Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion
Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sawicki, Nadia N [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Law & policy - Oxford : Blackwell, 1984, 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:38 ; year:2016 ; number:3 ; pages:211-233 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/lapo.12059 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1980227438 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1980227438 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214195029.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160816s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/lapo.12059 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20161012 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1980227438 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |a 320 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 71.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 86.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sawicki, Nadia N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary | ||
| 540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Social sciences and ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Behavior modification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policy sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Persuasion (Psychology) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political aspects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethical aspects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Psychological aspects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Communication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Government | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Law & policy |d Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 |g 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 |w (DE-627)166057622 |w (DE-600)93132-9 |w (DE-576)017945380 |x 0265-8240 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:211-233 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.80 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 86.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2016 |e 3 |h 211-233 | ||
| author_variant |
n n s nn nns |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:02658240:2016----::tialmttosnhsaeuefrt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
71.80 86.00 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1111/lapo.12059 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Sawicki, Nadia N verfasserin aut Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics Enthalten in Law & policy Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 (DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 0265-8240 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR 71.80 AVZ 86.00 AVZ AR 38 2016 3 211-233 |
| spelling |
10.1111/lapo.12059 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Sawicki, Nadia N verfasserin aut Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics Enthalten in Law & policy Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 (DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 0265-8240 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR 71.80 AVZ 86.00 AVZ AR 38 2016 3 211-233 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/lapo.12059 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Sawicki, Nadia N verfasserin aut Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics Enthalten in Law & policy Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 (DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 0265-8240 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR 71.80 AVZ 86.00 AVZ AR 38 2016 3 211-233 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/lapo.12059 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Sawicki, Nadia N verfasserin aut Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics Enthalten in Law & policy Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 (DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 0265-8240 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR 71.80 AVZ 86.00 AVZ AR 38 2016 3 211-233 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/lapo.12059 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Sawicki, Nadia N verfasserin aut Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary © COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics Enthalten in Law & policy Oxford : Blackwell, 1984 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 (DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 0265-8240 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR 71.80 AVZ 86.00 AVZ AR 38 2016 3 211-233 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Law & policy 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Law & policy 38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233 volume:38 year:2016 number:3 pages:211-233 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Law & policy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sawicki, Nadia N @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
166057622 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1980227438 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1980227438</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195029.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160816s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/lapo.12059</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1980227438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sawicki, Nadia N</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social sciences and ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Behavior modification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Persuasion (Psychology)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Law & policy</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Blackwell, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166057622</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)93132-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)017945380</subfield><subfield code="x">0265-8240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:211-233</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">211-233</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sawicki, Nadia N |
| spellingShingle |
Sawicki, Nadia N ddc 340 bkl 71.80 bkl 86.00 misc Social sciences and ethics misc Behavior modification misc Policy sciences misc Persuasion (Psychology) misc Social ethics misc Political aspects misc Ethical aspects misc Psychological aspects misc Communication misc Studies misc Government misc Public policy misc Ethics Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| authorStr |
Sawicki, Nadia N |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)166057622 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law 320 - Political science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0265-8240 |
| topic_title |
340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion Social sciences and ethics Behavior modification Policy sciences Persuasion (Psychology) Social ethics Political aspects Ethical aspects Psychological aspects Communication Studies Government Public policy Ethics |
| topic |
ddc 340 bkl 71.80 bkl 86.00 misc Social sciences and ethics misc Behavior modification misc Policy sciences misc Persuasion (Psychology) misc Social ethics misc Political aspects misc Ethical aspects misc Psychological aspects misc Communication misc Studies misc Government misc Public policy misc Ethics |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 bkl 71.80 bkl 86.00 misc Social sciences and ethics misc Behavior modification misc Policy sciences misc Persuasion (Psychology) misc Social ethics misc Political aspects misc Ethical aspects misc Psychological aspects misc Communication misc Studies misc Government misc Public policy misc Ethics |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 bkl 71.80 bkl 86.00 misc Social sciences and ethics misc Behavior modification misc Policy sciences misc Persuasion (Psychology) misc Social ethics misc Political aspects misc Ethical aspects misc Psychological aspects misc Communication misc Studies misc Government misc Public policy misc Ethics |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Law & policy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
166057622 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law 320 - Political science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Law & policy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)166057622 (DE-600)93132-9 (DE-576)017945380 |
| title |
Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1980227438 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438 (PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740 (KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas |
| title_full |
Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| author_sort |
Sawicki, Nadia N |
| journal |
Law & policy |
| journalStr |
Law & policy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
211 |
| author_browse |
Sawicki, Nadia N |
| container_volume |
38 |
| class |
340 320 DNB 71.80 bkl 86.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sawicki, Nadia N |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/lapo.12059 |
| dewey-full |
340 320 |
| title_sort |
ethical limitations on the state's use of arational persuasion |
| title_auth |
Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| abstract |
Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. |
| abstractGer |
Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
166057622 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/lapo.12059 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:40:13.513Z |
| _version_ |
1803614487594401792 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1980227438</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214195029.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160816s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/lapo.12059</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1980227438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1980227438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2179-c302e2a7c566cb82f789759310a4da5b2ca0951d5a0f9d0b3120f110970c0c740</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0093912920160000038000300211ethicallimitationsonthestatesuseofarationalpersuas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sawicki, Nadia N</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Policy makers frequently use arational appeals and nudges—such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging—to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers rather than reasoned argument. This article develops a fuller account of the nonconsequentialist objection to arational persuasion by state actors, focusing on theories of decisional autonomy and metadecisional voluntariness. The article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to both critics and advocates of arational persuasion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2016 The Author Law & Policy © 2016 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social sciences and ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Behavior modification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Persuasion (Psychology)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Law & policy</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Blackwell, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2016), 3, Seite 211-233</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166057622</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)93132-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)017945380</subfield><subfield code="x">0265-8240</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:211-233</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12059</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12059/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804135244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">211-233</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4004145 |