Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications

The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multin...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Guendelman, Sylvia [verfasserIn] Gemmill, Alison MacDonald, Leslie A

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC

Schlagwörter:	employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Ergonomics - London : Taylor & Francis, 1957, 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:59 ; year:2016 ; number:12 ; pages:1613-1624

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627

Katalog-ID:	OLC1987272188

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1987272188
003	DE-627
005	20220219172607.0
007	tu
008	170207s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20170301
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1987272188
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188
035			\|a (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780
035			\|a (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 650 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 44.12 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 85.52 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Guendelman, Sylvia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016
540			\|a © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC
650		4	\|a employment withdrawal during pregnancy
650		4	\|a psychological stress
650		4	\|a Health risks
650		4	\|a health and safety
650		4	\|a physical work capacity
650		4	\|a biomechanical job stressors
650		4	\|a strenuous work during pregnancy
650		4	\|a physical fatigue
650		4	\|a physical ergonomics
650		4	\|a Analysis
650		4	\|a Physiological aspects
650		4	\|a Job stress
650		4	\|a Pregnant women
650		4	\|a Employment
650		4	\|a Biomechanics
650		4	\|a Psychological aspects
650		4	\|a Occupational stress
650		4	\|a Fatigue
650		4	\|a Pregnancy
650		4	\|a Occupational health
650		4	\|a Occupational safety
700	1		\|a Gemmill, Alison \|4 oth
700	1		\|a MacDonald, Leslie A \|4 oth
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Ergonomics \|d London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 \|g 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 \|w (DE-627)129070637 \|w (DE-600)1920-3 \|w (DE-576)014402556 \|x 0014-0139 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:59 \|g year:2016 \|g number:12 \|g pages:1613-1624
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627
856	4	2	\|u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-SPO
912			\|a SSG-OPC-FOR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4314
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4598
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.12 \|q AVZ
936	b	k	\|a 85.52 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 59 \|j 2016 \|e 12 \|h 1613-1624

Indexfelder

author_variant	s g sg
matchkey_str	article:00140139:2016----::imcaiaadraiainltesradsoitosihmlyetihrwlmnpenn
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
bklnumber	44.12 85.52
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Guendelman, Sylvia verfasserin aut Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety Gemmill, Alison oth MacDonald, Leslie A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 59 2016 12 1613-1624
spelling	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Guendelman, Sylvia verfasserin aut Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety Gemmill, Alison oth MacDonald, Leslie A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 59 2016 12 1613-1624
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Guendelman, Sylvia verfasserin aut Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety Gemmill, Alison oth MacDonald, Leslie A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 59 2016 12 1613-1624
allfieldsGer	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Guendelman, Sylvia verfasserin aut Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety Gemmill, Alison oth MacDonald, Leslie A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 59 2016 12 1613-1624
allfieldsSound	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Guendelman, Sylvia verfasserin aut Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 © COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety Gemmill, Alison oth MacDonald, Leslie A oth Enthalten in Ergonomics London : Taylor & Francis, 1957 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 (DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556 0014-0139 nnns volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700 44.12 AVZ 85.52 AVZ AR 59 2016 12 1613-1624
language	English
source	Enthalten in Ergonomics 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624
sourceStr	Enthalten in Ergonomics 59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624 volume:59 year:2016 number:12 pages:1613-1624
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety
dewey-raw	650
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Ergonomics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Guendelman, Sylvia @@aut@@ Gemmill, Alison @@oth@@ MacDonald, Leslie A @@oth@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129070637
dewey-sort	3650
id	OLC1987272188
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1987272188</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172607.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1987272188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guendelman, Sylvia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">employment withdrawal during pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychological stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Health risks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health and safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical work capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biomechanical job stressors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">strenuous work during pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical fatigue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical ergonomics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Physiological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Job stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pregnant women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biomechanics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fatigue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gemmill, Alison</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MacDonald, Leslie A</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1613-1624</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1613-1624</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Guendelman, Sylvia
spellingShingle	Guendelman, Sylvia ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc employment withdrawal during pregnancy misc psychological stress misc Health risks misc health and safety misc physical work capacity misc biomechanical job stressors misc strenuous work during pregnancy misc physical fatigue misc physical ergonomics misc Analysis misc Physiological aspects misc Job stress misc Pregnant women misc Employment misc Biomechanics misc Psychological aspects misc Occupational stress misc Fatigue misc Pregnancy misc Occupational health misc Occupational safety Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
authorStr	Guendelman, Sylvia
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129070637
format	Article
dewey-ones	650 - Management & auxiliary services
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0014-0139
topic_title	650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications employment withdrawal during pregnancy psychological stress Health risks health and safety physical work capacity biomechanical job stressors strenuous work during pregnancy physical fatigue physical ergonomics Analysis Physiological aspects Job stress Pregnant women Employment Biomechanics Psychological aspects Occupational stress Fatigue Pregnancy Occupational health Occupational safety
topic	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc employment withdrawal during pregnancy misc psychological stress misc Health risks misc health and safety misc physical work capacity misc biomechanical job stressors misc strenuous work during pregnancy misc physical fatigue misc physical ergonomics misc Analysis misc Physiological aspects misc Job stress misc Pregnant women misc Employment misc Biomechanics misc Psychological aspects misc Occupational stress misc Fatigue misc Pregnancy misc Occupational health misc Occupational safety
topic_unstemmed	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc employment withdrawal during pregnancy misc psychological stress misc Health risks misc health and safety misc physical work capacity misc biomechanical job stressors misc strenuous work during pregnancy misc physical fatigue misc physical ergonomics misc Analysis misc Physiological aspects misc Job stress misc Pregnant women misc Employment misc Biomechanics misc Psychological aspects misc Occupational stress misc Fatigue misc Pregnancy misc Occupational health misc Occupational safety
topic_browse	ddc 650 bkl 44.12 bkl 85.52 misc employment withdrawal during pregnancy misc psychological stress misc Health risks misc health and safety misc physical work capacity misc biomechanical job stressors misc strenuous work during pregnancy misc physical fatigue misc physical ergonomics misc Analysis misc Physiological aspects misc Job stress misc Pregnant women misc Employment misc Biomechanics misc Psychological aspects misc Occupational stress misc Fatigue misc Pregnancy misc Occupational health misc Occupational safety
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
author2_variant	a g ag l a m la lam
hierarchy_parent_title	Ergonomics
hierarchy_parent_id	129070637
dewey-tens	650 - Management & public relations
hierarchy_top_title	Ergonomics
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129070637 (DE-600)1920-3 (DE-576)014402556
title	Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1987272188 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188 (PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780 (KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat
title_full	Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
author_sort	Guendelman, Sylvia
journal	Ergonomics
journalStr	Ergonomics
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1613
author_browse	Guendelman, Sylvia
container_volume	59
class	650 DE-600 44.12 bkl 85.52 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Guendelman, Sylvia
doi_str_mv	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627
dewey-full	650
title_sort	biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
title_auth	Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
abstract	The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.
abstractGer	The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.
abstract_unstemmed	The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4314 GBV_ILN_4598 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	12
title_short	Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513
remote_bool	false
author2	Gemmill, Alison MacDonald, Leslie A
author2Str	Gemmill, Alison MacDonald, Leslie A
ppnlink	129070637
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
author2_role	oth oth
doi_str	10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627
up_date	2024-07-03T13:18:33.716Z
_version_	1803564051299565568
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1987272188</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220219172607.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1987272188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1987272188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2499-fa9365725b2fc310a965eb8c1c5697d2a355d590afa38e500a044c1c0ce8c0780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0026984020160000059001201613biomechanicalandorganisationalstressorsandassociat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guendelman, Sylvia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The distribution of exposure to biomechanical and organisational job stressors (BOJS) and associations with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave, unemployment) was examined in a case-control study of 1114 pregnant workers in California. We performed descriptive and multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses. At pregnancy onset, 57% were exposed to one or more biomechanical stressors, including frequent bending, heavy lifting and prolonged standing. One-third were simultaneously exposed to BOJS. Exposure to biomechanical stressors declined as pregnancy progressed and cessation often (41%) coincided with employment withdrawal (antenatal leave and unemployment). In multivariate modelling, whether we adjusted for or considered organisational stressors as coincident exposures, results showed that pregnant workers exposed to biomechanical stressors had increased employment withdrawal compared to the unexposed. Work schedule accommodations moderate this association. Paid antenatal leave, available to few US women, was an important strategy for mitigating exposure to BOJS. Implications for science and policy are discussed. Practitioner Summary: This case-control study showed that exposure to biomechanical stressors decline throughout pregnancy. Antenatal leave was an important strategy used for mitigating exposure among sampled California women with access to paid benefits. Employment withdrawal among workers exposed to BJOS may be reduced by proactive administrative and engineering efforts applied early in pregnancy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Taylor & Francis Group LLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">employment withdrawal during pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychological stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Health risks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health and safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical work capacity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biomechanical job stressors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">strenuous work during pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical fatigue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">physical ergonomics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Physiological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Job stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pregnant women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biomechanics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fatigue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pregnancy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Occupational safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gemmill, Alison</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MacDonald, Leslie A</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1957</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2016), 12, Seite 1613-1624</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129070637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1920-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014402556</subfield><subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1613-1624</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2016.1157627</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1840794513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.12</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.52</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1613-1624</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400032

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Biomechanical and organisational stressors and associations with employment withdrawal among pregnant workers: evidence and implications

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?