The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic
How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the developme...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Allen, Leah Claire [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Signs - Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975, 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:42 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; pages:49-70 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1086/686977 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1982209488 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1982209488 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220217001443.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1086/686977 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20161012 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1982209488 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |a 070 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 71.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Allen, Leah Claire |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminist criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminist literary criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sexuality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Literary criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pornography & obscenity | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Signs |d Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 |g 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 |w (DE-627)129442356 |w (DE-600)195284-5 |w (DE-576)014812037 |x 0097-9740 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:49-70 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 49-70 | ||
| author_variant |
l c a lc lca |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00979740:2016----::hpesrsfagruciiimnepeignrawr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| bklnumber |
71.00 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1086/686977 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl Allen, Leah Claire verfasserin aut The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity Enthalten in Signs Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 (DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 0097-9740 nnns volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 Volltext http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 71.00 AVZ AR 42 2016 1 49-70 |
| spelling |
10.1086/686977 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl Allen, Leah Claire verfasserin aut The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity Enthalten in Signs Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 (DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 0097-9740 nnns volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 Volltext http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 71.00 AVZ AR 42 2016 1 49-70 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1086/686977 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl Allen, Leah Claire verfasserin aut The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity Enthalten in Signs Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 (DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 0097-9740 nnns volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 Volltext http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 71.00 AVZ AR 42 2016 1 49-70 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1086/686977 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl Allen, Leah Claire verfasserin aut The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity Enthalten in Signs Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 (DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 0097-9740 nnns volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 Volltext http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 71.00 AVZ AR 42 2016 1 49-70 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1086/686977 doi PQ20161012 (DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl Allen, Leah Claire verfasserin aut The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity Enthalten in Signs Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 (DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 0097-9740 nnns volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 Volltext http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 71.00 AVZ AR 42 2016 1 49-70 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Signs 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Signs 42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70 volume:42 year:2016 number:1 pages:49-70 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Signs |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Allen, Leah Claire @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129442356 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC1982209488 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1982209488</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217001443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1086/686977</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1982209488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, Leah Claire</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminist criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminist literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sexuality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pornography & obscenity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Signs</subfield><subfield code="d">Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129442356</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)195284-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014812037</subfield><subfield code="x">0097-9740</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:49-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">49-70</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Allen, Leah Claire |
| spellingShingle |
Allen, Leah Claire ddc 300 bkl 71.00 misc Feminist criticism misc Analysis misc Feminist literary criticism misc Sexuality misc Literary criticism misc Feminism misc Pornography & obscenity The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| authorStr |
Allen, Leah Claire |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129442356 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences 070 - News media, journalism & publishing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0097-9740 |
| topic_title |
300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic Feminist criticism Analysis Feminist literary criticism Sexuality Literary criticism Feminism Pornography & obscenity |
| topic |
ddc 300 bkl 71.00 misc Feminist criticism misc Analysis misc Feminist literary criticism misc Sexuality misc Literary criticism misc Feminism misc Pornography & obscenity |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 bkl 71.00 misc Feminist criticism misc Analysis misc Feminist literary criticism misc Sexuality misc Literary criticism misc Feminism misc Pornography & obscenity |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 bkl 71.00 misc Feminist criticism misc Analysis misc Feminist literary criticism misc Sexuality misc Literary criticism misc Feminism misc Pornography & obscenity |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Signs |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129442356 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 070 - News media, journalism & publishing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Signs |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129442356 (DE-600)195284-5 (DE-576)014812037 |
| title |
The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1982209488 (DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488 (PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440 (KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo |
| title_full |
The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| author_sort |
Allen, Leah Claire |
| journal |
Signs |
| journalStr |
Signs |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
49 |
| author_browse |
Allen, Leah Claire |
| container_volume |
42 |
| class |
300 070 DE-600 71.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Allen, Leah Claire |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1086/686977 |
| dewey-full |
300 070 |
| title_sort |
pleasures of dangerous criticism: interpreting andrea dworkin as a literary critic |
| title_auth |
The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| abstract |
How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. |
| abstractGer |
How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4318 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977 http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129442356 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1086/686977 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:22:43.941Z |
| _version_ |
1803575638300295168 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1982209488</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217001443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161013s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1086/686977</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1982209488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1982209488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1117-c2d2aefcee5aec3dbcfd3438593b1f1ccc1dfb649f984e1bbe88a6520bf00d440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0078182720160000042000100049pleasuresofdangerouscriticisminterpretingandreadwo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">070</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, Leah Claire</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Pleasures of Dangerous Criticism: Interpreting Andrea Dworkin as a Literary Critic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How does it change the accepted history of the sex wars to consider the debates as part of a conversation about literary representation? What happens when Andrea Dworkin is analyzed as a literary critic? Although usually cast as social critics, participants in the sex wars were part of the development of feminist literary criticism as a distinct field of literary interpretation. Feminists on all sides of the debates about pornography and censorship read pornography. That is, they deployed strategies borrowed from literary criticism to interpret it, and they based their understanding of the dynamics of pornographic consumption on the relationship between author and reader that was established through earlier feminist debates about literature in the 1970s. This article reads literature’s presence in the sex wars to argue that Dworkin was first and foremost a literary critic and also an unexpected ancestor of queer theory. In addition, I contend that many of the debates that were putatively about sexual practices were in fact about representation in ways that relied on and helped generate the project we now call feminist literary criticism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminist criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminist literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sexuality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Literary criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pornography & obscenity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Signs</subfield><subfield code="d">Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1975</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2016), 1, Seite 49-70</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129442356</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)195284-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014812037</subfield><subfield code="x">0097-9740</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:49-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686977</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/686977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1825911119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">49-70</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3980246 |