The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi
In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Williams, John R [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Philosophy east and west - Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951, 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:67 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:177 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1987793854 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1987793854 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220216065034.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170206 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1987793854 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |a 890 |a 290 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a PHILOS |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 08.10 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Williams, John R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Criticism and interpretation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agnosticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Problems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophy east and west |d Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 |g 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 |w (DE-627)129083216 |w (DE-600)3890-8 |w (DE-576)014416468 |x 0031-8221 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:177 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHILOS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SAS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-OAS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MFO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-VOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4314 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 08.10 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 67 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 177 | ||
| author_variant |
j r w jr jrw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00318221:2017----::hvnsigidadhlegsnipiain |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
08.10 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl Williams, John R verfasserin aut The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy Enthalten in Philosophy east and west Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 (DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 0031-8221 nnns volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 08.10 AVZ AR 67 2017 1 177 |
| spelling |
PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl Williams, John R verfasserin aut The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy Enthalten in Philosophy east and west Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 (DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 0031-8221 nnns volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 08.10 AVZ AR 67 2017 1 177 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl Williams, John R verfasserin aut The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy Enthalten in Philosophy east and west Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 (DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 0031-8221 nnns volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 08.10 AVZ AR 67 2017 1 177 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl Williams, John R verfasserin aut The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy Enthalten in Philosophy east and west Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 (DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 0031-8221 nnns volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 08.10 AVZ AR 67 2017 1 177 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20170206 (DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl Williams, John R verfasserin aut The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy Enthalten in Philosophy east and west Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 (DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 0031-8221 nnns volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 08.10 AVZ AR 67 2017 1 177 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Philosophy east and west 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Philosophy east and west 67(2017), 1, Seite 177 volume:67 year:2017 number:1 pages:177 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Philosophy east and west |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Williams, John R @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129083216 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC1987793854 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1987793854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216065034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1987793854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">890</subfield><subfield code="a">290</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">08.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, John R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agnosticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Problems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophy east and west</subfield><subfield code="d">Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2017), 1, Seite 177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129083216</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3890-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014416468</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8221</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">08.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Williams, John R |
| spellingShingle |
Williams, John R ddc 100 fid PHILOS bkl 08.10 misc Criticism and interpretation misc Agnosticism misc Philosophers misc Analysis misc Problems misc Epistemology misc Philosophy The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| authorStr |
Williams, John R |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129083216 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 890 - Literatures of other languages 290 - Other religions |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0031-8221 |
| topic_title |
100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi Criticism and interpretation Agnosticism Philosophers Analysis Problems Epistemology Philosophy |
| topic |
ddc 100 fid PHILOS bkl 08.10 misc Criticism and interpretation misc Agnosticism misc Philosophers misc Analysis misc Problems misc Epistemology misc Philosophy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 fid PHILOS bkl 08.10 misc Criticism and interpretation misc Agnosticism misc Philosophers misc Analysis misc Problems misc Epistemology misc Philosophy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 fid PHILOS bkl 08.10 misc Criticism and interpretation misc Agnosticism misc Philosophers misc Analysis misc Problems misc Epistemology misc Philosophy |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Philosophy east and west |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129083216 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 890 - Other literatures 290 - Other religions |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Philosophy east and west |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129083216 (DE-600)3890-8 (DE-576)014416468 |
| title |
The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1987793854 (DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854 (PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0 (KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory |
| title_full |
The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| author_sort |
Williams, John R |
| journal |
Philosophy east and west |
| journalStr |
Philosophy east and west |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 800 - Literature 200 - Religion |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
177 |
| author_browse |
Williams, John R |
| container_volume |
67 |
| class |
100 890 290 DE-600 PHILOS fid 08.10 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Williams, John R |
| dewey-full |
100 890 290 |
| title_sort |
vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of ziporyn's zhuangzi |
| title_auth |
The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| abstract |
In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. |
| abstractGer |
In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SAS SSG-OLC-OAS SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-MFO SSG-OPC-VOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4314 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129083216 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:20:57.420Z |
| _version_ |
1803571751730282496 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1987793854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216065034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1987793854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1987793854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g755-7d5e85df33e7e7a2669ff6b69fef30935c4fe7367adfd6750e6f42489979943c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0055647520170000067000100177vanishingwildcardchallengesandimplicationsofzipory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">890</subfield><subfield code="a">290</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">08.10</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, John R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The vanishing wild card: challenges and implications of Ziporyn's Zhuangzi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this essay, Brook Ziporyn's reading of Zhuangzi is explicated and broken down into what the author takes to be its two primary parts: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism, and second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card. The former presents a unique set of philosophical problems through the specialized terminology of the classical Chinese lexicon, while the latter tries to remedy these problems. In carrying out this project, the present essay adopts the following structure: first, Zhuangzi's epistemological agnosticism and perspectivism is clarified and expanded upon in terms most accessible to a certain kind of philosopher; second, Zhuangzi's Wild Card is explicated; and lastly, the Wild Card's ability to resolve problems that, by their very structure, demand fixed solutions is problematized. Moreover, they may be forced to reconsider the grammar of some of their most commonplace questions. If section II of this article is not convincing, one should still see the ramifications of Ziporyn's position, given its veracity, thereby clarifying the stakes of the dispute.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agnosticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Problems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophy east and west</subfield><subfield code="d">Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1951</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2017), 1, Seite 177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129083216</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3890-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014416468</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8221</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1850345626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OAS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">08.10</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397958 |