Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts

The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are n...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lothar Kuhlen [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Schlagwörter:	evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Analyse & Kritik - Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979, 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:38 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; pages:371-390

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1515/auk-2016-0118

Katalog-ID:	OLC1985186691

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1985186691
003	DE-627
005	20230714225951.0
007	tu
008	161202s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1515/auk-2016-0118 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20170206
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1985186691
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691
035			\|a (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530
035			\|a (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 300 \|q DE-101
084			\|a LING \|2 fid
100	0		\|a Lothar Kuhlen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.
650		4	\|a evolution of norms
650		4	\|a principle of legal certainty
650		4	\|a Criminal law
650		4	\|a judicial law making
650		4	\|a separation of powers
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Analyse & Kritik \|d Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 \|g 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 \|w (DE-627)130263893 \|w (DE-600)558867-4 \|w (DE-576)015829731 \|x 0171-5860 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:38 \|g year:2016 \|g number:2 \|g pages:371-390
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-LING
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_49
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_130
912			\|a GBV_ILN_131
912			\|a GBV_ILN_267
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4028
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4193
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4277
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4310
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4314
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4315
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4316
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4317
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4319
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 38 \|j 2016 \|e 2 \|h 371-390

Indexfelder

author_variant	l k lk
matchkey_str	article:01715860:2016----::eznvnehsomnnebrkihiugepaidse
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1515/auk-2016-0118 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 DE-101 LING fid Lothar Kuhlen verfasserin aut Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court. evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 (DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731 0171-5860 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 38 2016 2 371-390
spelling	10.1515/auk-2016-0118 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 DE-101 LING fid Lothar Kuhlen verfasserin aut Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court. evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 (DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731 0171-5860 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 38 2016 2 371-390
allfields_unstemmed	10.1515/auk-2016-0118 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 DE-101 LING fid Lothar Kuhlen verfasserin aut Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court. evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 (DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731 0171-5860 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 38 2016 2 371-390
allfieldsGer	10.1515/auk-2016-0118 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 DE-101 LING fid Lothar Kuhlen verfasserin aut Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court. evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 (DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731 0171-5860 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 38 2016 2 371-390
allfieldsSound	10.1515/auk-2016-0118 doi PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 DE-101 LING fid Lothar Kuhlen verfasserin aut Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court. evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 (DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731 0171-5860 nnns volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 38 2016 2 371-390
language	English
source	Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390
sourceStr	Enthalten in Analyse & Kritik 38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390 volume:38 year:2016 number:2 pages:371-390
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers
dewey-raw	300
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Analyse & Kritik
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lothar Kuhlen @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	130263893
dewey-sort	3300
id	OLC1985186691
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1985186691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714225951.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1985186691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lothar Kuhlen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evolution of norms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">principle of legal certainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judicial law making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">separation of powers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Analyse & Kritik</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130263893</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)558867-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015829731</subfield><subfield code="x">0171-5860</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:371-390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4316</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">371-390</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Lothar Kuhlen
spellingShingle	Lothar Kuhlen ddc 300 fid LING misc evolution of norms misc principle of legal certainty misc Criminal law misc judicial law making misc separation of powers Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
authorStr	Lothar Kuhlen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)130263893
format	Article
dewey-ones	300 - Social sciences
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0171-5860
topic_title	300 DE-101 LING fid Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts evolution of norms principle of legal certainty Criminal law judicial law making separation of powers
topic	ddc 300 fid LING misc evolution of norms misc principle of legal certainty misc Criminal law misc judicial law making misc separation of powers
topic_unstemmed	ddc 300 fid LING misc evolution of norms misc principle of legal certainty misc Criminal law misc judicial law making misc separation of powers
topic_browse	ddc 300 fid LING misc evolution of norms misc principle of legal certainty misc Criminal law misc judicial law making misc separation of powers
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Analyse & Kritik
hierarchy_parent_id	130263893
dewey-tens	300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
hierarchy_top_title	Analyse & Kritik
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)130263893 (DE-600)558867-4 (DE-576)015829731
title	Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1985186691 (DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691 (PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530 (KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi
title_full	Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
author_sort	Lothar Kuhlen
journal	Analyse & Kritik
journalStr	Analyse & Kritik
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	371
author_browse	Lothar Kuhlen
container_volume	38
class	300 DE-101 LING fid
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Lothar Kuhlen
doi_str_mv	10.1515/auk-2016-0118
dewey-full	300
title_sort	setzung von rechtsnormen unter berücksichtigung der praxis: das beispiel des strafrechts
title_auth	Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
abstract	The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.
abstractGer	The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.
abstract_unstemmed	The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_131 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4315 GBV_ILN_4316 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4326
container_issue	2
title_short	Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118 http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	130263893
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1515/auk-2016-0118
up_date	2024-07-04T02:25:53.198Z
_version_	1803613585486643200
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1985186691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714225951.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1985186691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1985186691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c901-3b8060b19560c143d2c04acbd6949eaabc838d6ee598e6b34658c83682830530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0106123220160000038000200371setzungvonrechtsnormenunterbercksichtigungderpraxi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lothar Kuhlen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article examines - with a multitude of examples - the complex method, in which criminal rules evolve in contemporary law. This happens in a continuing process, to which - in addition to the citizens - the legislator, criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court contribute. The courts are not confined to applying the laws enacted by the legislator, which would be in accordance to a simple model of the separation of powers. The laws rather have to undergo an on-road test by the courts, during which they can prove to be practicable, difficult to handle or not practicable at all and therefore void. The legislator for his part takes note of the judicature and that often brings him to make further decisions. These include the abstaining from establishing new laws, the (plain or modifying) reception of some jurisdictional opinions, the changing of laws against their jurisdictional interpretation and the transformation of other than the jurisdictionally interpreted laws. All in all the criminal law proves to be a good example for the incremental evolution of norms, which occurs in a specific division of labour between the legislator, the criminal courts and the Federal Constitution Court.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evolution of norms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">principle of legal certainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judicial law making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">separation of powers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Analyse & Kritik</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 1979</subfield><subfield code="g">38(2016), 2, Seite 371-390</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130263893</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)558867-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015829731</subfield><subfield code="x">0171-5860</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:371-390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/auk-2016-0118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4315</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4316</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">371-390</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3993464

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Setzung von Rechtsnormen unter Berücksichtigung der Praxis: Das Beispiel des Strafrechts

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?