridolfi, Luca oth Enthalten in Water resources research Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 (DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 0043-1397 nnns volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 38.85 AVZ AR 51 2015 10 8257-8272 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Water resources research 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Water resources research 51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272 volume:51 year:2015 number:10 pages:8257-8272 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Water resources research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tuninetti, Marta @@aut@@ Tamea, Stefania @@oth@@ D'Odorico, Paolo @@oth@@ Laio, Francesco @@oth@@ Ridolfi, Luca @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129088285 |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
OLC1965566049 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965566049</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220221191539.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/2015WR017148</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965566049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tuninetti, Marta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">virtual water content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multicropping practices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">crop production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spatial heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sensitivity analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamea, Stefania</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D'Odorico, Paolo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laio, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ridolfi, Luca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Water resources research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129088285</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)5564-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014422980</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-1397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8257-8272</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="h">8257-8272</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Tuninetti, Marta |
spellingShingle |
Tuninetti, Marta ddc 550 bkl 38.85 misc virtual water content misc multicropping practices misc crop production misc spatial heterogeneity misc water efficiency misc sensitivity analysis Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
authorStr |
Tuninetti, Marta |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129088285 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0043-1397 |
topic_title |
550 DNB 38.85 bkl Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint virtual water content multicropping practices crop production spatial heterogeneity water efficiency sensitivity analysis |
topic |
ddc 550 bkl 38.85 misc virtual water content misc multicropping practices misc crop production misc spatial heterogeneity misc water efficiency misc sensitivity analysis |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 bkl 38.85 misc virtual water content misc multicropping practices misc crop production misc spatial heterogeneity misc water efficiency misc sensitivity analysis |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 bkl 38.85 misc virtual water content misc multicropping practices misc crop production misc spatial heterogeneity misc water efficiency misc sensitivity analysis |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
s t st p d pd f l fl l r lr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Water resources research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129088285 |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Water resources research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129088285 (DE-600)5564-5 (DE-576)014422980 |
title |
Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1965566049 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049 (PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520 (KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa |
title_full |
Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
author_sort |
Tuninetti, Marta |
journal |
Water resources research |
journalStr |
Water resources research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
8257 |
author_browse |
Tuninetti, Marta |
container_volume |
51 |
class |
550 DNB 38.85 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Tuninetti, Marta |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/2015WR017148 |
dewey-full |
550 |
title_sort |
global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
title_auth |
Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
abstract |
Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate |
abstractGer |
Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate |
abstract_unstemmed |
Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4219 |
container_issue |
10 |
title_short |
Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Tamea, Stefania D'Odorico, Paolo Laio, Francesco Ridolfi, Luca |
author2Str |
Tamea, Stefania D'Odorico, Paolo Laio, Francesco Ridolfi, Luca |
ppnlink |
129088285 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1002/2015WR017148 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:18:58.171Z |
_version_ |
1803582951307345920 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965566049</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220221191539.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/2015WR017148</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965566049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965566049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1268-99a27cb9a0fa22472f1df1181d2584b7a8f0c89df2ac155ba446ad8c819756520</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0046260820150000051001008257globalsensitivityofhighresolutionestimatesofcropwa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tuninetti, Marta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Global sensitivity of high‐resolution estimates of crop water footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Most of the human appropriation of freshwater resources is for agriculture. Water availability is a major constraint to mankind's ability to produce food. The notion of virtual water content ( VWC ), also known as crop water footprint, provides an effective tool to investigate the linkage between food and water resources as a function of climate, soil, and agricultural practices. The spatial variability in the virtual water content of crops is here explored, disentangling its dependency on climate and crop yields and assessing the sensitivity of VWC estimates to parameter variability and uncertainty. Here we calculate the virtual water content of four staple crops (i.e., wheat, rice, maize, and soybean) for the entire world developing a high‐resolution (5 × 5 arc min) model, and we evaluate the VWC sensitivity to input parameters. We find that food production almost entirely depends on green water (>90%), but, when applied, irrigation makes crop production more water efficient, thus requiring less water. The spatial variability of the VWC is mostly controlled by the spatial patterns of crop yields with an average correlation coefficient of 0.83. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that wheat is most sensitive to the length of the growing period, rice to reference evapotranspiration, maize and soybean to the crop planting date. The VWC sensitivity varies not only among crops, but also across the harvested areas of the world, even at the subnational scale. The virtual water content of crops is highly variable in space VWC high‐resolution maps are obtained with up‐to‐date data sets The VWC is most sensitive to agricultural practices than climate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">virtual water content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multicropping practices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">crop production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spatial heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sensitivity analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamea, Stefania</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D'Odorico, Paolo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laio, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ridolfi, Luca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Water resources research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2015), 10, Seite 8257-8272</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129088285</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)5564-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014422980</subfield><subfield code="x">0043-1397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8257-8272</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017148</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015WR017148/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1757743639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.85</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="h">8257-8272</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3986673 |