Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics

This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on n...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Michelle Kosch [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of the history of philosophy - Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963, 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:53 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:111-132

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1353/hph.2015.0014

Katalog-ID:	OLC1965915981

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1965915981
003	DE-627
005	20220216152741.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1353/hph.2015.0014 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1965915981
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981
035			\|a (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390
035			\|a (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 100 \|q DNB
084			\|a PHILOS \|2 fid
084			\|a HIST \|2 fid
084			\|a LING \|2 fid
084			\|a 08.00 \|2 bkl
100	0		\|a Michelle Kosch \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.
650		4	\|a Philosophy, German
650		4	\|a Ethics
650		4	\|a Analysis
650		4	\|a German language
650		4	\|a Philosophy
650		4	\|a Philosophers
650		4	\|a Self interest
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of the history of philosophy \|d Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 \|g 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 \|w (DE-627)129553093 \|w (DE-600)219913-0 \|w (DE-576)015008770 \|x 0022-5053 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:53 \|g year:2015 \|g number:1 \|g pages:111-132
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-PHILOS
912			\|a FID-HIST
912			\|a FID-LING
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHI
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_50
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_72
912			\|a GBV_ILN_130
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4082
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4193
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4310
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4311
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4314
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4315
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4317
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 08.00 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 53 \|j 2015 \|e 1 \|h 111-132

Indexfelder

author_variant	m k mk
matchkey_str	article:00225053:2015----::ihenataimnieenh
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	08.00
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1353/hph.2015.0014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Michelle Kosch verfasserin aut Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy. Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 (DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770 0022-5053 nnns volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 08.00 AVZ AR 53 2015 1 111-132
spelling	10.1353/hph.2015.0014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Michelle Kosch verfasserin aut Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy. Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 (DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770 0022-5053 nnns volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 08.00 AVZ AR 53 2015 1 111-132
allfields_unstemmed	10.1353/hph.2015.0014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Michelle Kosch verfasserin aut Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy. Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 (DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770 0022-5053 nnns volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 08.00 AVZ AR 53 2015 1 111-132
allfieldsGer	10.1353/hph.2015.0014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Michelle Kosch verfasserin aut Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy. Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 (DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770 0022-5053 nnns volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 08.00 AVZ AR 53 2015 1 111-132
allfieldsSound	10.1353/hph.2015.0014 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Michelle Kosch verfasserin aut Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy. Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 (DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770 0022-5053 nnns volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 08.00 AVZ AR 53 2015 1 111-132
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of the history of philosophy 53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132 volume:53 year:2015 number:1 pages:111-132
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest
dewey-raw	100
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of the history of philosophy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Michelle Kosch @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129553093
dewey-sort	3100
id	OLC1965915981
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965915981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216152741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1353/hph.2015.0014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965915981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HIST</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">08.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michelle Kosch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, German</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">German language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self interest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the history of philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129553093</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219913-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015008770</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-5053</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-132</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-HIST</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">08.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">111-132</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Michelle Kosch
spellingShingle	Michelle Kosch ddc 100 fid PHILOS fid HIST fid LING bkl 08.00 misc Philosophy, German misc Ethics misc Analysis misc German language misc Philosophy misc Philosophers misc Self interest Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
authorStr	Michelle Kosch
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129553093
format	Article
dewey-ones	100 - Philosophy & psychology
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0022-5053
topic_title	100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics Philosophy, German Ethics Analysis German language Philosophy Philosophers Self interest
topic	ddc 100 fid PHILOS fid HIST fid LING bkl 08.00 misc Philosophy, German misc Ethics misc Analysis misc German language misc Philosophy misc Philosophers misc Self interest
topic_unstemmed	ddc 100 fid PHILOS fid HIST fid LING bkl 08.00 misc Philosophy, German misc Ethics misc Analysis misc German language misc Philosophy misc Philosophers misc Self interest
topic_browse	ddc 100 fid PHILOS fid HIST fid LING bkl 08.00 misc Philosophy, German misc Ethics misc Analysis misc German language misc Philosophy misc Philosophers misc Self interest
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of the history of philosophy
hierarchy_parent_id	129553093
dewey-tens	100 - Philosophy
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of the history of philosophy
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129553093 (DE-600)219913-0 (DE-576)015008770
title	Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1965915981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981 (PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390 (KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics
title_full	Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
author_sort	Michelle Kosch
journal	Journal of the history of philosophy
journalStr	Journal of the history of philosophy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	100 - Philosophy & psychology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	111
author_browse	Michelle Kosch
container_volume	53
class	100 DNB PHILOS fid HIST fid LING fid 08.00 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Michelle Kosch
doi_str_mv	10.1353/hph.2015.0014
dewey-full	100
title_sort	fichtean kantianism in nineteenth-century ethics
title_auth	Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
abstract	This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.
abstractGer	This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.
abstract_unstemmed	This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-HIST FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_50 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	129553093
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1353/hph.2015.0014
up_date	2024-07-03T19:39:16.201Z
_version_	1803588003380068352
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1965915981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216152741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1353/hph.2015.0014</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1965915981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1965915981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1725-804fa3938db8e642cd1216db8592f482584374a756daa9d0b769a94266decd390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0051031920150000053000100111fichteankantianisminnineteenthcenturyethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HIST</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">08.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michelle Kosch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. "Kantianism" during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte's System of Ethics than by any of Kant's own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant's and Fichte's ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte's status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate die basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte's System of Ethics, which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, German</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">German language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self interest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the history of philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1963</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2015), 1, Seite 111-132</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129553093</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219913-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015008770</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-5053</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-132</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0014</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1655245501</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-HIST</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">08.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">111-132</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399373

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?