Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests

Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of par...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Schlagwörter:	Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth

Systematik:	PU 5000:

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Family law quarterly - Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967, 49(2016), 4, Seite 617
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:49 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; pages:617

Links:	Link aufrufen

Katalog-ID:	OLC1973880695

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1973880695
003	DE-627
005	20220215090257.0
007	tu
008	160430s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160430
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1973880695
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695
035			\|a (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270
035			\|a (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 340 \|q ZDB
084			\|a INTRECHT \|2 fid
084			\|a PU 5000: \|q AVZ \|2 rvk
084			\|a 86.22 \|2 bkl
245	1	0	\|a Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.
650		4	\|a Enforcement
650		4	\|a Divorce
650		4	\|a Contempt of court
650		4	\|a Parental rights
650		4	\|a Jurisdiction
650		4	\|a State court decisions
650		4	\|a Parents & parenting
650		4	\|a Families & family life
650		4	\|a Drug abuse
650		4	\|a Child welfare
650		4	\|a Financial statements
650		4	\|a Federal court decisions
650		4	\|a Family law
650		4	\|a Evidence
650		4	\|a Trials
650		4	\|a Children & youth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Family law quarterly \|d Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 \|g 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 \|w (DE-627)168185032 \|w (DE-600)700179-4 \|w (DE-576)015931773 \|x 0014-729X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:49 \|g year:2016 \|g number:4 \|g pages:617
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-INTRECHT
912			\|a SSG-OLC-JUR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2062
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
936	r	v	\|a PU 5000:
936	b	k	\|a 86.22 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 49 \|j 2016 \|e 4 \|h 617

Indexfelder

matchkey_str	article:0014729X:2016----::aiyaiteitsae2121
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
bklnumber	86.22
publishDate	2016
allfields	PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case. Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth Enthalten in Family law quarterly Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 (DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773 0014-729X nnns volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305 PU 5000: 86.22 AVZ AR 49 2016 4 617
spelling	PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case. Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth Enthalten in Family law quarterly Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 (DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773 0014-729X nnns volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305 PU 5000: 86.22 AVZ AR 49 2016 4 617
allfields_unstemmed	PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case. Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth Enthalten in Family law quarterly Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 (DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773 0014-729X nnns volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305 PU 5000: 86.22 AVZ AR 49 2016 4 617
allfieldsGer	PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case. Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth Enthalten in Family law quarterly Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 (DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773 0014-729X nnns volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305 PU 5000: 86.22 AVZ AR 49 2016 4 617
allfieldsSound	PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case. Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth Enthalten in Family law quarterly Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 (DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773 0014-729X nnns volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305 PU 5000: 86.22 AVZ AR 49 2016 4 617
language	English
source	Enthalten in Family law quarterly 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617
sourceStr	Enthalten in Family law quarterly 49(2016), 4, Seite 617 volume:49 year:2016 number:4 pages:617
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth
dewey-raw	340
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Family law quarterly
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	168185032
dewey-sort	3340
id	OLC1973880695
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1973880695</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215090257.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160430s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1973880695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 5000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.22</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Enforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divorce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contempt of court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parental rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">State court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parents & parenting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Families & family life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drug abuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Child welfare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Financial statements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Children & youth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Family law quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">49(2016), 4, Seite 617</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168185032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)700179-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015931773</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-729X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:49</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PU 5000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.22</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">49</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">617</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)168185032
format	Article
dewey-ones	340 - Law
delete_txt_mv	keep
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0014-729X
topic_title	340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests Enforcement Divorce Contempt of court Parental rights Jurisdiction State court decisions Parents & parenting Families & family life Drug abuse Child welfare Financial statements Federal court decisions Family law Evidence Trials Children & youth
topic	ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk PU 5000: bkl 86.22 misc Enforcement misc Divorce misc Contempt of court misc Parental rights misc Jurisdiction misc State court decisions misc Parents & parenting misc Families & family life misc Drug abuse misc Child welfare misc Financial statements misc Federal court decisions misc Family law misc Evidence misc Trials misc Children & youth
spellingShingle	ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk PU 5000: bkl 86.22 misc Enforcement misc Divorce misc Contempt of court misc Parental rights misc Jurisdiction misc State court decisions misc Parents & parenting misc Families & family life misc Drug abuse misc Child welfare misc Financial statements misc Federal court decisions misc Family law misc Evidence misc Trials misc Children & youth Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
topic_unstemmed	ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk PU 5000: bkl 86.22 misc Enforcement misc Divorce misc Contempt of court misc Parental rights misc Jurisdiction misc State court decisions misc Parents & parenting misc Families & family life misc Drug abuse misc Child welfare misc Financial statements misc Federal court decisions misc Family law misc Evidence misc Trials misc Children & youth
topic_browse	ddc 340 fid INTRECHT rvk PU 5000: bkl 86.22 misc Enforcement misc Divorce misc Contempt of court misc Parental rights misc Jurisdiction misc State court decisions misc Parents & parenting misc Families & family life misc Drug abuse misc Child welfare misc Financial statements misc Federal court decisions misc Family law misc Evidence misc Trials misc Children & youth
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Family law quarterly
hierarchy_parent_id	168185032
dewey-tens	340 - Law
hierarchy_top_title	Family law quarterly
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)168185032 (DE-600)700179-4 (DE-576)015931773
title	Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1973880695 (DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695 (PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270 (KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests
title_full	Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
journal	Family law quarterly
journalStr	Family law quarterly
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	617
container_volume	49
class	340 ZDB INTRECHT fid PU 5000: AVZ rvk 86.22 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
dewey-full	340
title_sort	family law in the fifty states 2014-2015: case digests
title_auth	Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
abstract	Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.
abstractGer	Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.
abstract_unstemmed	Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4305
container_issue	4
title_short	Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests
url	http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	168185032
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-04T03:19:34.400Z
_version_	1803616963170140160
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1973880695</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215090257.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160430s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1973880695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1973880695</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)proquest_journals_17822010270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0082835120160000049000400617familylawinthefiftystates20142015casedigests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 5000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.22</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mother demonstrated a lack of willingness to participate in any of the many treatment programs offered by the state, which had provided remedial and rehabilitative programs to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. State court had concurrent jurisdiction with Indian tribes over termination of parental rights proceeding. The trial court erred in placing an Indian child in foster care without an explicit determination that mother's continued custody would result in the children's emotional or physical damage, which is supported by testimony of a qualified expert witness. Neither claim nor issue preclusion bars a husband's tort suit against his wife for abuse of process, defamation, and emotional distress after the divorce became final. Trial court did not err in not considering evidence of husband's extramarital affairs in a wrongful death suit against a doctor and hospital, because the evidence was not relevant in determining the damages in this case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Enforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divorce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contempt of court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parental rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">State court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parents & parenting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Families & family life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drug abuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Child welfare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Financial statements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Federal court decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Children & youth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Family law quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">Chicago, Ill. : Sect., 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">49(2016), 4, Seite 617</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168185032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)700179-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015931773</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-729X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:49</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1782201027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">PU 5000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.22</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">49</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">617</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400505

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Family Law in the Fifty States 2014-2015: Case Digests

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?