Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model

Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical po...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Eckehard Rosenbaum [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of post-Keynesian economics - Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978, 37(2015), 4, Seite 623
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:37 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:623

Links:	Link aufrufen

Katalog-ID:	OLC1968006443

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1968006443
003	DE-627
005	20230714171835.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1968006443
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443
035			\|a (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0
035			\|a (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 17 \|a 330 \|a 380 \|a 650 \|a 670 \|q DNB
082	0	4	\|a 300 \|q AVZ
100	0		\|a Eckehard Rosenbaum \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.
650		4	\|a Growth rate
650		4	\|a Growth models
650		4	\|a Studies
650		4	\|a Economic growth
650		4	\|a Recessions
650		4	\|a Keynesian theory
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of post-Keynesian economics \|d Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 \|g 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 \|w (DE-627)130055077 \|w (DE-600)436253-6 \|w (DE-576)015592626 \|x 0160-3477 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:37 \|g year:2015 \|g number:4 \|g pages:623
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4317
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 37 \|j 2015 \|e 4 \|h 623

Indexfelder

author_variant	e r er
matchkey_str	article:01603477:2015----::eorwhnsrcuacagiaotens
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
publishDate	2015
allfields	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Eckehard Rosenbaum verfasserin aut Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth. Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 (DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626 0160-3477 nnns volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2015 4 623
spelling	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Eckehard Rosenbaum verfasserin aut Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth. Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 (DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626 0160-3477 nnns volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2015 4 623
allfields_unstemmed	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Eckehard Rosenbaum verfasserin aut Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth. Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 (DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626 0160-3477 nnns volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2015 4 623
allfieldsGer	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Eckehard Rosenbaum verfasserin aut Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth. Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 (DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626 0160-3477 nnns volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2015 4 623
allfieldsSound	PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Eckehard Rosenbaum verfasserin aut Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth. Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 (DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626 0160-3477 nnns volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2015 4 623
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of post-Keynesian economics 37(2015), 4, Seite 623 volume:37 year:2015 number:4 pages:623
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory
dewey-raw	17
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of post-Keynesian economics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Eckehard Rosenbaum @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	130055077
dewey-sort	217
id	OLC1968006443
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1968006443</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714171835.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1968006443</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">17</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eckehard Rosenbaum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Growth rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Growth models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recessions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Keynesian theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of post-Keynesian economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2015), 4, Seite 623</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130055077</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)436253-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015592626</subfield><subfield code="x">0160-3477</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">623</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Eckehard Rosenbaum
spellingShingle	Eckehard Rosenbaum ddc 17 ddc 300 misc Growth rate misc Growth models misc Studies misc Economic growth misc Recessions misc Keynesian theory Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
authorStr	Eckehard Rosenbaum
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)130055077
format	Article
dewey-ones	017 - General subject catalogs 330 - Economics 380 - Commerce, communications & transportation 650 - Management & auxiliary services 670 - Manufacturing 300 - Social sciences
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0160-3477
topic_title	17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model Growth rate Growth models Studies Economic growth Recessions Keynesian theory
topic	ddc 17 ddc 300 misc Growth rate misc Growth models misc Studies misc Economic growth misc Recessions misc Keynesian theory
topic_unstemmed	ddc 17 ddc 300 misc Growth rate misc Growth models misc Studies misc Economic growth misc Recessions misc Keynesian theory
topic_browse	ddc 17 ddc 300 misc Growth rate misc Growth models misc Studies misc Economic growth misc Recessions misc Keynesian theory
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of post-Keynesian economics
hierarchy_parent_id	130055077
dewey-tens	010 - Bibliographies 330 - Economics 380 - Commerce, communications & transportation 650 - Management & public relations 670 - Manufacturing 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of post-Keynesian economics
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)130055077 (DE-600)436253-6 (DE-576)015592626
title	Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1968006443 (DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443 (PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0 (KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt
title_full	Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
author_sort	Eckehard Rosenbaum
journal	Journal of post-Keynesian economics
journalStr	Journal of post-Keynesian economics
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	000 - Computer science, information & general works 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	623
author_browse	Eckehard Rosenbaum
container_volume	37
class	17 330 380 650 670 DNB 300 AVZ
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Eckehard Rosenbaum
dewey-full	17 330 380 650 670 300
title_sort	zero growth and structural change in a post keynesian growth model
title_auth	Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
abstract	Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.
abstractGer	Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.
abstract_unstemmed	Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model
url	http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	130055077
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-04T02:24:26.656Z
_version_	1803613494739730432
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1968006443</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714171835.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1968006443</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1968006443</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1116-2108dcd741cf2a6acccef5bd977897614e07337a0091590fa61d2cb19f5710cc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0090374420150000037000400623zerogrowthandstructuralchangeinapostkeynesiangrowt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">17</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eckehard Rosenbaum</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Continuous albeit oscillating economic growth has become a hallmark of modern economies. Arguing on the basis of theoretical models, some authors maintain that growth is even a systemic requirement of capitalist economies. Thus the latter remain only stable as long as they grow. From an empirical point of view, phases of negative growth (recessions) often go hand in hand with economically and socially detrimental side effects, which policymakers seek to avoid at virtually all costs. This is why a stagnant or even degrowing economy is also anathema to policymakers and arguably to the public at large. Concomitantly, economic research has focused mainly on the drivers of growth rather than the conditions under which stagnant economies can exist. The present paper seeks to contribute to the analysis of stagnant economies by investigating the interrelationship of zero growth and technological progress in the context of a Kaleckian growth model. The analysis starts by showing that a Kaleckian model allows zero growth if depreciation is taken into account and if animal spirits are somewhat (but not too) pessimistic. Combining these conditions with technological progress and wage bargaining, further analysis then indicates that in a profit-driven economy, the overall stability of the system is no longer guaranteed if zero growth is actively imposed, leading to a downward spiral, while in a wage-driven economy, stability can be induced under conditions of zero growth and technological progress but it may not be guaranteed for positive growth.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Growth rate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Growth models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recessions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Keynesian theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of post-Keynesian economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2015), 4, Seite 623</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130055077</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)436253-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015592626</subfield><subfield code="x">0160-3477</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1717299527</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">623</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4014044

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Zero growth and structural change in a post Keynesian growth model

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?