Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe

We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with m...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Hardenbicker, P [verfasserIn] Weitere, M Ritz, S Schöll, F Fischer, H

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Schlagwörter:	bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: River research and applications - Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002, 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:32 ; year:2016 ; number:6 ; pages:1264-1278

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1002/rra.2977

Katalog-ID:	OLC1979311994

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1979311994
003	DE-627
005	20230511235250.0
007	tu
008	160720s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1002/rra.2977 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160720
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1979311994
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994
035			\|a (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3
035			\|a (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 570 \|q ZDB
084			\|a 38.87 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 42.92 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 43.31 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 56.30 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Hardenbicker, P \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
650		4	\|a bivalves
650		4	\|a large rivers
650		4	\|a potamoplankton
650		4	\|a plankton dynamics
650		4	\|a phytoplankton
650		4	\|a Lagrangian approach
650		4	\|a eutrophication
650		4	\|a zooplankton
700	1		\|a Weitere, M \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Ritz, S \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Schöll, F \|4 oth
700	1		\|a Fischer, H \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t River research and applications \|d Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 \|g 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 \|w (DE-627)342894129 \|w (DE-600)2072626-0 \|w (DE-576)262690845 \|x 1535-1459 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:32 \|g year:2016 \|g number:6 \|g pages:1264-1278
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-UMW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-ARC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-TEC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a SSG-OLC-DE-84
912			\|a SSG-OPC-GGO
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4219
936	b	k	\|a 38.87 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 42.92 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 43.31 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 56.30 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 32 \|j 2016 \|e 6 \|h 1264-1278

Indexfelder

author_variant	p h ph
matchkey_str	article:15351459:2016----::ogtdnllntnyaisnhrv
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
bklnumber	38.87 42.92 43.31 56.30
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1002/rra.2977 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Hardenbicker, P verfasserin aut Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton Weitere, M oth Ritz, S oth Schöll, F oth Fischer, H oth Enthalten in River research and applications Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 (DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845 1535-1459 nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219 38.87 AVZ 42.92 AVZ 43.31 AVZ 56.30 AVZ AR 32 2016 6 1264-1278
spelling	10.1002/rra.2977 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Hardenbicker, P verfasserin aut Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton Weitere, M oth Ritz, S oth Schöll, F oth Fischer, H oth Enthalten in River research and applications Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 (DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845 1535-1459 nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219 38.87 AVZ 42.92 AVZ 43.31 AVZ 56.30 AVZ AR 32 2016 6 1264-1278
allfields_unstemmed	10.1002/rra.2977 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Hardenbicker, P verfasserin aut Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton Weitere, M oth Ritz, S oth Schöll, F oth Fischer, H oth Enthalten in River research and applications Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 (DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845 1535-1459 nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219 38.87 AVZ 42.92 AVZ 43.31 AVZ 56.30 AVZ AR 32 2016 6 1264-1278
allfieldsGer	10.1002/rra.2977 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Hardenbicker, P verfasserin aut Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton Weitere, M oth Ritz, S oth Schöll, F oth Fischer, H oth Enthalten in River research and applications Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 (DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845 1535-1459 nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219 38.87 AVZ 42.92 AVZ 43.31 AVZ 56.30 AVZ AR 32 2016 6 1264-1278
allfieldsSound	10.1002/rra.2977 doi PQ20160720 (DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Hardenbicker, P verfasserin aut Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton Weitere, M oth Ritz, S oth Schöll, F oth Fischer, H oth Enthalten in River research and applications Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 (DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845 1535-1459 nnns volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219 38.87 AVZ 42.92 AVZ 43.31 AVZ 56.30 AVZ AR 32 2016 6 1264-1278
language	English
source	Enthalten in River research and applications 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278
sourceStr	Enthalten in River research and applications 32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278 volume:32 year:2016 number:6 pages:1264-1278
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton
dewey-raw	570
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	River research and applications
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Hardenbicker, P @@aut@@ Weitere, M @@oth@@ Ritz, S @@oth@@ Schöll, F @@oth@@ Fischer, H @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	342894129
dewey-sort	3570
id	OLC1979311994
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1979311994</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230511235250.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/rra.2977</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1979311994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.30</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hardenbicker, P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bivalves</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">large rivers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">potamoplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plankton dynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">phytoplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lagrangian approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eutrophication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">zooplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weitere, M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ritz, S</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schöll, F</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fischer, H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">River research and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)342894129</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2072626-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)262690845</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-1459</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1264-1278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.87</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.92</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.31</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.30</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">1264-1278</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Hardenbicker, P
spellingShingle	Hardenbicker, P ddc 570 bkl 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 misc bivalves misc large rivers misc potamoplankton misc plankton dynamics misc phytoplankton misc Lagrangian approach misc eutrophication misc zooplankton Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
authorStr	Hardenbicker, P
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)342894129
format	Article
dewey-ones	570 - Life sciences; biology
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1535-1459
topic_title	570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe bivalves large rivers potamoplankton plankton dynamics phytoplankton Lagrangian approach eutrophication zooplankton
topic	ddc 570 bkl 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 misc bivalves misc large rivers misc potamoplankton misc plankton dynamics misc phytoplankton misc Lagrangian approach misc eutrophication misc zooplankton
topic_unstemmed	ddc 570 bkl 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 misc bivalves misc large rivers misc potamoplankton misc plankton dynamics misc phytoplankton misc Lagrangian approach misc eutrophication misc zooplankton
topic_browse	ddc 570 bkl 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 misc bivalves misc large rivers misc potamoplankton misc plankton dynamics misc phytoplankton misc Lagrangian approach misc eutrophication misc zooplankton
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	m w mw s r sr f s fs h f hf
hierarchy_parent_title	River research and applications
hierarchy_parent_id	342894129
dewey-tens	570 - Life sciences; biology
hierarchy_top_title	River research and applications
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)342894129 (DE-600)2072626-0 (DE-576)262690845
title	Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1979311994 (DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994 (PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3 (KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb
title_full	Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
author_sort	Hardenbicker, P
journal	River research and applications
journalStr	River research and applications
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	500 - Science
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1264
author_browse	Hardenbicker, P
container_volume	32
class	570 ZDB 38.87 bkl 42.92 bkl 43.31 bkl 56.30 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Hardenbicker, P
doi_str_mv	10.1002/rra.2977
dewey-full	570
title_sort	longitudinal plankton dynamics in the rivers rhine and elbe
title_auth	Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
abstract	We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
abstractGer	We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
abstract_unstemmed	We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_4219
container_issue	6
title_short	Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479
remote_bool	false
author2	Weitere, M Ritz, S Schöll, F Fischer, H
author2Str	Weitere, M Ritz, S Schöll, F Fischer, H
ppnlink	342894129
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth oth oth
doi_str	10.1002/rra.2977
up_date	2024-07-04T00:38:19.272Z
_version_	1803606818065219584
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1979311994</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230511235250.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160720s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/rra.2977</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1979311994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1979311994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1197-d7bde848dc93156eccf379faff1e23b31c627cf65abd92cb94dc1310ff89f62c3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0163572720160000032000601264longitudinalplanktondynamicsintheriversrhineandelb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.87</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.92</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.31</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.30</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hardenbicker, P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009–2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine‐km 170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 µg L −1 in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe‐km 4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 µg L −1 in 2009 and 123 µg L −1 in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 µg L −1 in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bivalves</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">large rivers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">potamoplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plankton dynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">phytoplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lagrangian approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eutrophication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">zooplankton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weitere, M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ritz, S</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schöll, F</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fischer, H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">River research and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester, Sussex : Wiley, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2016), 6, Seite 1264-1278</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)342894129</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2072626-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)262690845</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-1459</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1264-1278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.2977</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.2977/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1803641479</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.87</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.92</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.31</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.30</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">1264-1278</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401124

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?