A systematic literature review of use case specifications research
Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usabil...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Saurabh Tiwari [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Information and software technology - London : Butterworth, 1987, 67(2015), Seite 128-158 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:67 ; year:2015 ; pages:128-158 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1965850758 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1965850758 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220216165213.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1965850758 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |a 004 |q DNB |
084 | |a 54.50 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 0 | |a Saurabh Tiwari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Systems development | |
650 | 4 | |a Software engineering | |
650 | 4 | |a Specifications | |
650 | 4 | |a Software quality | |
700 | 0 | |a Atul Gupta |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Information and software technology |d London : Butterworth, 1987 |g 67(2015), Seite 128-158 |w (DE-627)130403393 |w (DE-600)607616-6 |w (DE-576)015907074 |x 0950-5849 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2015 |g pages:128-158 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 54.50 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 67 |j 2015 |h 128-158 |
author_variant |
s t st |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09505849:2015----::sseailtrtrrveoueaepcf |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
54.50 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl Saurabh Tiwari verfasserin aut A systematic literature review of use case specifications research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality Atul Gupta oth Enthalten in Information and software technology London : Butterworth, 1987 67(2015), Seite 128-158 (DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 0950-5849 nnns volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 54.50 AVZ AR 67 2015 128-158 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl Saurabh Tiwari verfasserin aut A systematic literature review of use case specifications research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality Atul Gupta oth Enthalten in Information and software technology London : Butterworth, 1987 67(2015), Seite 128-158 (DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 0950-5849 nnns volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 54.50 AVZ AR 67 2015 128-158 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl Saurabh Tiwari verfasserin aut A systematic literature review of use case specifications research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality Atul Gupta oth Enthalten in Information and software technology London : Butterworth, 1987 67(2015), Seite 128-158 (DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 0950-5849 nnns volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 54.50 AVZ AR 67 2015 128-158 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl Saurabh Tiwari verfasserin aut A systematic literature review of use case specifications research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality Atul Gupta oth Enthalten in Information and software technology London : Butterworth, 1987 67(2015), Seite 128-158 (DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 0950-5849 nnns volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 54.50 AVZ AR 67 2015 128-158 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl Saurabh Tiwari verfasserin aut A systematic literature review of use case specifications research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality Atul Gupta oth Enthalten in Information and software technology London : Butterworth, 1987 67(2015), Seite 128-158 (DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 0950-5849 nnns volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 54.50 AVZ AR 67 2015 128-158 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Information and software technology 67(2015), Seite 128-158 volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Information and software technology 67(2015), Seite 128-158 volume:67 year:2015 pages:128-158 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Information and software technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Saurabh Tiwari @@aut@@ Atul Gupta @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130403393 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
OLC1965850758 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965850758</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216165213.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965850758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saurabh Tiwari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A systematic literature review of use case specifications research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systems development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Atul Gupta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Information and software technology</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Butterworth, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2015), Seite 128-158</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130403393</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)607616-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015907074</subfield><subfield code="x">0950-5849</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:128-158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.50</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">128-158</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Saurabh Tiwari |
spellingShingle |
Saurabh Tiwari ddc 330 bkl 54.50 misc Studies misc Systems development misc Software engineering misc Specifications misc Software quality A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
authorStr |
Saurabh Tiwari |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130403393 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 004 - Data processing & computer science |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0950-5849 |
topic_title |
330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl A systematic literature review of use case specifications research Studies Systems development Software engineering Specifications Software quality |
topic |
ddc 330 bkl 54.50 misc Studies misc Systems development misc Software engineering misc Specifications misc Software quality |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 bkl 54.50 misc Studies misc Systems development misc Software engineering misc Specifications misc Software quality |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 bkl 54.50 misc Studies misc Systems development misc Software engineering misc Specifications misc Software quality |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
a g ag |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Information and software technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130403393 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
hierarchy_top_title |
Information and software technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130403393 (DE-600)607616-6 (DE-576)015907074 |
title |
A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1965850758 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758 (PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0 (KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr |
title_full |
A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
author_sort |
Saurabh Tiwari |
journal |
Information and software technology |
journalStr |
Information and software technology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 000 - Computer science, information & general works |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
128 |
author_browse |
Saurabh Tiwari |
container_volume |
67 |
class |
330 004 DNB 54.50 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Saurabh Tiwari |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 |
dewey-full |
330 004 |
title_sort |
systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
title_auth |
A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
abstract |
Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. |
abstractGer |
Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_4318 |
title_short |
A systematic literature review of use case specifications research |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Atul Gupta |
author2Str |
Atul Gupta |
ppnlink |
130403393 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:23:28.634Z |
_version_ |
1803587009785102336 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965850758</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216165213.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965850758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965850758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1858-51798c032d67babf330e478469b763d3e8fe1be9462b8197dfb02397778f9e5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0050086020150000067000000128systematicliteraturereviewofusecasespecificationsr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saurabh Tiwari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A systematic literature review of use case specifications research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Use cases have been widely accepted and acknowledged as a specification tool for specifying the functional requirements of a software system. Many variations of use cases exist which tries to address the issues such as their completeness, degree of formalism, automated information extraction, usability, and pertinence. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature for the evolution of the use cases, their applications, quality assessments, open issues, and the future directions. This paper performs keyword-based extensive search to identify the relevant studies related to use case specifications research reported in journal articles, conference papers, workshop papers, bulletins and book chapters. The specified search process resulted 119 papers, which were published between 1992 and February 2014. This included, 54 journal articles, 42 conference papers, 2 ACM/IEEE bulletins, 12 book chapters, 6 workshop papers and 3 white papers. This paper found that as many as twenty use case templates have been proposed and applied for various software specification problems ranging from informal descriptions with paragraph-style text to more formal keyword-oriented templates. Use cases have been evolved from initial plain, semi-formal textual descriptions to a more formal template structure facilitating automated information extraction in various software development life cycle activities such as requirement documentation, requirement analysis, requirement validation, domain modeling, test case generation, planning and estimation, and maintenance. The issues that remain to be sorted out are (1) the right degree of formalism, (2) the efficient change management, (3) the industrial relevance, and (4) assessment of the quality of the specification. Additionally, its synergy with other software models that are used in the development processes is an issue that needs to be addressed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systems development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Atul Gupta</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Information and software technology</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Butterworth, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2015), Seite 128-158</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130403393</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)607616-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015907074</subfield><subfield code="x">0950-5849</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:128-158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.06.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1716946569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.50</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">128-158</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401575 |