Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model
AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible mate...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Zhou, Hang [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of engineering mechanics - Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983, 142(2016), 7 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:142 ; year:2016 ; number:7 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1978749848 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1978749848 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220220143246.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160720 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1978749848 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 56.11 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 50.31 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhou, Hang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Technical Papers | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kong, Gangqiang |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Hanlong |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of engineering mechanics |d Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 |g 142(2016), 7 |w (DE-627)130750689 |w (DE-600)991019-0 |w (DE-576)016298284 |x 0733-9399 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:142 |g year:2016 |g number:7 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4266 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4319 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.11 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 50.31 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 142 |j 2016 |e 7 | ||
| author_variant |
h z hz |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:07339399:2016----::pebudouinofacvte |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
56.11 50.31 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Zhou, Hang verfasserin aut Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Kong, Gangqiang oth Liu, Hanlong oth Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 142(2016), 7 (DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 0733-9399 nnns volume:142 year:2016 number:7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 56.11 AVZ 50.31 AVZ AR 142 2016 7 |
| spelling |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Zhou, Hang verfasserin aut Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Kong, Gangqiang oth Liu, Hanlong oth Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 142(2016), 7 (DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 0733-9399 nnns volume:142 year:2016 number:7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 56.11 AVZ 50.31 AVZ AR 142 2016 7 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Zhou, Hang verfasserin aut Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Kong, Gangqiang oth Liu, Hanlong oth Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 142(2016), 7 (DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 0733-9399 nnns volume:142 year:2016 number:7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 56.11 AVZ 50.31 AVZ AR 142 2016 7 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Zhou, Hang verfasserin aut Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Kong, Gangqiang oth Liu, Hanlong oth Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 142(2016), 7 (DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 0733-9399 nnns volume:142 year:2016 number:7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 56.11 AVZ 50.31 AVZ AR 142 2016 7 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Zhou, Hang verfasserin aut Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Kong, Gangqiang oth Liu, Hanlong oth Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983 142(2016), 7 (DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 0733-9399 nnns volume:142 year:2016 number:7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 56.11 AVZ 50.31 AVZ AR 142 2016 7 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics 142(2016), 7 volume:142 year:2016 number:7 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of engineering mechanics 142(2016), 7 volume:142 year:2016 number:7 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Technical Papers |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of engineering mechanics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zhou, Hang @@aut@@ Kong, Gangqiang @@oth@@ Liu, Hanlong @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130750689 |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
OLC1978749848 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1978749848</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220220143246.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1978749848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Hang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technical Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Gangqiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Hanlong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of engineering mechanics</subfield><subfield code="d">Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">142(2016), 7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130750689</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)991019-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016298284</subfield><subfield code="x">0733-9399</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:142</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.31</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">142</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Zhou, Hang |
| spellingShingle |
Zhou, Hang ddc 690 bkl 56.11 bkl 50.31 misc Technical Papers Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| authorStr |
Zhou, Hang |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130750689 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0733-9399 |
| topic_title |
690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model Technical Papers |
| topic |
ddc 690 bkl 56.11 bkl 50.31 misc Technical Papers |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 56.11 bkl 50.31 misc Technical Papers |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 56.11 bkl 50.31 misc Technical Papers |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
g k gk h l hl |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of engineering mechanics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130750689 |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of engineering mechanics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130750689 (DE-600)991019-0 (DE-576)016298284 |
| title |
Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1978749848 (DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848 (PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970 (KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel |
| title_full |
Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| author_sort |
Zhou, Hang |
| journal |
Journal of engineering mechanics |
| journalStr |
Journal of engineering mechanics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Zhou, Hang |
| container_volume |
142 |
| class |
690 DNB 56.11 bkl 50.31 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Zhou, Hang |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| title_sort |
upper-bound solution for flat cavity expansion model |
| title_auth |
Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| abstract |
AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. |
| abstractGer |
AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
7 |
| title_short |
Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Kong, Gangqiang Liu, Hanlong |
| author2Str |
Kong, Gangqiang Liu, Hanlong |
| ppnlink |
130750689 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:43:52.621Z |
| _version_ |
1803599617849294848 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1978749848</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220220143246.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1978749848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1978749848</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a710-1259d991e7a78558c94172d98bf3dfbb5d6ca191a5822922b34de1598d962d970</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0009100620160000142000700000upperboundsolutionforflatcavityexpansionmodel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Hang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Upper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technical Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Gangqiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Hanlong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of engineering mechanics</subfield><subfield code="d">Reston, Va. : American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">142(2016), 7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130750689</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)991019-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016298284</subfield><subfield code="x">0733-9399</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:142</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.31</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">142</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3985004 |