Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework”
Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, b...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
De Witt, Annick [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
science attitudes and perceptions |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Public understanding of science - London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992, 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:70-88 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1177/0963662515592364 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1989367097 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1989367097 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230518124149.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0963662515592364 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170301 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1989367097 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 500 |q ZDB |
084 | |a 30.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a De Witt, Annick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 | ||
650 | 4 | |a biotechnology | |
650 | 4 | |a GM food | |
650 | 4 | |a science attitudes and perceptions | |
650 | 4 | |a risk attitudes | |
650 | 4 | |a public understanding of science | |
650 | 4 | |a ethics | |
700 | 1 | |a Osseweijer, Patricia |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pierce, Robin |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Public understanding of science |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 |g 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 |w (DE-627)12911281X |w (DE-600)33479-0 |w (DE-576)04307233X |x 0963-6625 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:70-88 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_179 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 30.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 26 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 70-88 |
author_variant |
w a d wa wad |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09636625:2017----::nesadnpbipretosfitcnlgtruhhitga |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
bklnumber |
30.00 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1177/0963662515592364 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 500 ZDB 30.00 bkl De Witt, Annick verfasserin aut Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics Osseweijer, Patricia oth Pierce, Robin oth Enthalten in Public understanding of science London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 (DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X 0963-6625 nnns volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 30.00 AVZ AR 26 2017 1 70-88 |
spelling |
10.1177/0963662515592364 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 500 ZDB 30.00 bkl De Witt, Annick verfasserin aut Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics Osseweijer, Patricia oth Pierce, Robin oth Enthalten in Public understanding of science London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 (DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X 0963-6625 nnns volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 30.00 AVZ AR 26 2017 1 70-88 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1177/0963662515592364 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 500 ZDB 30.00 bkl De Witt, Annick verfasserin aut Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics Osseweijer, Patricia oth Pierce, Robin oth Enthalten in Public understanding of science London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 (DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X 0963-6625 nnns volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 30.00 AVZ AR 26 2017 1 70-88 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1177/0963662515592364 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 500 ZDB 30.00 bkl De Witt, Annick verfasserin aut Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics Osseweijer, Patricia oth Pierce, Robin oth Enthalten in Public understanding of science London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 (DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X 0963-6625 nnns volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 30.00 AVZ AR 26 2017 1 70-88 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1177/0963662515592364 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 500 ZDB 30.00 bkl De Witt, Annick verfasserin aut Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015 biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics Osseweijer, Patricia oth Pierce, Robin oth Enthalten in Public understanding of science London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 (DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X 0963-6625 nnns volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 30.00 AVZ AR 26 2017 1 70-88 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Public understanding of science 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Public understanding of science 26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88 volume:26 year:2017 number:1 pages:70-88 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics |
dewey-raw |
500 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Public understanding of science |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
De Witt, Annick @@aut@@ Osseweijer, Patricia @@oth@@ Pierce, Robin @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
12911281X |
dewey-sort |
3500 |
id |
OLC1989367097 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1989367097</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518124149.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1989367097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">30.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Witt, Annick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GM food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">science attitudes and perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public understanding of science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osseweijer, Patricia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierce, Robin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public understanding of science</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12911281X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)33479-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)04307233X</subfield><subfield code="x">0963-6625</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:70-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">30.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">70-88</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
De Witt, Annick |
spellingShingle |
De Witt, Annick ddc 500 bkl 30.00 misc biotechnology misc GM food misc science attitudes and perceptions misc risk attitudes misc public understanding of science misc ethics Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
authorStr |
De Witt, Annick |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)12911281X |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
500 - Natural sciences & mathematics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0963-6625 |
topic_title |
500 ZDB 30.00 bkl Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” biotechnology GM food science attitudes and perceptions risk attitudes public understanding of science ethics |
topic |
ddc 500 bkl 30.00 misc biotechnology misc GM food misc science attitudes and perceptions misc risk attitudes misc public understanding of science misc ethics |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 500 bkl 30.00 misc biotechnology misc GM food misc science attitudes and perceptions misc risk attitudes misc public understanding of science misc ethics |
topic_browse |
ddc 500 bkl 30.00 misc biotechnology misc GM food misc science attitudes and perceptions misc risk attitudes misc public understanding of science misc ethics |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
p o po r p rp |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Public understanding of science |
hierarchy_parent_id |
12911281X |
dewey-tens |
500 - Science |
hierarchy_top_title |
Public understanding of science |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)12911281X (DE-600)33479-0 (DE-576)04307233X |
title |
Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1989367097 (DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097 (PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0 (KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou |
title_full |
Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
author_sort |
De Witt, Annick |
journal |
Public understanding of science |
journalStr |
Public understanding of science |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
70 |
author_browse |
De Witt, Annick |
container_volume |
26 |
class |
500 ZDB 30.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
De Witt, Annick |
doi_str_mv |
10.1177/0963662515592364 |
dewey-full |
500 |
title_sort |
understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “integrative worldview framework” |
title_auth |
Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
abstract |
Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. |
abstractGer |
Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_179 GBV_ILN_4012 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework” |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Osseweijer, Patricia Pierce, Robin |
author2Str |
Osseweijer, Patricia Pierce, Robin |
ppnlink |
12911281X |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1177/0963662515592364 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:18:10.843Z |
_version_ |
1803594226310578176 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1989367097</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518124149.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1989367097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1989367097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1890-dfbec8dcb0840f9830ef75be928bab3d7ddd5e8548e8f6e5b44437be5ff2323b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0214551020170000026000100070understandingpublicperceptionsofbiotechnologythrou</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">30.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Witt, Annick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “Integrative Worldview Framework”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biotechnological innovations prompt a range of societal responses that demand understanding. Research has shown such responses are shaped by individuals’ cultural worldviews. We aim to demonstrate how the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) can be used for analyzing perceptions of biotechnology, by reviewing (1) research on public perceptions of biotechnology and (2) analyses of the stakeholder-debate on the bio-based economy, using the Integrative Worldview Framework (IWF) as analytical lens. This framework operationalizes the concept of worldview and distinguishes between traditional, modern, and postmodern worldviews, among others. Applied to these literatures, this framework illuminates how these worldviews underlie major societal responses, thereby providing a unifying understanding of the literature on perceptions of biotechnology. We conclude the IWF has relevance for informing research on perceptions of socio-technical changes, generating insight into the paradigmatic gaps in social science, and facilitating reflexive and inclusive policy-making and debates on these timely issues.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GM food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">science attitudes and perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public understanding of science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osseweijer, Patricia</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierce, Robin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public understanding of science</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2017), 1, Seite 70-88</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)12911281X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)33479-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)04307233X</subfield><subfield code="x">0963-6625</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:70-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963662515592364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1852396887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">30.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">70-88</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400528 |