The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets
The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its se...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Nicholson, Uisdean [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Basin research - Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988, 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:273-297 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/bre.12110 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1973119323 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1973119323 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714184127.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160427s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bre.12110 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160430 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1973119323 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Nicholson, Uisdean |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Es, Bas |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Clift, Peter D |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Flecker, Rachel |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Macdonald, David I. M |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Basin research |d Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 |g 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 |w (DE-627)130846252 |w (DE-600)1022981-4 |w (DE-576)023095601 |x 0950-091X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:273-297 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2399 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 273-297 | ||
| author_variant |
u n un |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:0950091X:2016----::hsdmnayntcoieouinfhaurvrnnrhahlnainwvdnermesisrtg |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1111/bre.12110 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB Nicholson, Uisdean verfasserin aut The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists Es, Bas oth Clift, Peter D oth Flecker, Rachel oth Macdonald, David I. M oth Enthalten in Basin research Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 (DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 0950-091X nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 28 2016 2 273-297 |
| spelling |
10.1111/bre.12110 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB Nicholson, Uisdean verfasserin aut The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists Es, Bas oth Clift, Peter D oth Flecker, Rachel oth Macdonald, David I. M oth Enthalten in Basin research Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 (DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 0950-091X nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 28 2016 2 273-297 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/bre.12110 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB Nicholson, Uisdean verfasserin aut The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists Es, Bas oth Clift, Peter D oth Flecker, Rachel oth Macdonald, David I. M oth Enthalten in Basin research Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 (DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 0950-091X nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 28 2016 2 273-297 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/bre.12110 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB Nicholson, Uisdean verfasserin aut The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists Es, Bas oth Clift, Peter D oth Flecker, Rachel oth Macdonald, David I. M oth Enthalten in Basin research Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 (DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 0950-091X nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 28 2016 2 273-297 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/bre.12110 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 DNB Nicholson, Uisdean verfasserin aut The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists Es, Bas oth Clift, Peter D oth Flecker, Rachel oth Macdonald, David I. M oth Enthalten in Basin research Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 (DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 0950-091X nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 28 2016 2 273-297 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Basin research 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Basin research 28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297 volume:28 year:2016 number:2 pages:273-297 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
550 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Basin research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Nicholson, Uisdean @@aut@@ Es, Bas @@oth@@ Clift, Peter D @@oth@@ Flecker, Rachel @@oth@@ Macdonald, David I. M @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130846252 |
| dewey-sort |
3550 |
| id |
OLC1973119323 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1973119323</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714184127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160427s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/bre.12110</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1973119323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicholson, Uisdean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Es, Bas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clift, Peter D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Flecker, Rachel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Macdonald, David I. M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Basin research</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130846252</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1022981-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023095601</subfield><subfield code="x">0950-091X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:273-297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">273-297</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Nicholson, Uisdean |
| spellingShingle |
Nicholson, Uisdean ddc 550 The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| authorStr |
Nicholson, Uisdean |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130846252 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0950-091X |
| topic_title |
550 DNB The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| topic |
ddc 550 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 550 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
b e be p d c pd pdc r f rf d i m m dim dimm |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Basin research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130846252 |
| dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Basin research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130846252 (DE-600)1022981-4 (DE-576)023095601 |
| title |
The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1973119323 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323 (PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0 (KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno |
| title_full |
The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| author_sort |
Nicholson, Uisdean |
| journal |
Basin research |
| journalStr |
Basin research |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
273 |
| author_browse |
Nicholson, Uisdean |
| container_volume |
28 |
| class |
550 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Nicholson, Uisdean |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/bre.12110 |
| dewey-full |
550 |
| title_sort |
sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the amur river and north sakhalin basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and neogene–recent sediment budgets |
| title_auth |
The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| abstract |
The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. |
| abstractGer |
The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_2399 GBV_ILN_4112 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Es, Bas Clift, Peter D Flecker, Rachel Macdonald, David I. M |
| author2Str |
Es, Bas Clift, Peter D Flecker, Rachel Macdonald, David I. M |
| ppnlink |
130846252 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1111/bre.12110 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:40:22.706Z |
| _version_ |
1803610722358263808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1973119323</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714184127.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160427s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/bre.12110</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1973119323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1973119323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1620-d40d2a97c9fc256d4d7d9ee3d409d71b91bfb584c21184210a5894ca56bd469a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0157875820160000028000200273sedimentaryandtectonicevolutionoftheamurriverandno</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicholson, Uisdean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Amur River and North Sakhalin Basin: new evidence from seismic stratigraphy and Neogene–Recent sediment budgets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The N orth S akhalin B asin in the western S ea of O khotsk has been the main site of sedimentation from the A mur R iver since the E arly M iocene. In this article, we present regional seismic reflection data and a N eogene– R ecent sediment budget to constrain the evolution of the basin and its sedimentary fill, and consider the implications for sediment flux from the A mur R iver, in particular testing models of continental‐scale N eogene drainage capture. The A mur‐derived basin‐fill history can be divided into five distinct stages: the first A mur‐derived sediments (>21–16.5 Ma) were deposited during a period of transtension along the S akhalin‐ H okkaido S hear Z one, with moderately high sediment flux to the basin (71 Mt year −1 ). The second stage sequence (16.5–10.4 Ma) was deposited following the cessation of transtension, and was characterised by a significant reduction in sediment flux (24 Mt year −1 ) and widespread retrogradation of deltaic sediments. The third (10.4–5.3 Ma) and fourth (5.3–2.5 Ma) stages were characterised by progradation of deltaic sediments and an associated increase in sediment flux (48–60 Mt year −1 ) to the basin. Significant uplift associated with regional transpression started during this time in southeastern S akhalin, but the north‐eastward propagating strain did not reach the NE shelf of S akhalin until the P leistocene (<2.5 Ma). This uplift event, still ongoing today, resulted in recycling of older deltaic sediments from the island of S akhalin, and contributed to a substantially increased total sediment flux to the adjacent basinal areas (165 Mt year −1 ). Adjusted rates to discount these local erosional products (117 Mt year −1 ) imply an A mur catchment‐wide increase in denudation rates during the L ate P liocene– P leistocene; however, this was likely a result of global climatic and eustatic effects, combined with tectonic processes within the A mur catchment and possibly a smaller drainage capture event by the S ungari tributary, rather than continental‐scale drainage capture involving the entire upper A mur catchment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2014 The Authors. Basin Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Es, Bas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clift, Peter D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Flecker, Rachel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Macdonald, David I. M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Basin research</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2016), 2, Seite 273-297</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130846252</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1022981-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023095601</subfield><subfield code="x">0950-091X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:273-297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12110</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12110/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768777890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">273-297</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400182 |