Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore
AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from C...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Zhao, Xianbo [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of management in engineering - New York, NY : Soc., 1985, 32(2016), 4 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:32 ; year:2016 ; number:4 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1979258600 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1979258600 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220216054205.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160720 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1979258600 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |q ZDB |
084 | |a 56.00 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 85.06 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhao, Xianbo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers | ||
540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Case Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Case Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk management | |
650 | 4 | |a Construction industry | |
650 | 4 | |a Case studies | |
700 | 1 | |a Singhaputtangkul, Natee |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of management in engineering |d New York, NY : Soc., 1985 |g 32(2016), 4 |w (DE-627)130411922 |w (DE-600)622799-5 |w (DE-576)015914895 |x 0742-597X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 56.00 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 85.06 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 32 |j 2016 |e 4 |
author_variant |
x z xz |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:0742597X:2016----::fetofrcaatrsisnnepieikaaeetaetdocieeosrc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
bklnumber |
56.00 85.06 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Zhao, Xianbo verfasserin aut Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies Singhaputtangkul, Natee oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 32(2016), 4 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 32 2016 4 |
spelling |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Zhao, Xianbo verfasserin aut Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies Singhaputtangkul, Natee oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 32(2016), 4 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 32 2016 4 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Zhao, Xianbo verfasserin aut Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies Singhaputtangkul, Natee oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 32(2016), 4 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 32 2016 4 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Zhao, Xianbo verfasserin aut Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies Singhaputtangkul, Natee oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 32(2016), 4 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 32 2016 4 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Zhao, Xianbo verfasserin aut Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies Singhaputtangkul, Natee oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 32(2016), 4 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 32 2016 4 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering 32(2016), 4 volume:32 year:2016 number:4 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering 32(2016), 4 volume:32 year:2016 number:4 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies |
dewey-raw |
600 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zhao, Xianbo @@aut@@ Singhaputtangkul, Natee @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130411922 |
dewey-sort |
3600 |
id |
OLC1979258600 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1979258600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216054205.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1979258600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Xianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singhaputtangkul, Natee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of management in engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Soc., 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2016), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130411922</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)622799-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015914895</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-597X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Zhao, Xianbo |
spellingShingle |
Zhao, Xianbo ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Case Study misc Case Studies misc Risk management misc Construction industry misc Case studies Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
authorStr |
Zhao, Xianbo |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130411922 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
600 - Technology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0742-597X |
topic_title |
600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore Case Study Case Studies Risk management Construction industry Case studies |
topic |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Case Study misc Case Studies misc Risk management misc Construction industry misc Case studies |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Case Study misc Case Studies misc Risk management misc Construction industry misc Case studies |
topic_browse |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Case Study misc Case Studies misc Risk management misc Construction industry misc Case studies |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
n s ns |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130411922 |
dewey-tens |
600 - Technology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 |
title |
Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1979258600 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600 (PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0 (KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage |
title_full |
Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
author_sort |
Zhao, Xianbo |
journal |
Journal of management in engineering |
journalStr |
Journal of management in engineering |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Zhao, Xianbo |
container_volume |
32 |
class |
600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Zhao, Xianbo |
doi_str_mv |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |
dewey-full |
600 |
title_sort |
effects of firm characteristics on enterprise risk management: case study of chinese construction firms operating in singapore |
title_auth |
Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
abstract |
AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. |
abstractGer |
AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. |
abstract_unstemmed |
AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Singhaputtangkul, Natee |
author2Str |
Singhaputtangkul, Natee |
ppnlink |
130411922 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:28:32.332Z |
_version_ |
1803606202604584960 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1979258600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216054205.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1979258600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1979258600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a944-a8bc946c9e7bb40f452397ef96462abc995b2dc2ab38ff2336497cfd177d406c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0138950520160000032000400000effectsoffirmcharacteristicsonenterpriseriskmanage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Xianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of Firm Characteristics on Enterprise Risk Management: Case Study of Chinese Construction Firms Operating in Singapore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of regulatory pressure, firm ownership, and firm size on enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation in international construction firms. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 35 professionals from Chinese construction firms (CCFs) operating in Singapore. Partial least-squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The analysis results confirmed the three constructs of ERM implementation: commitment and involvement of top management (CITM), communication and understanding (CU), and execution and integration (EI). Additionally, the results showed that: (1) higher regulatory pressure led to a higher level of CITM and EI; (2) a higher level of government ownership contributed to a higher level of CITM, CU, and EI; and (3) larger firm size led to a higher level of CITM and EI. The quantitative results were complemented by qualitative evidence from six semistructured interviews, which validated the proposed framework. These findings are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to the existing body of knowledge on ERM. Additionally, the findings can help management teams tailor their ERM practices in accordance with firm characteristics, thereby contributing to current ERM practices. Although this study is focused on ERM in Singapore-based CCFs, a similar research design and method can be used to investigate the role of firm characteristics in ERM implementations in construction firms located in other countries. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account various firm characteristics for implementation. Therefore, this study contributes to the ERM body of knowledge.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singhaputtangkul, Natee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of management in engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Soc., 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2016), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130411922</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)622799-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015914895</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-597X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000434</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4017105 |