From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania
This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisatio...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Bendix, Daniel [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Postcolonial studies - London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998, 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:19 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; pages:53-18 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1986226859 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1986226859 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714233857.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20161201 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1986226859 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 050 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bendix, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Postcolonial studies |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 |g 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 |w (DE-627)240142209 |w (DE-600)1412469-5 |w (DE-576)090829557 |x 1368-8790 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:53-18 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SAS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MFO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ASS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-ANG | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 19 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 53-18 | ||
| author_variant |
d b db |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13688790:2016----::rmihigneppltotcrigouainrwhrcnclnapwrnemnee |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 doi PQ20161201 (DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 DNB Bendix, Daniel verfasserin aut From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 Enthalten in Postcolonial studies London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 (DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 1368-8790 nnns volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 AR 19 2016 1 53-18 |
| spelling |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 doi PQ20161201 (DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 DNB Bendix, Daniel verfasserin aut From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 Enthalten in Postcolonial studies London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 (DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 1368-8790 nnns volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 AR 19 2016 1 53-18 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 doi PQ20161201 (DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 DNB Bendix, Daniel verfasserin aut From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 Enthalten in Postcolonial studies London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 (DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 1368-8790 nnns volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 AR 19 2016 1 53-18 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 doi PQ20161201 (DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 DNB Bendix, Daniel verfasserin aut From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 Enthalten in Postcolonial studies London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 (DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 1368-8790 nnns volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 AR 19 2016 1 53-18 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 doi PQ20161201 (DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 DNB Bendix, Daniel verfasserin aut From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016 Enthalten in Postcolonial studies London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 (DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 1368-8790 nnns volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 AR 19 2016 1 53-18 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Postcolonial studies 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Postcolonial studies 19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18 volume:19 year:2016 number:1 pages:53-18 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
050 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Postcolonial studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bendix, Daniel @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
240142209 |
| dewey-sort |
250 |
| id |
OLC1986226859 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1986226859</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714233857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161201</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1986226859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bendix, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Postcolonial studies</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)240142209</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1412469-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090829557</subfield><subfield code="x">1368-8790</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:53-18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ASS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">53-18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Bendix, Daniel |
| spellingShingle |
Bendix, Daniel ddc 050 From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| authorStr |
Bendix, Daniel |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)240142209 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
050 - General serial publications |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1368-8790 |
| topic_title |
050 DNB From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| topic |
ddc 050 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 050 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 050 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Postcolonial studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
240142209 |
| dewey-tens |
050 - Magazines, journals & serials |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Postcolonial studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)240142209 (DE-600)1412469-5 (DE-576)090829557 |
| title |
From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1986226859 (DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859 (PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00 (KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow |
| title_full |
From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| author_sort |
Bendix, Daniel |
| journal |
Postcolonial studies |
| journalStr |
Postcolonial studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
53 |
| author_browse |
Bendix, Daniel |
| container_volume |
19 |
| class |
050 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Bendix, Daniel |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |
| dewey-full |
050 |
| title_sort |
from fighting underpopulation to curbing population growth: tracing colonial power in german development interventions in tanzania |
| title_auth |
From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| abstract |
This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. |
| abstractGer |
This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OLC-ASS SSG-OPC-ANG GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
240142209 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:15:31.660Z |
| _version_ |
1803620483502964736 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1986226859</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714233857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20161201</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1986226859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1986226859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1557-c225af0440ddea9bda4361d3c340c685fdcff1174592fddff452adc443f174d00</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0353810920160000019000100053fromfightingunderpopulationtocurbingpopulationgrow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bendix, Daniel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">From Fighting Underpopulation to Curbing Population Growth: Tracing Colonial Power in German Development Interventions in Tanzania</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates how colonial power is rearticulated in policy and practice of German development cooperation in Tanzania. Drawing on archives and interviews, it analyses the emergence of interventions with regard to population control and reproductive health during Germany's colonisation of 'German East Africa' and compares these interventions to present-day German development assistance in Tanzania. While German policies during colonial rule addressed 'underpopulation' and contemporary German development aid stresses population growth to be the problem, this paper finds that racialised, gendered discourses are interconnected with the political economy of population control in both periods. It highlights that colonial power in development cooperation can only be fully comprehended by tracing the continuity of colonial discourses to material practices as well as economic interests of the Global North, and argues that critique of population politics should address population control in general - whether anti- or pro-natalist - as imbued with racism and serving the interests of capital. Such a perspective might allow us to be sensitive to possible future developments in population and reproductive health policy towards the Global South, in which antinatalist (regarding marginalised people) and pronatalist (regarding privileged people) policies run concurrently, as is the case in countries of the Global North today.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 The Institute of Postcolonial Studies 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Postcolonial studies</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2016), 1, Seite 53-18</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)240142209</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1412469-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090829557</subfield><subfield code="x">1368-8790</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:53-18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688790.2016.1228137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ASS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ANG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">53-18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397455 |