Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners

Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and ef...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Urciuoli, Luca [verfasserIn] Hintsa, Juha

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Schlagwörter:	Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: The international journal of logistics management - Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990, 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:27 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:418-437

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034

Katalog-ID:	OLC1980540756

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1980540756
003	DE-627
005	20230714205523.0
007	tu
008	160816s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160815
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1980540756
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756
035			\|a (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30
035			\|a (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 380 \|q DNB
100	1		\|a Urciuoli, Luca \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
650		4	\|a Logistics
650		4	\|a Management science & operations
650		4	\|a Journals
650		4	\|a Research & development--R&D
650		4	\|a Studies
650		4	\|a Perceptions
650		4	\|a Cargos
650		4	\|a Supply chains
700	1		\|a Hintsa, Juha \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t The international journal of logistics management \|d Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 \|g 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 \|w (DE-627)130872229 \|w (DE-600)1034825-6 \|w (DE-576)023113375 \|x 0957-4093 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:27 \|g year:2016 \|g number:2 \|g pages:418-437
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_648
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4036
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 27 \|j 2016 \|e 2 \|h 418-437

Indexfelder

author_variant	l u lu
matchkey_str	article:09574093:2016----::ifrneiscrtrspretosewelgsiso
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 doi PQ20160815 (DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 DNB Urciuoli, Luca verfasserin aut Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains Hintsa, Juha oth Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 (DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375 0957-4093 nnns volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 27 2016 2 418-437
spelling	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 doi PQ20160815 (DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 DNB Urciuoli, Luca verfasserin aut Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains Hintsa, Juha oth Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 (DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375 0957-4093 nnns volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 27 2016 2 418-437
allfields_unstemmed	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 doi PQ20160815 (DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 DNB Urciuoli, Luca verfasserin aut Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains Hintsa, Juha oth Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 (DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375 0957-4093 nnns volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 27 2016 2 418-437
allfieldsGer	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 doi PQ20160815 (DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 DNB Urciuoli, Luca verfasserin aut Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains Hintsa, Juha oth Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 (DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375 0957-4093 nnns volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 27 2016 2 418-437
allfieldsSound	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 doi PQ20160815 (DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 DNB Urciuoli, Luca verfasserin aut Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains Hintsa, Juha oth Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 (DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375 0957-4093 nnns volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 27 2016 2 418-437
language	English
source	Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437
sourceStr	Enthalten in The international journal of logistics management 27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437 volume:27 year:2016 number:2 pages:418-437
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains
dewey-raw	380
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	The international journal of logistics management
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Urciuoli, Luca @@aut@@ Hintsa, Juha @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	130872229
dewey-sort	3380
id	OLC1980540756
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1980540756</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714205523.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160816s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1980540756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urciuoli, Luca</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Management science & operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Journals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research & development--R&D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cargos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hintsa, Juha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of logistics management</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130872229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1034825-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023113375</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4093</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:418-437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">418-437</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Urciuoli, Luca
spellingShingle	Urciuoli, Luca ddc 380 misc Logistics misc Management science & operations misc Journals misc Research & development--R&D misc Studies misc Perceptions misc Cargos misc Supply chains Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
authorStr	Urciuoli, Luca
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)130872229
format	Article
dewey-ones	380 - Commerce, communications & transportation
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0957-4093
topic_title	380 DNB Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners Logistics Management science & operations Journals Research & development--R&D Studies Perceptions Cargos Supply chains
topic	ddc 380 misc Logistics misc Management science & operations misc Journals misc Research & development--R&D misc Studies misc Perceptions misc Cargos misc Supply chains
topic_unstemmed	ddc 380 misc Logistics misc Management science & operations misc Journals misc Research & development--R&D misc Studies misc Perceptions misc Cargos misc Supply chains
topic_browse	ddc 380 misc Logistics misc Management science & operations misc Journals misc Research & development--R&D misc Studies misc Perceptions misc Cargos misc Supply chains
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	j h jh
hierarchy_parent_title	The international journal of logistics management
hierarchy_parent_id	130872229
dewey-tens	380 - Commerce, communications & transportation
hierarchy_top_title	The international journal of logistics management
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)130872229 (DE-600)1034825-6 (DE-576)023113375
title	Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1980540756 (DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756 (PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30 (KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti
title_full	Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
author_sort	Urciuoli, Luca
journal	The international journal of logistics management
journalStr	The international journal of logistics management
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	418
author_browse	Urciuoli, Luca
container_volume	27
class	380 DNB
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Urciuoli, Luca
doi_str_mv	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034
dewey-full	380
title_sort	differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
title_auth	Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
abstract	Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.
abstractGer	Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.
abstract_unstemmed	Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_648 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4036 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178
remote_bool	false
author2	Hintsa, Juha
author2Str	Hintsa, Juha
ppnlink	130872229
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth
doi_str	10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034
up_date	2024-07-04T03:17:38.222Z
_version_	1803616841345531904
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1980540756</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714205523.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160816s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1980540756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1980540756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1118-87f659bb7d832d34673e7f22b464b6d17de4bae9beb0be2316b257352ff78ca30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0191731520160000027000200418differencesinsecurityriskperceptionsbetweenlogisti</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urciuoli, Luca</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – Supply chain stakeholders may perceive security risks differently and thereby misalign mitigation strategies. Hence, causing weak spots in supply chains and thereby disruptions. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether supply chain companies actually perceive security risks and effectiveness of mitigation strategies differently. Design/methodology/approach – Two survey studies measuring perception of security risks and effectiveness of measures have been developed and used to collect data from European and Latin American companies, grouped as cargo owners and logistics companies. Findings – The findings of the surveys unveil that only two (out of six) security risks, namely, violation of customs non-fiscal regulations and illegal immigration, show significant differences between the two groups of companies. In addition, the surveys show that companies perceive equally the effectiveness of security measures. This study concludes that supply chains seem to have good visibility over the security risks of their partners. Hence, in terms of security, supply chain companies seem to have achieved a common understanding of risks and furthermore are able to act jointly to secure assets and operations. Originality/value – Previous research claim supply chain stakeholders may perceive risks differently and thereby may fail to correctly align mitigation strategies. Yet, to the authors knowledge, previous research has not empirically demonstrated these differences in perceptions of risks and mitigation strategies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Management science & operations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Journals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research & development--R&D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cargos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supply chains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hintsa, Juha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of logistics management</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2016), 2, Seite 418-437</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130872229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1034825-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023113375</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4093</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:418-437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0034</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1806646178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">418-437</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4006615

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Differences in security risk perceptions between logistics companies and cargo owners

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?