Debating Darwin at the Cape
This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Nob...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Livingstone, David N [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Systematik: |
|
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of historical geography - Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975, 52(2016), Seite 1-15 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:52 ; year:2016 ; pages:1-15 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1974541274 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1974541274 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220217070233.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160610 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1974541274 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 910 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a RA |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 15.10 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 74.07 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Livingstone, David N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ideology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Colonies & territories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anthropology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evolution | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of historical geography |d Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 |g 52(2016), Seite 1-15 |w (DE-627)12941204X |w (DE-600)188688-5 |w (DE-576)014791609 |x 0305-7488 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2016 |g pages:1-15 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HIS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-ANG | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2315 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a RA |
| 936 | b | k | |a 15.10 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 74.07 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 52 |j 2016 |h 1-15 | ||
| author_variant |
d n l dn dnl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:03057488:2016----::eaigawn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
15.10 74.07 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Livingstone, David N verfasserin aut Debating Darwin at the Cape 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution Enthalten in Journal of historical geography Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 52(2016), Seite 1-15 (DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 0305-7488 nnns volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 RA 15.10 AVZ 74.07 AVZ AR 52 2016 1-15 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Livingstone, David N verfasserin aut Debating Darwin at the Cape 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution Enthalten in Journal of historical geography Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 52(2016), Seite 1-15 (DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 0305-7488 nnns volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 RA 15.10 AVZ 74.07 AVZ AR 52 2016 1-15 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Livingstone, David N verfasserin aut Debating Darwin at the Cape 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution Enthalten in Journal of historical geography Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 52(2016), Seite 1-15 (DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 0305-7488 nnns volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 RA 15.10 AVZ 74.07 AVZ AR 52 2016 1-15 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Livingstone, David N verfasserin aut Debating Darwin at the Cape 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution Enthalten in Journal of historical geography Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 52(2016), Seite 1-15 (DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 0305-7488 nnns volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 RA 15.10 AVZ 74.07 AVZ AR 52 2016 1-15 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Livingstone, David N verfasserin aut Debating Darwin at the Cape 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution Enthalten in Journal of historical geography Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975 52(2016), Seite 1-15 (DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 0305-7488 nnns volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 RA 15.10 AVZ 74.07 AVZ AR 52 2016 1-15 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of historical geography 52(2016), Seite 1-15 volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of historical geography 52(2016), Seite 1-15 volume:52 year:2016 pages:1-15 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution |
| dewey-raw |
910 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of historical geography |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Livingstone, David N @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
12941204X |
| dewey-sort |
3910 |
| id |
OLC1974541274 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1974541274</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217070233.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1974541274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RA</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livingstone, David N</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Debating Darwin at the Cape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ideology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Colonies & territories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anthropology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of historical geography</subfield><subfield code="d">Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">52(2016), Seite 1-15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12941204X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)188688-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014791609</subfield><subfield code="x">0305-7488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:52</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">RA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">15.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.07</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">52</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">1-15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Livingstone, David N |
| spellingShingle |
Livingstone, David N ddc 910 rvk RA bkl 15.10 bkl 74.07 misc Ideology misc Colonies & territories misc Anthropology misc Evolution Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| authorStr |
Livingstone, David N |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)12941204X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
910 - Geography & travel |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0305-7488 |
| topic_title |
910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl Debating Darwin at the Cape Ideology Colonies & territories Anthropology Evolution |
| topic |
ddc 910 rvk RA bkl 15.10 bkl 74.07 misc Ideology misc Colonies & territories misc Anthropology misc Evolution |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 910 rvk RA bkl 15.10 bkl 74.07 misc Ideology misc Colonies & territories misc Anthropology misc Evolution |
| topic_browse |
ddc 910 rvk RA bkl 15.10 bkl 74.07 misc Ideology misc Colonies & territories misc Anthropology misc Evolution |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of historical geography |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
12941204X |
| dewey-tens |
910 - Geography & travel |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of historical geography |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)12941204X (DE-600)188688-5 (DE-576)014791609 |
| title |
Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1974541274 (DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274 (PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0 (KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape |
| title_full |
Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| author_sort |
Livingstone, David N |
| journal |
Journal of historical geography |
| journalStr |
Journal of historical geography |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
900 - History & geography |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Livingstone, David N |
| container_volume |
52 |
| class |
910 DNB RA AVZ rvk 15.10 bkl 74.07 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Livingstone, David N |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 |
| dewey-full |
910 |
| title_sort |
debating darwin at the cape |
| title_auth |
Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| abstract |
This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. |
| abstractGer |
This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2315 GBV_ILN_4311 |
| title_short |
Debating Darwin at the Cape |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
12941204X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:32:04.038Z |
| _version_ |
1803621524081475584 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1974541274</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217070233.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1974541274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1974541274</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1560-2e4e68fe550cfba059e302cd888ebb54dacda4f1ff4cc921b78c5a3f13823d9b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0007353920160000052000000001debatingdarwinatthecape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RA</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Livingstone, David N</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Debating Darwin at the Cape</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper focuses attention on the fortunes of Darwin's theory among the English-speaking community in Cape Colony during the latter part of the nineteenth century. The paper begins with a review of early encounters with Darwin dwelling particularly on the response of figures like Roderick Noble -- professor and editor of the Cape Monthly Magazine, the geologist John Shaw, and Sir Henry Barkly, governor of the colony. Besides these more theoretical responses, Darwin's ideas were also mobilised in a range of scientific inquiries on such subjects as birds and butterflies. But most conspicuous was the use of evolutionary thought-forms in the work of the eminent philologist Wilhelm Bleek, cousin of Darwin's leading German apologist, Ernst Haeckel. The prevailing sense is of a liberal intelligentsia calmly interacting with a novel theory with all due deference. During the 1870s, an address by Langham Dale at the South African Public Library injected new energy into the Darwin discussion. Dale expressed disquiet over some of the anthropological implications of evolution as well as its apparent reductionism, and this stimulated a range of reactions. Several anonymous commentators responded but the most sustained evaluation of Dale's position emanated from the Queenstown physician and later politician, Sir William Bisset Berry. Then, in 1874, copious extracts from John Tyndall's infamous 'Belfast Address' were printed in the Cape Monthly and this added yet further impetus to the debate. Tyndall's seeming materialism bothered a number of readers, not least Hon William Porter, former attorney-general of Cape Colony. To figures like these the materialist extrapolations of radical Darwinians such as Haeckel were deeply disturbing, not just for religious reasons, but because they seemed to destabilise the moral and pedagogic progressivism that lay at the heart of their civilising credo. While reservations about Darwin's proposals were certainly audible, taken in the round Darwinian conversations among the English-speaking literati at the Cape were conducted with liberal sentiments, not least when evolutionary science approached questions of race. For Darwin's writings were seen to confirm a monogenetic account of the origin and unity of the human race, and could readily be called upon to justify the paternalistic ideology that governed colonial affairs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Elsevier Ltd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ideology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Colonies & territories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anthropology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of historical geography</subfield><subfield code="d">Orlando, Fla [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">52(2016), Seite 1-15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12941204X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)188688-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014791609</subfield><subfield code="x">0305-7488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:52</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.12.002</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030574881500198X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1789773754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">RA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">15.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">74.07</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">52</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">1-15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4009247 |