Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions
The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ammer, Stefanie [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The journal of dairy research - London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929, 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:83 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:165 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1975044789 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1975044789 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220216101544.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160610 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1975044789 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q ZDB |
| 084 | |a 58.34 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 83.60 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 83.67 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ammer, Stefanie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Lambertz, Christian |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gauly, Matthias |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of dairy research |d London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 |g 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 |w (DE-627)129605433 |w (DE-600)242089-2 |w (DE-576)015099679 |x 0022-0299 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:83 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:165 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 58.34 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 83.60 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 83.67 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 83 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 165 | ||
| author_variant |
s a sa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00220299:2016----::oprsnfifrnmauigehdfroyeprtrilcaigosne |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
58.34 83.60 83.67 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Ammer, Stefanie verfasserin aut Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. Lambertz, Christian oth Gauly, Matthias oth Enthalten in The journal of dairy research London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 (DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 0022-0299 nnns volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 58.34 AVZ 83.60 AVZ 83.67 AVZ AR 83 2016 2 165 |
| spelling |
PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Ammer, Stefanie verfasserin aut Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. Lambertz, Christian oth Gauly, Matthias oth Enthalten in The journal of dairy research London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 (DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 0022-0299 nnns volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 58.34 AVZ 83.60 AVZ 83.67 AVZ AR 83 2016 2 165 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Ammer, Stefanie verfasserin aut Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. Lambertz, Christian oth Gauly, Matthias oth Enthalten in The journal of dairy research London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 (DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 0022-0299 nnns volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 58.34 AVZ 83.60 AVZ 83.67 AVZ AR 83 2016 2 165 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Ammer, Stefanie verfasserin aut Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. Lambertz, Christian oth Gauly, Matthias oth Enthalten in The journal of dairy research London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 (DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 0022-0299 nnns volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 58.34 AVZ 83.60 AVZ 83.67 AVZ AR 83 2016 2 165 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Ammer, Stefanie verfasserin aut Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. Lambertz, Christian oth Gauly, Matthias oth Enthalten in The journal of dairy research London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 (DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 0022-0299 nnns volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 58.34 AVZ 83.60 AVZ 83.67 AVZ AR 83 2016 2 165 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The journal of dairy research 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The journal of dairy research 83(2016), 2, Seite 165 volume:83 year:2016 number:2 pages:165 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
660 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of dairy research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ammer, Stefanie @@aut@@ Lambertz, Christian @@oth@@ Gauly, Matthias @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129605433 |
| dewey-sort |
3660 |
| id |
OLC1975044789 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1975044789</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216101544.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1975044789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.60</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.67</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ammer, Stefanie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lambertz, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gauly, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of dairy research</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2016), 2, Seite 165</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129605433</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)242089-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015099679</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-0299</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.60</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.67</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">165</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ammer, Stefanie |
| spellingShingle |
Ammer, Stefanie ddc 660 bkl 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| authorStr |
Ammer, Stefanie |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129605433 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0022-0299 |
| topic_title |
660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| topic |
ddc 660 bkl 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 bkl 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 660 bkl 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
c l cl m g mg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of dairy research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129605433 |
| dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of dairy research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129605433 (DE-600)242089-2 (DE-576)015099679 |
| title |
Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1975044789 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900 (KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper |
| title_full |
Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| author_sort |
Ammer, Stefanie |
| journal |
The journal of dairy research |
| journalStr |
The journal of dairy research |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
165 |
| author_browse |
Ammer, Stefanie |
| container_volume |
83 |
| class |
660 ZDB 58.34 bkl 83.60 bkl 83.67 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ammer, Stefanie |
| dewey-full |
660 |
| title_sort |
comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| title_auth |
Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| abstract |
The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. |
| abstractGer |
The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions |
| url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Lambertz, Christian Gauly, Matthias |
| author2Str |
Lambertz, Christian Gauly, Matthias |
| ppnlink |
129605433 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:39:18.521Z |
| _version_ |
1803625754539327488 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1975044789</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216101544.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1975044789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1975044789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)pubmed_primary_272104900</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0057102420160000083000200165comparisonofdifferentmeasuringmethodsforbodytemper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.60</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.67</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ammer, Stefanie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of different measuring methods for body temperature in lactating cows under different climatic conditions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of the research described here was to compare different methods of body temperature (BT) measurements in dairy cows. It was hypothesised that reticular temperature (RET) values reflect the physiological status of the animals in an equivalent way to rectal (RT) and vaginal (VT) measurements. RT, VT and RET temperatures of twelve lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were measured over five consecutive days in June and October 2013. While RT and VT were manually measured three times a day, RET was automatically recorded at 10 min intervals using a bolus in the reticulum. For comparison with RT and VT, different RET values were used: single values at the respective recording times (RET-SIN), and mean (RET-MEAN) and median (RET-MED) values of 2 h prior to RT and VT measurements. Overall, body temperatures averaged 38·1 ± 0·6, 38·2 ± 0·4, 38·7 ± 0·9, 38·5 ± 0·7 and 38·7 ± 0·5 °C for RT, VT, RET-SIN, RET-MEAN and RET-MED, respectively. RT and VT were lower than all RET measurements, while RET-SIN and RET-MED were higher than RET-MEAN (P < 0·001). RET-MEAN and RET-MED values were higher in the morning, whereas RT and VT were greatest in the evening (P < 0·001). Overall, records of RT and VT were strongly correlated (r = 0·75; P < 0·001). In contrast to RET-SIN and RET-MEAN, RET-MED was higher correlated to RT and VT. In June, coefficients were higher between all methods than in October. Relation of barn T to RT and VT was stronger when compared to RET measurements. RET-SIN was higher correlated to barn T than RET-MEAN or RET-MED. Correlation between VT and barn T was strongest (r = 0·48; P < 0·001). In summary, RET-MED showed highest correlation with VT and RT. However, single RET measurements (influenced by water or feed intake) can lead to extreme variations and differences to single VT and RT values.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lambertz, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gauly, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of dairy research</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1929</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2016), 2, Seite 165</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129605433</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)242089-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015099679</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-0299</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210490</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.34</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.60</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.67</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">165</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398793 |