Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus
Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effect...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sang, Wen [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Pest management science - Chichester : Wiley, 2000, 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:72 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; pages:787-795 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1002/ps.4053 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC197464247X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC197464247X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220219212651.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/ps.4053 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160610 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC197464247X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 580 |a 630 |a 640 |a 660 |q DNB |
084 | |a 48.54 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sang, Wen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry | ||
540 | |a © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. | ||
650 | 4 | |a reproductive system | |
650 | 4 | |a Callosobruchus maculatus | |
650 | 4 | |a emergence | |
650 | 4 | |a irradiation | |
650 | 4 | |a longevity | |
650 | 4 | |a electron beam | |
650 | 4 | |a Radiation | |
650 | 4 | |a Pest control | |
650 | 4 | |a Insecticides | |
700 | 1 | |a Speakmon, Mickey |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Lan |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yu |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lei, Chaoliang |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pillai, Suresh D |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pest management science |d Chichester : Wiley, 2000 |g 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 |w (DE-627)309622565 |w (DE-600)2001705-4 |w (DE-576)084508841 |x 1526-498X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:787-795 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 48.54 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 72 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 787-795 |
author_variant |
w s ws |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1526498X:2016----::ermnaefcsflcrnemraitooteoparcic |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
bklnumber |
48.54 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1002/ps.4053 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Sang, Wen verfasserin aut Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides Speakmon, Mickey oth Zhou, Lan oth Wang, Yu oth Lei, Chaoliang oth Pillai, Suresh D oth Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan oth Enthalten in Pest management science Chichester : Wiley, 2000 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 (DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 1526-498X nnns volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 48.54 AVZ AR 72 2016 4 787-795 |
spelling |
10.1002/ps.4053 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Sang, Wen verfasserin aut Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides Speakmon, Mickey oth Zhou, Lan oth Wang, Yu oth Lei, Chaoliang oth Pillai, Suresh D oth Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan oth Enthalten in Pest management science Chichester : Wiley, 2000 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 (DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 1526-498X nnns volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 48.54 AVZ AR 72 2016 4 787-795 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1002/ps.4053 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Sang, Wen verfasserin aut Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides Speakmon, Mickey oth Zhou, Lan oth Wang, Yu oth Lei, Chaoliang oth Pillai, Suresh D oth Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan oth Enthalten in Pest management science Chichester : Wiley, 2000 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 (DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 1526-498X nnns volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 48.54 AVZ AR 72 2016 4 787-795 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1002/ps.4053 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Sang, Wen verfasserin aut Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides Speakmon, Mickey oth Zhou, Lan oth Wang, Yu oth Lei, Chaoliang oth Pillai, Suresh D oth Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan oth Enthalten in Pest management science Chichester : Wiley, 2000 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 (DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 1526-498X nnns volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 48.54 AVZ AR 72 2016 4 787-795 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1002/ps.4053 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Sang, Wen verfasserin aut Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides Speakmon, Mickey oth Zhou, Lan oth Wang, Yu oth Lei, Chaoliang oth Pillai, Suresh D oth Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan oth Enthalten in Pest management science Chichester : Wiley, 2000 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 (DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 1526-498X nnns volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 48.54 AVZ AR 72 2016 4 787-795 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Pest management science 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Pest management science 72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795 volume:72 year:2016 number:4 pages:787-795 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Pest management science |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sang, Wen @@aut@@ Speakmon, Mickey @@oth@@ Zhou, Lan @@oth@@ Wang, Yu @@oth@@ Lei, Chaoliang @@oth@@ Pillai, Suresh D @@oth@@ Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
309622565 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC197464247X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC197464247X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219212651.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/ps.4053</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC197464247X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">580</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.54</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sang, Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reproductive system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Callosobruchus maculatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">irradiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">longevity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">electron beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pest control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Insecticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Speakmon, Mickey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Lan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lei, Chaoliang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pillai, Suresh D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pest management science</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester : Wiley, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)309622565</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2001705-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)084508841</subfield><subfield code="x">1526-498X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:72</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:787-795</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.54</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">72</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">787-795</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sang, Wen |
spellingShingle |
Sang, Wen ddc 570 bkl 48.54 misc reproductive system misc Callosobruchus maculatus misc emergence misc irradiation misc longevity misc electron beam misc Radiation misc Pest control misc Insecticides Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
authorStr |
Sang, Wen |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)309622565 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 580 - Plants (Botany) 630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 660 - Chemical engineering |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1526-498X |
topic_title |
570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus reproductive system Callosobruchus maculatus emergence irradiation longevity electron beam Radiation Pest control Insecticides |
topic |
ddc 570 bkl 48.54 misc reproductive system misc Callosobruchus maculatus misc emergence misc irradiation misc longevity misc electron beam misc Radiation misc Pest control misc Insecticides |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 bkl 48.54 misc reproductive system misc Callosobruchus maculatus misc emergence misc irradiation misc longevity misc electron beam misc Radiation misc Pest control misc Insecticides |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 bkl 48.54 misc reproductive system misc Callosobruchus maculatus misc emergence misc irradiation misc longevity misc electron beam misc Radiation misc Pest control misc Insecticides |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
m s ms l z lz y w yw c l cl s d p sd sdp k z kz |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Pest management science |
hierarchy_parent_id |
309622565 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 580 - Plants (Botany) 630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 660 - Chemical engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Pest management science |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)309622565 (DE-600)2001705-4 (DE-576)084508841 |
title |
Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC197464247X (DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X (PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83 (KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco |
title_full |
Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
author_sort |
Sang, Wen |
journal |
Pest management science |
journalStr |
Pest management science |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
787 |
author_browse |
Sang, Wen |
container_volume |
72 |
class |
570 580 630 640 660 DNB 48.54 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sang, Wen |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/ps.4053 |
dewey-full |
570 580 630 640 660 |
title_sort |
detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid callosobruchus maculatus |
title_auth |
Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
abstract |
Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. |
abstractGer |
Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-FOR GBV_ILN_4219 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Speakmon, Mickey Zhou, Lan Wang, Yu Lei, Chaoliang Pillai, Suresh D Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan |
author2Str |
Speakmon, Mickey Zhou, Lan Wang, Yu Lei, Chaoliang Pillai, Suresh D Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan |
ppnlink |
309622565 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1002/ps.4053 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:46:09.907Z |
_version_ |
1803622411035213824 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC197464247X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219212651.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/ps.4053</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC197464247X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC197464247X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1763-1aad0772bed28dfd997442159f868a475141cfc53c658d13a3847f4d917a2db83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0016093820160000072000400787detrimentaleffectsofelectronbeamirradiationontheco</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">580</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.54</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sang, Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detrimental effects of electron beam irradiation on the cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electron beam (eBeam) irradiation technology is an environmentally friendly, chemical-free alternative for disinfesting insect pests of stored grains. The underlying hypothesis is that specific doses of eBeam will have defined detrimental effects on the different life stages. We evaluated the effects of eBeam exposure in a range of doses (0.03-0.12 kGy) on the development of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) at various stages of its life cycle. Differential radiosensitivity was detected during egg development. Early and intermediate stages of eggs never hatched after exposure to a dose of 0.03 kGy, whereas a substantial portion of black-headed (i.e. late) eggs survived irradiation even at 0.12 kGy. However, further development of the hatched larvae was inhibited. Although midgut protein digestion remained intact, irradiated larvae (0.06 kGy or higher) failed to develop into normal living adults; rather, they died as pupae or abnormally eclosed adults, suggesting a detrimental effect of eBeam on metamorphosis. Emerged irradiated pupae had shorter longevity and were unable to produce any eggs at 0.06 kGy or higher. At this dose range, eggs laid by irradiated adults were not viable. eBeam treatment shortened adult longevity in a dose-dependent manner. Reciprocal crosses indicated that females were more sensitive to eBeam exposure than their male counterparts. Dissection of the female reproductive system revealed that eBeam treatment prevented formation of oocytes. eBeam irradiation has very defined effects on cowpea bruchid development and reproduction. A dose of 0.06 kGy could successfully impede cowpea burchid population expansion. This information can be exploited for post-harvest insect control of stored grains. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reproductive system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Callosobruchus maculatus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">irradiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">longevity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">electron beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pest control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Insecticides</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Speakmon, Mickey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Lan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lei, Chaoliang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pillai, Suresh D</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu‐Salzman, Keyan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pest management science</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester : Wiley, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">72(2016), 4, Seite 787-795</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)309622565</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2001705-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)084508841</subfield><subfield code="x">1526-498X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:72</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:787-795</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4053</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.4053/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1768865855</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.54</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">72</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">787-795</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4012585 |