Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches
Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconductin...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kim, Jin-Seok [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity - New York, NY : Inst., 1991, 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; pages:1-4 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1978292872 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1978292872 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714201209.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160719 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1978292872 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |a 620 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kim, Jin-Seok |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a protection coordination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Superconducting coils | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resistance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Type II superconductors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Windings | |
| 650 | 4 | |a over-current relay | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interrupters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fault currents | |
| 650 | 4 | |a current limiting resistance (CLR) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Computer simulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Case studies | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Jae-Chul |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lim, Sung-Hun |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |d New York, NY : Inst., 1991 |g 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 |w (DE-627)130969559 |w (DE-600)1070182-5 |w (DE-576)025189840 |x 1051-8223 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:1-4 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 1-4 | ||
| author_variant |
j s k jsk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10518223:2016----::tdopoetocodntooalxokyeuecnutnfutu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 doi PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 DNB Kim, Jin-Seok verfasserin aut Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies Kim, Jae-Chul oth Lim, Sung-Hun oth Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity New York, NY : Inst., 1991 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 (DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 1051-8223 nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 Volltext http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 26 2016 4 1-4 |
| spelling |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 doi PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 DNB Kim, Jin-Seok verfasserin aut Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies Kim, Jae-Chul oth Lim, Sung-Hun oth Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity New York, NY : Inst., 1991 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 (DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 1051-8223 nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 Volltext http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 26 2016 4 1-4 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 doi PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 DNB Kim, Jin-Seok verfasserin aut Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies Kim, Jae-Chul oth Lim, Sung-Hun oth Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity New York, NY : Inst., 1991 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 (DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 1051-8223 nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 Volltext http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 26 2016 4 1-4 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 doi PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 DNB Kim, Jin-Seok verfasserin aut Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies Kim, Jae-Chul oth Lim, Sung-Hun oth Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity New York, NY : Inst., 1991 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 (DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 1051-8223 nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 Volltext http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 26 2016 4 1-4 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 doi PQ20160719 (DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 DNB Kim, Jin-Seok verfasserin aut Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies Kim, Jae-Chul oth Lim, Sung-Hun oth Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity New York, NY : Inst., 1991 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 (DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 1051-8223 nnns volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 Volltext http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 26 2016 4 1-4 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4 volume:26 year:2016 number:4 pages:1-4 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kim, Jin-Seok @@aut@@ Kim, Jae-Chul @@oth@@ Lim, Sung-Hun @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130969559 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
OLC1978292872 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1978292872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714201209.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1978292872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jin-Seok</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">protection coordination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Superconducting coils</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Type II superconductors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Windings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">over-current relay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interrupters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fault currents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">current limiting resistance (CLR)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jae-Chul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lim, Sung-Hun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Inst., 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130969559</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1070182-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)025189840</subfield><subfield code="x">1051-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">1-4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kim, Jin-Seok |
| spellingShingle |
Kim, Jin-Seok ddc 530 misc protection coordination misc Superconducting coils misc Resistance misc flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) misc Type II superconductors misc Windings misc over-current relay misc Interrupters misc Fault currents misc current limiting resistance (CLR) misc Computer simulation misc Case studies Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| authorStr |
Kim, Jin-Seok |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130969559 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1051-8223 |
| topic_title |
530 620 DNB Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches protection coordination Superconducting coils Resistance flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) Type II superconductors Windings over-current relay Interrupters Fault currents current limiting resistance (CLR) Computer simulation Case studies |
| topic |
ddc 530 misc protection coordination misc Superconducting coils misc Resistance misc flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) misc Type II superconductors misc Windings misc over-current relay misc Interrupters misc Fault currents misc current limiting resistance (CLR) misc Computer simulation misc Case studies |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 misc protection coordination misc Superconducting coils misc Resistance misc flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) misc Type II superconductors misc Windings misc over-current relay misc Interrupters misc Fault currents misc current limiting resistance (CLR) misc Computer simulation misc Case studies |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 misc protection coordination misc Superconducting coils misc Resistance misc flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) misc Type II superconductors misc Windings misc over-current relay misc Interrupters misc Fault currents misc current limiting resistance (CLR) misc Computer simulation misc Case studies |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
j c k jck s h l shl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130969559 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130969559 (DE-600)1070182-5 (DE-576)025189840 |
| title |
Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1978292872 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872 (PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0 (KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc |
| title_full |
Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| author_sort |
Kim, Jin-Seok |
| journal |
IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| journalStr |
IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Kim, Jin-Seok |
| container_volume |
26 |
| class |
530 620 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kim, Jin-Seok |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 |
| dewey-full |
530 620 |
| title_sort |
study on protection coordination of a flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter using switches |
| title_auth |
Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| abstract |
Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. |
| abstractGer |
Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Kim, Jae-Chul Lim, Sung-Hun |
| author2Str |
Kim, Jae-Chul Lim, Sung-Hun |
| ppnlink |
130969559 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:14:56.647Z |
| _version_ |
1803594022676070400 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1978292872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714201209.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1978292872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1978292872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i821-e3c2289851a05d0a4b22d725cf7e0dfad8ff7f345b0aaa5cf3b012fe49764c5f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0203240620160000026000400001studyonprotectioncoordinationofafluxlocktypesuperc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jin-Seok</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Study on Protection Coordination of a Flux-Lock-Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter Using Switches</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Power systems have been continuously expanded to complex networks, due to the growth of power demand and additional installation of substation facilities, and the countermeasure to protect these power systems from the increased fault current is required. Among the various methods, the superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) has been noticed as the more effective protective device. The flux-lock-type SFCL, which is composed of two coils wound on the iron core and superconducting (SC) element, is known to be effective for reducing the burden of SC element, by adjusting either the inductance ratio or the winding direction between two coils. However, for the higher impedance of the SFCL, the higher resistance generation in the SC element comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL during the fault period is needed, which makes the power burden of the SC element more increased. Additionally, the long recovery time of the SFCL into the normal state after the fault removes affects the operation of the protective relay such as the overcurrent relay. In this paper, as the countermeasure for the protection coordination between the flux-lock-type SFCL and the overcurrent relay, the flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches was proposed. The proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using the switches, which can bypass the fault current through the operation of the switches into its current-limiting resistance (CLR) with the same amplitude as the SC resistance comprising the flux-lock-type SFCL, is expected to be operated to limit the fault current without the delayed recovery time. Through the case studies using computer simulation, the protection coordination of the proposed flux-lock-type SFCL using switches was validated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">protection coordination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Superconducting coils</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flux-lock-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Type II superconductors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Windings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">over-current relay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interrupters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fault currents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">current limiting resistance (CLR)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jae-Chul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lim, Sung-Hun</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Inst., 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2016), 4, Seite 1-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130969559</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1070182-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)025189840</subfield><subfield code="x">1051-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2549551</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7445856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">1-4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.39787 |