We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration
In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequate...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jilke, Sebastian [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Systematik: |
|
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Public administration review - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940, 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:75 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:36-48 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/puar.12318 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1966248563 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1966248563 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220217011007.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/puar.12318 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1966248563 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a MA 1000: |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 88.10 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 89.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jilke, Sebastian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration | ||
| 540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Public administration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Customer satisfaction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public services | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Measurement techniques | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Polls & surveys | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meuleman, Bart |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van de Walle, Steven |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Public administration review |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 |g 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 |w (DE-627)129507431 |w (DE-600)209502-6 |w (DE-576)01491266X |x 0033-3352 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:36-48 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-INTRECHT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a MA 1000: |
| 936 | b | k | |a 88.10 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 89.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 75 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 36-48 | ||
| author_variant |
s j sj |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00333352:2015----::eedooprbtomaueetqiaecicmaaie |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
88.10 89.00 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1111/puar.12318 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl Jilke, Sebastian verfasserin aut We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International Meuleman, Bart oth Van de Walle, Steven oth Enthalten in Public administration review Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 (DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X 0033-3352 nnns volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 MA 1000: 88.10 AVZ 89.00 AVZ AR 75 2015 1 36-48 |
| spelling |
10.1111/puar.12318 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl Jilke, Sebastian verfasserin aut We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International Meuleman, Bart oth Van de Walle, Steven oth Enthalten in Public administration review Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 (DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X 0033-3352 nnns volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 MA 1000: 88.10 AVZ 89.00 AVZ AR 75 2015 1 36-48 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/puar.12318 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl Jilke, Sebastian verfasserin aut We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International Meuleman, Bart oth Van de Walle, Steven oth Enthalten in Public administration review Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 (DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X 0033-3352 nnns volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 MA 1000: 88.10 AVZ 89.00 AVZ AR 75 2015 1 36-48 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/puar.12318 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl Jilke, Sebastian verfasserin aut We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International Meuleman, Bart oth Van de Walle, Steven oth Enthalten in Public administration review Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 (DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X 0033-3352 nnns volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 MA 1000: 88.10 AVZ 89.00 AVZ AR 75 2015 1 36-48 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/puar.12318 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl Jilke, Sebastian verfasserin aut We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration © COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International Meuleman, Bart oth Van de Walle, Steven oth Enthalten in Public administration review Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 (DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X 0033-3352 nnns volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 MA 1000: 88.10 AVZ 89.00 AVZ AR 75 2015 1 36-48 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Public administration review 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Public administration review 75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 volume:75 year:2015 number:1 pages:36-48 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Public administration review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jilke, Sebastian @@aut@@ Meuleman, Bart @@oth@@ Van de Walle, Steven @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129507431 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1966248563 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1966248563</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217011007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/puar.12318</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1966248563</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">88.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jilke, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Customer satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Measurement techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polls & surveys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meuleman, Bart</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Van de Walle, Steven</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public administration review</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129507431</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)209502-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01491266X</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-3352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:36-48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">88.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">36-48</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jilke, Sebastian |
| spellingShingle |
Jilke, Sebastian ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk MA 1000: bkl 88.10 bkl 89.00 misc Public administration misc Research misc Customer satisfaction misc Public services misc Measurement techniques misc Polls & surveys misc Comparability misc International We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| authorStr |
Jilke, Sebastian |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129507431 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0033-3352 |
| topic_title |
340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration Public administration Research Customer satisfaction Public services Measurement techniques Polls & surveys Comparability International |
| topic |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk MA 1000: bkl 88.10 bkl 89.00 misc Public administration misc Research misc Customer satisfaction misc Public services misc Measurement techniques misc Polls & surveys misc Comparability misc International |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk MA 1000: bkl 88.10 bkl 89.00 misc Public administration misc Research misc Customer satisfaction misc Public services misc Measurement techniques misc Polls & surveys misc Comparability misc International |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk MA 1000: bkl 88.10 bkl 89.00 misc Public administration misc Research misc Customer satisfaction misc Public services misc Measurement techniques misc Polls & surveys misc Comparability misc International |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
b m bm d w s v dws dwsv |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Public administration review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129507431 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Public administration review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129507431 (DE-600)209502-6 (DE-576)01491266X |
| title |
We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1966248563 (DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563 (PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30 (KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa |
| title_full |
We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| author_sort |
Jilke, Sebastian |
| journal |
Public administration review |
| journalStr |
Public administration review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
36 |
| author_browse |
Jilke, Sebastian |
| container_volume |
75 |
| class |
340 DNB INTRECHT fid MA 1000: AVZ rvk 88.10 bkl 89.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jilke, Sebastian |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/puar.12318 |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
we need to compare, but how? measurement equivalence in comparative public administration |
| title_auth |
We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| abstract |
In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. |
| abstractGer |
In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Meuleman, Bart Van de Walle, Steven |
| author2Str |
Meuleman, Bart Van de Walle, Steven |
| ppnlink |
129507431 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1111/puar.12318 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:55:48.253Z |
| _version_ |
1803592818498732032 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1966248563</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217011007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/puar.12318</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1966248563</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1966248563</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2988-73f5578cc616230e092552f23a8a143293b0835950cb712b182f1d0c675c94b30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0055392120150000075000100036weneedtocomparebuthowmeasurementequivalenceincompa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">88.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jilke, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">We Need to Compare, but How? Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In addition to public administrations and public managers, there is increasing interest in studying citizens’ interactions with and views toward government from a comparative perspective in order to put theories to the test using cross‐national surveys. However, this will only succeed if we adequately deal with the diverse ways in which respondents in different countries and regions perceive and respond to survey measures. This article examines the concept of cross‐national measurement equivalence in public administration research and explores methods for establishing equivalence. Two methodologies are examined that test and correct for measurement nonequivalence: multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis and multilevel mixture item response theory. These techniques are used to test and establish the cross‐national measurement equivalence of two popular measurement constructs: citizen satisfaction with public services and trust in public institutions. Results show that appropriately dealing with nonequivalence accounts for different forms of biases that otherwise would be undetected. The article contributes to the methodological advancement in studying public administration beyond domestic borders.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Customer satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Measurement techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polls & surveys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meuleman, Bart</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Van de Walle, Steven</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public administration review</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1940</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2015), 1, Seite 36-48</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129507431</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)209502-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)01491266X</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-3352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:36-48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12318</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12318/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1733614656</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">88.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">36-48</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400819 |