Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects
This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Stosic, Biljana [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Innovation - Abingdon : Routledge, 1988, 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:177 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1975928261 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1975928261 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214191528.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160610 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1975928261 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |a 330 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 70.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stosic, Biljana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prioritization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a recycling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a AHP | |
| 650 | 4 | |a eco-innovation projects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a innovation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Organizational learning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agglomeration | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Milutinovic, Radul |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zakic, Nebojsa |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zivkovic, Nedeljko |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Innovation |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 |g 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 |w (DE-627)170856712 |w (DE-600)1117168-6 |w (DE-576)385406398 |x 1351-1610 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:177 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 70.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 29 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 177 | ||
| author_variant |
b s bs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13511610:2016----::eetdniaosoeautooeon |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
70.00 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Stosic, Biljana verfasserin aut Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration Milutinovic, Radul oth Zakic, Nebojsa oth Zivkovic, Nedeljko oth Enthalten in Innovation Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 (DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 1351-1610 nnns volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 70.00 AVZ AR 29 2016 2 177 |
| spelling |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Stosic, Biljana verfasserin aut Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration Milutinovic, Radul oth Zakic, Nebojsa oth Zivkovic, Nedeljko oth Enthalten in Innovation Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 (DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 1351-1610 nnns volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 70.00 AVZ AR 29 2016 2 177 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Stosic, Biljana verfasserin aut Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration Milutinovic, Radul oth Zakic, Nebojsa oth Zivkovic, Nedeljko oth Enthalten in Innovation Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 (DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 1351-1610 nnns volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 70.00 AVZ AR 29 2016 2 177 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Stosic, Biljana verfasserin aut Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration Milutinovic, Radul oth Zakic, Nebojsa oth Zivkovic, Nedeljko oth Enthalten in Innovation Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 (DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 1351-1610 nnns volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 70.00 AVZ AR 29 2016 2 177 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 doi PQ20160610 (DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Stosic, Biljana verfasserin aut Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016 model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration Milutinovic, Radul oth Zakic, Nebojsa oth Zivkovic, Nedeljko oth Enthalten in Innovation Abingdon : Routledge, 1988 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 (DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 1351-1610 nnns volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 70.00 AVZ AR 29 2016 2 177 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Innovation 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Innovation 29(2016), 2, Seite 177 volume:29 year:2016 number:2 pages:177 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Innovation |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Stosic, Biljana @@aut@@ Milutinovic, Radul @@oth@@ Zakic, Nebojsa @@oth@@ Zivkovic, Nedeljko @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
170856712 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC1975928261 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1975928261</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214191528.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1975928261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stosic, Biljana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prioritization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">recycling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">AHP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eco-innovation projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">innovation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organizational learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agglomeration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Milutinovic, Radul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zakic, Nebojsa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zivkovic, Nedeljko</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Innovation</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2016), 2, Seite 177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170856712</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1117168-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)385406398</subfield><subfield code="x">1351-1610</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Stosic, Biljana |
| spellingShingle |
Stosic, Biljana ddc 300 bkl 70.00 misc model misc prioritization misc recycling misc AHP misc eco-innovation projects misc innovation misc Organizational learning misc Agglomeration Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| authorStr |
Stosic, Biljana |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170856712 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences 330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1351-1610 |
| topic_title |
300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects model prioritization recycling AHP eco-innovation projects innovation Organizational learning Agglomeration |
| topic |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 misc model misc prioritization misc recycling misc AHP misc eco-innovation projects misc innovation misc Organizational learning misc Agglomeration |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 misc model misc prioritization misc recycling misc AHP misc eco-innovation projects misc innovation misc Organizational learning misc Agglomeration |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 bkl 70.00 misc model misc prioritization misc recycling misc AHP misc eco-innovation projects misc innovation misc Organizational learning misc Agglomeration |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
r m rm n z nz n z nz |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Innovation |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
170856712 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Innovation |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170856712 (DE-600)1117168-6 (DE-576)385406398 |
| title |
Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1975928261 (DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261 (PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600 (KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj |
| title_full |
Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| author_sort |
Stosic, Biljana |
| journal |
Innovation |
| journalStr |
Innovation |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
177 |
| author_browse |
Stosic, Biljana |
| container_volume |
29 |
| class |
300 330 DNB 70.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Stosic, Biljana |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |
| dewey-full |
300 330 |
| title_sort |
selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| title_auth |
Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| abstract |
This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. |
| abstractGer |
This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Milutinovic, Radul Zakic, Nebojsa Zivkovic, Nedeljko |
| author2Str |
Milutinovic, Radul Zakic, Nebojsa Zivkovic, Nedeljko |
| ppnlink |
170856712 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:05:19.576Z |
| _version_ |
1803566993459118080 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1975928261</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214191528.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160609s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1975928261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1975928261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1373-16afcef0e6ed420be52c4ef64a33ffcab839af895d7405f8b4e29b9ceeb3ea600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0215236320160000029000200177selectedindicatorsforevaluationofecoinnovationproj</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stosic, Biljana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper addresses a particular innovation projects category, that is, eco-innovation, in line with the fact that a lot of research has been recently carried out in this area, due to increasing attention. Eco-innovation projects are related to development and introducing the new products, processes and services that reduce the overall negative impact on the environment, putting the business and innovation together to create sustainable solutions. The aim of our research is developing a model for prioritization of the most frequent eco-innovation projects in the recycling field. It should be one of the key challenges for national economies as it happens to be one of the current priorities and burning issues for the European Commission (Horizon 2020, CIP, COSME, etc.), giving the proposed model framework. The ranking has been established with regard to common national economy benefits defined through identified criteria, by applying the well-known analytic hierarchy process method of multi-criteria decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 ICCR Foundation 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prioritization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">recycling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">AHP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eco-innovation projects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">innovation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organizational learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agglomeration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Milutinovic, Radul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zakic, Nebojsa</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zivkovic, Nedeljko</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Innovation</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2016), 2, Seite 177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170856712</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1117168-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)385406398</subfield><subfield code="x">1351-1610</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1791889866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400361 |