Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture
Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and feca...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Haack, Sheridan K [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The science of the total environment - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972, 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:563-564 ; year:2016 ; pages:340-350 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1982143258 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1982143258 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714214006.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170206 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1982143258 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 333.7 |a 610 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Haack, Sheridan K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Duris, Joseph W |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kolpin, Dana W |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Focazio, Michael J |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meyer, Michael T |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Johnson, Heather E |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oster, Ryan J |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Foreman, William T |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The science of the total environment |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 |g 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 |w (DE-627)129297917 |w (DE-600)121506-1 |w (DE-576)014490919 |x 0048-9697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:563-564 |g year:2016 |g pages:340-350 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 563-564 |j 2016 |h 340-350 | ||
| author_variant |
s k h sk skh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00489697:2016----::otmntowtbceilontcahgneeiusrasnlecdyay |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 333.7 610 DNB Haack, Sheridan K verfasserin aut Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. Duris, Joseph W oth Kolpin, Dana W oth Focazio, Michael J oth Meyer, Michael T oth Johnson, Heather E oth Oster, Ryan J oth Foreman, William T oth Enthalten in The science of the total environment Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 (DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 0048-9697 nnns volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 563-564 2016 340-350 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 333.7 610 DNB Haack, Sheridan K verfasserin aut Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. Duris, Joseph W oth Kolpin, Dana W oth Focazio, Michael J oth Meyer, Michael T oth Johnson, Heather E oth Oster, Ryan J oth Foreman, William T oth Enthalten in The science of the total environment Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 (DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 0048-9697 nnns volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 563-564 2016 340-350 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 333.7 610 DNB Haack, Sheridan K verfasserin aut Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. Duris, Joseph W oth Kolpin, Dana W oth Focazio, Michael J oth Meyer, Michael T oth Johnson, Heather E oth Oster, Ryan J oth Foreman, William T oth Enthalten in The science of the total environment Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 (DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 0048-9697 nnns volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 563-564 2016 340-350 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 333.7 610 DNB Haack, Sheridan K verfasserin aut Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. Duris, Joseph W oth Kolpin, Dana W oth Focazio, Michael J oth Meyer, Michael T oth Johnson, Heather E oth Oster, Ryan J oth Foreman, William T oth Enthalten in The science of the total environment Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 (DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 0048-9697 nnns volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 563-564 2016 340-350 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 333.7 610 DNB Haack, Sheridan K verfasserin aut Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V. Duris, Joseph W oth Kolpin, Dana W oth Focazio, Michael J oth Meyer, Michael T oth Johnson, Heather E oth Oster, Ryan J oth Foreman, William T oth Enthalten in The science of the total environment Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 (DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 0048-9697 nnns volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 Volltext http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 563-564 2016 340-350 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The science of the total environment 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The science of the total environment 563-564(2016), Seite 340-350 volume:563-564 year:2016 pages:340-350 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The science of the total environment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Haack, Sheridan K @@aut@@ Duris, Joseph W @@oth@@ Kolpin, Dana W @@oth@@ Focazio, Michael J @@oth@@ Meyer, Michael T @@oth@@ Johnson, Heather E @@oth@@ Oster, Ryan J @@oth@@ Foreman, William T @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129297917 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
OLC1982143258 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1982143258</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714214006.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1982143258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haack, Sheridan K</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duris, Joseph W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kolpin, Dana W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Focazio, Michael J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meyer, Michael T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Heather E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oster, Ryan J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, William T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The science of the total environment</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972</subfield><subfield code="g">563-564(2016), Seite 340-350</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129297917</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)121506-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014490919</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-9697</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:563-564</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:340-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">563-564</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">340-350</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Haack, Sheridan K |
| spellingShingle |
Haack, Sheridan K ddc 570 Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| authorStr |
Haack, Sheridan K |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129297917 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 333 - Economics of land & energy 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0048-9697 |
| topic_title |
570 333.7 610 DNB Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| topic |
ddc 570 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
j w d jw jwd d w k dw dwk m j f mj mjf m t m mt mtm h e j he hej r j o rj rjo w t f wt wtf |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The science of the total environment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129297917 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 330 - Economics 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The science of the total environment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129297917 (DE-600)121506-1 (DE-576)014490919 |
| title |
Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1982143258 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258 (PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50 (KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu |
| title_full |
Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| author_sort |
Haack, Sheridan K |
| journal |
The science of the total environment |
| journalStr |
The science of the total environment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
340 |
| author_browse |
Haack, Sheridan K |
| container_volume |
563-564 |
| class |
570 333.7 610 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Haack, Sheridan K |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 |
| dewey-full |
570 333.7 610 |
| title_sort |
contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in u.s. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| title_auth |
Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| abstract |
Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. |
| abstractGer |
Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| title_short |
Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Duris, Joseph W Kolpin, Dana W Focazio, Michael J Meyer, Michael T Johnson, Heather E Oster, Ryan J Foreman, William T |
| author2Str |
Duris, Joseph W Kolpin, Dana W Focazio, Michael J Meyer, Michael T Johnson, Heather E Oster, Ryan J Foreman, William T |
| ppnlink |
129297917 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:07:27.246Z |
| _version_ |
1803574677073821696 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1982143258</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714214006.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1982143258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1982143258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2427-1109cc922f479eea8cbefa64cdb91a43d8a65d1bdd572ce9d7cb60643adf47c50</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0073664320160000563000000340contaminationwithbacterialzoonoticpathogengenesinu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haack, Sheridan K</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Animal waste, stream water, and streambed sediment from 19 small (<32km(2)) watersheds in 12U.S. states having either no major animal agriculture (control, n=4), or predominantly beef (n=4), dairy (n=3), swine (n=5), or poultry (n=3) were tested for: 1) cholesterol, coprostanol, estrone, and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations, and 2) shiga-toxin producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and pathogenic and vancomycin-resistant enterococci by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on enrichments, and/or direct quantitative PCR. Pathogen genes were most frequently detected in dairy wastes, followed by beef, swine and poultry wastes in that order; there was only one detection of an animal-source-specific pathogen gene (stx1) in any water or sediment sample in any control watershed. Post-rainfall pathogen gene numbers in stream water were significantly correlated with FIB, cholesterol and coprostanol concentrations, and were most highly correlated in dairy watershed samples collected from 3 different states. Although collected across multiple states and ecoregions, animal-waste gene profiles were distinctive via discriminant analysis. Stream water gene profiles could also be discriminated by the watershed animal type. Although pathogen genes were not abundant in stream water or streambed samples, PCR on enrichments indicated that many genes were from viable organisms, including several (shiga-toxin producing or enterotoxigenic E. coli, Salmonella, vancomycin-resistant enterococci) that could potentially affect either human or animal health. Pathogen gene numbers and types in stream water samples were influenced most by animal type, by local factors such as whether animals had stream access, and by the amount of local rainfall, and not by studied watershed soil or physical characteristics. Our results indicated that stream water in small agricultural U.S. watersheds was susceptible to pathogen gene inputs under typical agricultural practices and environmental conditions. Pathogen gene profiles may offer the potential to address both source of, and risks associated with, fecal pollution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Published by Elsevier B.V.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duris, Joseph W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kolpin, Dana W</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Focazio, Michael J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meyer, Michael T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Heather E</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oster, Ryan J</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, William T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The science of the total environment</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1972</subfield><subfield code="g">563-564(2016), Seite 340-350</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129297917</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)121506-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014490919</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-9697</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:563-564</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:340-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.087</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969716307677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27139306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">563-564</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">340-350</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3988733 |