Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600
Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head inju...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research - Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997, 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:59 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; pages:759 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1981180303 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1981180303 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230714211230.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20161012 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1981180303 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 400 |a 610 |a 150 |q DNB |
084 | |a LING |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association | ||
650 | 4 | |a Brain | |
650 | 4 | |a Research | |
650 | 4 | |a Brain research | |
650 | 4 | |a Speech production | |
650 | 4 | |a Injuries | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |d Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 |g 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 |w (DE-627)225688409 |w (DE-600)1364086-0 |w (DE-576)058273263 |x 1092-4388 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:759 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-LING | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 59 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 759 |
author_variant |
s e k d sek sekd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:10924388:2016----::etnercsignruaibannuyv |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 610 150 DNB LING fid Key-DeLyria, Sarah E verfasserin aut Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 (DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 1092-4388 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 59 2016 4 759 |
spelling |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 610 150 DNB LING fid Key-DeLyria, Sarah E verfasserin aut Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 (DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 1092-4388 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 59 2016 4 759 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 610 150 DNB LING fid Key-DeLyria, Sarah E verfasserin aut Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 (DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 1092-4388 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 59 2016 4 759 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 610 150 DNB LING fid Key-DeLyria, Sarah E verfasserin aut Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 (DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 1092-4388 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 59 2016 4 759 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 610 150 DNB LING fid Key-DeLyria, Sarah E verfasserin aut Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 (DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 1092-4388 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 Volltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 59 2016 4 759 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research 59(2016), 4, Seite 759 volume:59 year:2016 number:4 pages:759 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries |
dewey-raw |
400 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
225688409 |
dewey-sort |
3400 |
id |
OLC1981180303 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1981180303</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714211230.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1981180303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Key-DeLyria, Sarah E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Speech production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Injuries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</subfield><subfield code="d">Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2016), 4, Seite 759</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)225688409</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1364086-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)058273263</subfield><subfield code="x">1092-4388</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">759</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |
spellingShingle |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E ddc 400 fid LING misc Brain misc Research misc Brain research misc Speech production misc Injuries Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
authorStr |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)225688409 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
400 - Language 610 - Medicine & health 150 - Psychology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1092-4388 |
topic_title |
400 610 150 DNB LING fid Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 Brain Research Brain research Speech production Injuries |
topic |
ddc 400 fid LING misc Brain misc Research misc Brain research misc Speech production misc Injuries |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 400 fid LING misc Brain misc Research misc Brain research misc Speech production misc Injuries |
topic_browse |
ddc 400 fid LING misc Brain misc Research misc Brain research misc Speech production misc Injuries |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
225688409 |
dewey-tens |
400 - Language 610 - Medicine & health 150 - Psychology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)225688409 (DE-600)1364086-0 (DE-576)058273263 |
title |
Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1981180303 (DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303 (PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0 (KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr |
title_full |
Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
author_sort |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |
journal |
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
journalStr |
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
400 - Language 600 - Technology 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
759 |
author_browse |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |
container_volume |
59 |
class |
400 610 150 DNB LING fid |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Key-DeLyria, Sarah E |
doi_str_mv |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 |
dewey-full |
400 610 150 |
title_sort |
sentence processing in traumatic brain injury: evidence from the p600 |
title_auth |
Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
abstract |
Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. |
abstractGer |
Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
225688409 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:25:10.651Z |
_version_ |
1803621090617982976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1981180303</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714211230.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1981180303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1981180303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1469-fc6893d751277a4af17c5c4fecc573de71f8790b069c0b4ae5bc45e65064b3cc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0012001420160000059000400759sentenceprocessingintraumaticbraininjuryevidencefr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Key-DeLyria, Sarah E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sentence processing can be affected following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to linguistic or cognitive deficits. Language-related event-related potentials (ERPs), particularly the P600, have not been described in individuals with TBI history. Four young adults with a history of closed head injury participated. Two had severe injuries, and 2 had mild-moderate injuries more than 24 months prior to testing. ERPs were recorded while participants read sentences designed to be grammatically correct or incorrect. Participants also completed cognitive and sentence comprehension measures. One participant with TBI was significantly different than the control group on several behavioral sentence measures and 1 cognitive measure. However, none of the participants with TBI had a reliable P600 effect. Nonparametric bootstrapping indicated that the ERP was reliable in 10 control participants but no participants with TBI history. There were few behavioral differences between individuals with TBI history and the control group, though all reported subjective difficulty with reading. The P600 was absent in the TBI group in this study. Given the heterogeneity of individuals with TBI and the difficulty in assessing subtle language impairments, exploring the P600 further may provide useful insight into language processing difficulties.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2016 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Speech production</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Injuries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</subfield><subfield code="d">Rockville, Md. : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2016), 4, Seite 759</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)225688409</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1364086-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)058273263</subfield><subfield code="x">1092-4388</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0104</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27387526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">759</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4016075 |