Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective
Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Terjesen, Siri [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly - West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991, 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; pages:23 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1974166074 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1974166074 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714185656.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160430s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/beq.2016.7 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160430 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1974166074 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Terjesen, Siri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Affirmative action | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sealy, Ruth |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Business ethics quarterly |d West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 |g 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 |w (DE-627)170589528 |w (DE-600)1078295-3 |w (DE-576)10076374X |x 1052-150X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:23 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 23 | ||
| author_variant |
s t st |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1052150X:2016----::orgneqoaepoigtiatninfoautte |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Terjesen, Siri verfasserin aut Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics Affirmative action Sealy, Ruth oth Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 (DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X 1052-150X nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 26 2016 1 23 |
| spelling |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Terjesen, Siri verfasserin aut Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics Affirmative action Sealy, Ruth oth Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 (DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X 1052-150X nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 26 2016 1 23 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Terjesen, Siri verfasserin aut Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics Affirmative action Sealy, Ruth oth Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 (DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X 1052-150X nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 26 2016 1 23 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Terjesen, Siri verfasserin aut Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics Affirmative action Sealy, Ruth oth Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 (DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X 1052-150X nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 26 2016 1 23 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 doi PQ20160430 (DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Terjesen, Siri verfasserin aut Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics Affirmative action Sealy, Ruth oth Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 (DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X 1052-150X nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 26 2016 1 23 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Business ethics quarterly 26(2016), 1, Seite 23 volume:26 year:2016 number:1 pages:23 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Affirmative action |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Business ethics quarterly |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Terjesen, Siri @@aut@@ Sealy, Ruth @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
170589528 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC1974166074 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1974166074</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714185656.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160430s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/beq.2016.7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1974166074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Terjesen, Siri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Affirmative action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sealy, Ruth</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Business ethics quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2016), 1, Seite 23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170589528</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1078295-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)10076374X</subfield><subfield code="x">1052-150X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Terjesen, Siri |
| spellingShingle |
Terjesen, Siri ddc 330 misc Affirmative action Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| authorStr |
Terjesen, Siri |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170589528 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1052-150X |
| topic_title |
330 DNB Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective Affirmative action |
| topic |
ddc 330 misc Affirmative action |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Affirmative action |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Affirmative action |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
r s rs |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Business ethics quarterly |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
170589528 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Business ethics quarterly |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170589528 (DE-600)1078295-3 (DE-576)10076374X |
| title |
Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1974166074 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074 (PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060 (KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult |
| title_full |
Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| author_sort |
Terjesen, Siri |
| journal |
Business ethics quarterly |
| journalStr |
Business ethics quarterly |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
23 |
| author_browse |
Terjesen, Siri |
| container_volume |
26 |
| class |
330 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Terjesen, Siri |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| title_auth |
Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| abstract |
Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. |
| abstractGer |
Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Sealy, Ruth |
| author2Str |
Sealy, Ruth |
| ppnlink |
170589528 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1017/beq.2016.7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:54:25.373Z |
| _version_ |
1803619155712147456 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1974166074</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714185656.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160430s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/beq.2016.7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1974166074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1974166074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)gale_infotrac_4483388060</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0205844820160000026000100023boardgenderquotasexploringethicaltensionsfromamult</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Terjesen, Siri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 Society of Business Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Affirmative action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sealy, Ruth</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Business ethics quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">West Nyack : Cambridge University Press, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2016), 1, Seite 23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170589528</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1078295-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)10076374X</subfield><subfield code="x">1052-150X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400672 |