Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients
To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ciammella, Patrizia [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Systematik: |
|
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The British journal of radiology - Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928, 89(2016), 1061 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:89 ; year:2016 ; number:1061 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1977187897 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1977187897 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230513071516.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160719 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1977187897 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DNB |
084 | |a XA 34700 |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 44.64 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 44.40 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ciammella, Patrizia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Filippi, Andrea Riccardo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Simontacchi, Gabriele |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Buglione, Michela |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Botto, Barbara |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Mangoni, Monica |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Iotti, Cinzia |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Merli, Francesco |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Marcheselli, Luigi |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bisi, Gianni |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ricardi, Umberto |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Versari, Annibale |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The British journal of radiology |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 |g 89(2016), 1061 |w (DE-627)129077976 |w (DE-600)2982-8 |w (DE-576)014410524 |x 0007-1285 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:89 |g year:2016 |g number:1061 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
936 | r | v | |a XA 34700 |
936 | b | k | |a 44.64 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 44.40 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 89 |j 2016 |e 1061 |
author_variant |
p c pc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00071285:2016----::otbdrrdohrp1fdptrvdsdiinlrgotcnomtofralsaeogilmhm |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
bklnumber |
44.64 44.40 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Ciammella, Patrizia verfasserin aut Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. Filippi, Andrea Riccardo oth Simontacchi, Gabriele oth Buglione, Michela oth Botto, Barbara oth Mangoni, Monica oth Iotti, Cinzia oth Merli, Francesco oth Marcheselli, Luigi oth Bisi, Gianni oth Ricardi, Umberto oth Versari, Annibale oth Enthalten in The British journal of radiology Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 89(2016), 1061 (DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 0007-1285 nnns volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 XA 34700 44.64 AVZ 44.40 AVZ AR 89 2016 1061 |
spelling |
PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Ciammella, Patrizia verfasserin aut Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. Filippi, Andrea Riccardo oth Simontacchi, Gabriele oth Buglione, Michela oth Botto, Barbara oth Mangoni, Monica oth Iotti, Cinzia oth Merli, Francesco oth Marcheselli, Luigi oth Bisi, Gianni oth Ricardi, Umberto oth Versari, Annibale oth Enthalten in The British journal of radiology Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 89(2016), 1061 (DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 0007-1285 nnns volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 XA 34700 44.64 AVZ 44.40 AVZ AR 89 2016 1061 |
allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Ciammella, Patrizia verfasserin aut Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. Filippi, Andrea Riccardo oth Simontacchi, Gabriele oth Buglione, Michela oth Botto, Barbara oth Mangoni, Monica oth Iotti, Cinzia oth Merli, Francesco oth Marcheselli, Luigi oth Bisi, Gianni oth Ricardi, Umberto oth Versari, Annibale oth Enthalten in The British journal of radiology Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 89(2016), 1061 (DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 0007-1285 nnns volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 XA 34700 44.64 AVZ 44.40 AVZ AR 89 2016 1061 |
allfieldsGer |
PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Ciammella, Patrizia verfasserin aut Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. Filippi, Andrea Riccardo oth Simontacchi, Gabriele oth Buglione, Michela oth Botto, Barbara oth Mangoni, Monica oth Iotti, Cinzia oth Merli, Francesco oth Marcheselli, Luigi oth Bisi, Gianni oth Ricardi, Umberto oth Versari, Annibale oth Enthalten in The British journal of radiology Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 89(2016), 1061 (DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 0007-1285 nnns volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 XA 34700 44.64 AVZ 44.40 AVZ AR 89 2016 1061 |
allfieldsSound |
PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Ciammella, Patrizia verfasserin aut Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. Filippi, Andrea Riccardo oth Simontacchi, Gabriele oth Buglione, Michela oth Botto, Barbara oth Mangoni, Monica oth Iotti, Cinzia oth Merli, Francesco oth Marcheselli, Luigi oth Bisi, Gianni oth Ricardi, Umberto oth Versari, Annibale oth Enthalten in The British journal of radiology Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928 89(2016), 1061 (DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 0007-1285 nnns volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 XA 34700 44.64 AVZ 44.40 AVZ AR 89 2016 1061 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in The British journal of radiology 89(2016), 1061 volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in The British journal of radiology 89(2016), 1061 volume:89 year:2016 number:1061 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
The British journal of radiology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ciammella, Patrizia @@aut@@ Filippi, Andrea Riccardo @@oth@@ Simontacchi, Gabriele @@oth@@ Buglione, Michela @@oth@@ Botto, Barbara @@oth@@ Mangoni, Monica @@oth@@ Iotti, Cinzia @@oth@@ Merli, Francesco @@oth@@ Marcheselli, Luigi @@oth@@ Bisi, Gianni @@oth@@ Ricardi, Umberto @@oth@@ Versari, Annibale @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129077976 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
OLC1977187897 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1977187897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230513071516.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1977187897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XA 34700</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciammella, Patrizia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Filippi, Andrea Riccardo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simontacchi, Gabriele</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buglione, Michela</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Botto, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mangoni, Monica</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iotti, Cinzia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Merli, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcheselli, Luigi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bisi, Gianni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ricardi, Umberto</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Versari, Annibale</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The British journal of radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928</subfield><subfield code="g">89(2016), 1061</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129077976</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2982-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014410524</subfield><subfield code="x">0007-1285</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:89</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">XA 34700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">89</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1061</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ciammella, Patrizia |
spellingShingle |
Ciammella, Patrizia ddc 610 rvk XA 34700 bkl 44.64 bkl 44.40 Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
authorStr |
Ciammella, Patrizia |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129077976 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0007-1285 |
topic_title |
610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
topic |
ddc 610 rvk XA 34700 bkl 44.64 bkl 44.40 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 rvk XA 34700 bkl 44.64 bkl 44.40 |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 rvk XA 34700 bkl 44.64 bkl 44.40 |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
a r f ar arf g s gs m b mb b b bb m m mm c i ci f m fm l m lm g b gb u r ur a v av |
hierarchy_parent_title |
The British journal of radiology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129077976 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
The British journal of radiology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129077976 (DE-600)2982-8 (DE-576)014410524 |
title |
Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1977187897 (DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897 (PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770 (KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional |
title_full |
Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
author_sort |
Ciammella, Patrizia |
journal |
The British journal of radiology |
journalStr |
The British journal of radiology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Ciammella, Patrizia |
container_volume |
89 |
class |
610 DNB XA 34700 AVZ rvk 44.64 bkl 44.40 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ciammella, Patrizia |
dewey-full |
610 |
title_sort |
post-abvd/pre-radiotherapy (18)f-fdg-pet provides additional prognostic information for early-stage hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
title_auth |
Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
abstract |
To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. |
abstractGer |
To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. |
abstract_unstemmed |
To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 |
container_issue |
1061 |
title_short |
Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients |
url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo Simontacchi, Gabriele Buglione, Michela Botto, Barbara Mangoni, Monica Iotti, Cinzia Merli, Francesco Marcheselli, Luigi Bisi, Gianni Ricardi, Umberto Versari, Annibale |
author2Str |
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo Simontacchi, Gabriele Buglione, Michela Botto, Barbara Mangoni, Monica Iotti, Cinzia Merli, Francesco Marcheselli, Luigi Bisi, Gianni Ricardi, Umberto Versari, Annibale |
ppnlink |
129077976 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:34:58.117Z |
_version_ |
1803580183012179968 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1977187897</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230513071516.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1977187897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1977187897</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)pubmed_primary_270227770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026188220160000089106100000postabvdpreradiotherapy18ffdgpetprovidesadditional</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XA 34700</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciammella, Patrizia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Post-ABVD/pre-radiotherapy (18)F-FDG-PET provides additional prognostic information for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis on 165 patients</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To evaluate the prognostic role of both interim fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (i-(18)F-FDG-PET) and end-of-chemotherapy fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET) in patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We screened 257 patients with early-stage HL treated with combined modality therapy between March 2003 and July 2011. All were staged using fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) before chemotherapy and after two doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine cycles (i-(18)F-FDG-PET); 165 patients were also evaluated by (18)F-FDG-PET at the end of chemotherapy (eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET). After revision, 85% of patients were negative for i-(18)F-FDG-PET and 15% were positive. After eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET revision, 23 patients had a positive scan. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. For i-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and i-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 98% and 84%, respectively; for eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, the 5-year PFS rates were 97% and 78%, respectively. Combining the i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET results, the 5-year PFS were 97%, 100% and 82% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 98% and 83% in eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-negative and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET-positive patients, respectively; the 5-year OS was 98%, 100% and 83% in negative/negative, positive/negative and positive/positive groups, respectively. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. As data are accumulating and the clinical scenario is rapidly evolving, we might need to rethink the use of (18)F-FDG-PET as a prognostic marker for early-stage HL in the near future. This study provides additional information on the prognostic role of i-(18)F-FDG-PET and eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET in early-stage HL. On the basis of the present data, we may suggest to use eoc-(18)F-FDG-PET as a strong prognostic marker, especially for patients with i-(18)F-FDG-PET positivity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Filippi, Andrea Riccardo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simontacchi, Gabriele</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buglione, Michela</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Botto, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mangoni, Monica</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iotti, Cinzia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Merli, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcheselli, Luigi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bisi, Gianni</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ricardi, Umberto</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Versari, Annibale</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The British journal of radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1928</subfield><subfield code="g">89(2016), 1061</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129077976</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2982-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014410524</subfield><subfield code="x">0007-1285</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:89</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022777</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">XA 34700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.40</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">89</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1061</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.40176 |