Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry
We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expen...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Anderson, Simon P [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The Rand journal of economics - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984, 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:47 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; pages:1029-1056 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1988203473 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1988203473 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230516022805.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170207s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1756-2171.12162 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170501 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1988203473 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |a 300 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 83.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Anderson, Simon P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. | ||
540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Advertising | |
650 | 4 | |a Automobile industry | |
650 | 4 | |a Brand image | |
650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Nonprescription drugs | |
650 | 4 | |a Perceptions | |
650 | 4 | |a Equilibrium | |
650 | 4 | |a Advertisements | |
650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Analgesics | |
700 | 1 | |a Ciliberto, Federico |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Liaukonyte, Jura |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Renault, Régis |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Rand journal of economics |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 |g 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 |w (DE-627)130630128 |w (DE-600)798131-4 |w (DE-576)016135814 |x 0741-6261 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:1029-1056 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2174 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 83.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 47 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 1029-1056 |
author_variant |
s p a sp spa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:07416261:2016----::uheulocmaaiedetsniteta |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
bklnumber |
83.00 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 doi PQ20170501 (DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Anderson, Simon P verfasserin aut Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics Ciliberto, Federico oth Liaukonyte, Jura oth Renault, Régis oth Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 (DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 0741-6261 nnns volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 83.00 AVZ AR 47 2016 4 1029-1056 |
spelling |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 doi PQ20170501 (DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Anderson, Simon P verfasserin aut Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics Ciliberto, Federico oth Liaukonyte, Jura oth Renault, Régis oth Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 (DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 0741-6261 nnns volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 83.00 AVZ AR 47 2016 4 1029-1056 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 doi PQ20170501 (DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Anderson, Simon P verfasserin aut Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics Ciliberto, Federico oth Liaukonyte, Jura oth Renault, Régis oth Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 (DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 0741-6261 nnns volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 83.00 AVZ AR 47 2016 4 1029-1056 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 doi PQ20170501 (DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Anderson, Simon P verfasserin aut Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics Ciliberto, Federico oth Liaukonyte, Jura oth Renault, Régis oth Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 (DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 0741-6261 nnns volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 83.00 AVZ AR 47 2016 4 1029-1056 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 doi PQ20170501 (DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Anderson, Simon P verfasserin aut Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation. © COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation. Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics Ciliberto, Federico oth Liaukonyte, Jura oth Renault, Régis oth Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 (DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 0741-6261 nnns volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 83.00 AVZ AR 47 2016 4 1029-1056 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in The Rand journal of economics 47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056 volume:47 year:2016 number:4 pages:1029-1056 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
The Rand journal of economics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Anderson, Simon P @@aut@@ Ciliberto, Federico @@oth@@ Liaukonyte, Jura @@oth@@ Renault, Régis @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130630128 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
OLC1988203473 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1988203473</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230516022805.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1756-2171.12162</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170501</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1988203473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anderson, Simon P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advertising</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Automobile industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brand image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nonprescription drugs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Equilibrium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advertisements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analgesics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciliberto, Federico</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liaukonyte, Jura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renault, Régis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Rand journal of economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130630128</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)798131-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016135814</subfield><subfield code="x">0741-6261</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1029-1056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">1029-1056</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Anderson, Simon P |
spellingShingle |
Anderson, Simon P ddc 330 bkl 83.00 misc Advertising misc Automobile industry misc Brand image misc Analysis misc Nonprescription drugs misc Perceptions misc Equilibrium misc Advertisements misc Studies misc Analgesics Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
authorStr |
Anderson, Simon P |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130630128 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 300 - Social sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0741-6261 |
topic_title |
330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry Advertising Automobile industry Brand image Analysis Nonprescription drugs Perceptions Equilibrium Advertisements Studies Analgesics |
topic |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 misc Advertising misc Automobile industry misc Brand image misc Analysis misc Nonprescription drugs misc Perceptions misc Equilibrium misc Advertisements misc Studies misc Analgesics |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 misc Advertising misc Automobile industry misc Brand image misc Analysis misc Nonprescription drugs misc Perceptions misc Equilibrium misc Advertisements misc Studies misc Analgesics |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 bkl 83.00 misc Advertising misc Automobile industry misc Brand image misc Analysis misc Nonprescription drugs misc Perceptions misc Equilibrium misc Advertisements misc Studies misc Analgesics |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
f c fc j l jl r r rr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
The Rand journal of economics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130630128 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
hierarchy_top_title |
The Rand journal of economics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130630128 (DE-600)798131-4 (DE-576)016135814 |
title |
Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1988203473 (DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473 (PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0 (KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges |
title_full |
Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
author_sort |
Anderson, Simon P |
journal |
The Rand journal of economics |
journalStr |
The Rand journal of economics |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1029 |
author_browse |
Anderson, Simon P |
container_volume |
47 |
class |
330 300 DE-600 83.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Anderson, Simon P |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 |
dewey-full |
330 300 |
title_sort |
push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the otc analgesics industry |
title_auth |
Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
abstract |
We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. |
abstractGer |
We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. |
abstract_unstemmed |
We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_2174 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Ciliberto, Federico Liaukonyte, Jura Renault, Régis |
author2Str |
Ciliberto, Federico Liaukonyte, Jura Renault, Régis |
ppnlink |
130630128 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1111/1756-2171.12162 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:58:45.286Z |
_version_ |
1803577904633741312 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1988203473</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230516022805.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1756-2171.12162</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170501</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1988203473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1988203473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g2162-2690ead6ff57a027b29eca5232470152983b284667335783cb11f183470343dc0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0078130420160000047000401029pushmepullyoucomparativeadvertisingintheotcanalges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anderson, Simon P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Push‐me pull‐you: comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We derive equilibrium incentives to use comparative advertising that pushes up own brand perception and pulls down the brand image of targeted rivals. Data on content and spending for all TV advertisements in Over‐The‐ Counter (OTC) analgesics enable us to construct matrices of rival targeting expenditures and estimate the structural model. Using brands' optimal choices, these attack matrices identify diversion ratios, from which we derive comparative advertising damage measures. We find that comparative advertising causes more damage to the targeted rival than benefit to the advertiser. We simulate banning comparative advertising to find industry profits rise.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016, The RAND Corporation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2016 Published on behalf of the RAND Corporation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advertising</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Automobile industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brand image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nonprescription drugs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Equilibrium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advertisements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analgesics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciliberto, Federico</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liaukonyte, Jura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Renault, Régis</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Rand journal of economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2016), 4, Seite 1029-1056</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130630128</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)798131-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016135814</subfield><subfield code="x">0741-6261</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1029-1056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12162</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-2171.12162/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1843761623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">1029-1056</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4009523 |