Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation
Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Whitehouse, Alexander [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Landscape research - Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976, 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:42 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:230-234 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1991258372 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1991258372 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230715034058.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170303s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170301 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1991258372 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 910 |a 940 |q DE-600 |
100 | 1 | |a Whitehouse, Alexander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Green infrastructure | |
650 | 4 | |a valuation toolkit | |
650 | 4 | |a additionality | |
650 | 4 | |a double counting | |
650 | 4 | |a environmental valuation | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Landscape research |d Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 |g 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 |w (DE-627)130565881 |w (DE-600)787249-5 |w (DE-576)453264212 |x 0142-6397 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:230-234 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 42 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 230-234 |
author_variant |
a w aw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:01426397:2017----::omncnmcvrihsnreifat |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 940 DE-600 Whitehouse, Alexander verfasserin aut Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation Enthalten in Landscape research Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 (DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 0142-6397 nnns volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2017 2 230-234 |
spelling |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 940 DE-600 Whitehouse, Alexander verfasserin aut Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation Enthalten in Landscape research Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 (DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 0142-6397 nnns volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2017 2 230-234 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 940 DE-600 Whitehouse, Alexander verfasserin aut Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation Enthalten in Landscape research Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 (DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 0142-6397 nnns volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2017 2 230-234 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 940 DE-600 Whitehouse, Alexander verfasserin aut Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation Enthalten in Landscape research Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 (DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 0142-6397 nnns volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2017 2 230-234 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 doi PQ20170301 (DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 910 940 DE-600 Whitehouse, Alexander verfasserin aut Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016 Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation Enthalten in Landscape research Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 (DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 0142-6397 nnns volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 AR 42 2017 2 230-234 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Landscape research 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Landscape research 42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234 volume:42 year:2017 number:2 pages:230-234 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Landscape research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Whitehouse, Alexander @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130565881 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC1991258372 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1991258372</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715034058.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170303s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1991258372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="a">940</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitehouse, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Green infrastructure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">valuation toolkit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">additionality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">double counting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">environmental valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Landscape research</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130565881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)787249-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)453264212</subfield><subfield code="x">0142-6397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:230-234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">230-234</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Whitehouse, Alexander |
spellingShingle |
Whitehouse, Alexander ddc 570 misc Green infrastructure misc valuation toolkit misc additionality misc double counting misc environmental valuation Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
authorStr |
Whitehouse, Alexander |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130565881 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 910 - Geography & travel 940 - History of Europe |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0142-6397 |
topic_title |
570 910 940 DE-600 Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation Green infrastructure valuation toolkit additionality double counting environmental valuation |
topic |
ddc 570 misc Green infrastructure misc valuation toolkit misc additionality misc double counting misc environmental valuation |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 misc Green infrastructure misc valuation toolkit misc additionality misc double counting misc environmental valuation |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 misc Green infrastructure misc valuation toolkit misc additionality misc double counting misc environmental valuation |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Landscape research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130565881 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 910 - Geography & travel 940 - History of Europe |
hierarchy_top_title |
Landscape research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130565881 (DE-600)787249-5 (DE-576)453264212 |
title |
Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1991258372 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372 (PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940 (KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua |
title_full |
Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
author_sort |
Whitehouse, Alexander |
journal |
Landscape research |
journalStr |
Landscape research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 900 - History & geography |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
230 |
author_browse |
Whitehouse, Alexander |
container_volume |
42 |
class |
570 910 940 DE-600 |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Whitehouse, Alexander |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |
dewey-full |
570 910 940 |
title_sort |
common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
title_auth |
Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
abstract |
Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. |
abstractGer |
Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
130565881 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:48:51.672Z |
_version_ |
1803615030928736256 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1991258372</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715034058.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170303s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1991258372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1991258372</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1264-60b5a181893b0797fa276803947597c0624618adeca42699e4764df65708fe940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0202155220170000042000200230commoneconomicoversightsingreeninfrastructurevalua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">910</subfield><subfield code="a">940</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitehouse, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common economic oversights in green infrastructure valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valuation toolkits are supposed to make the valuation of green infrastructure benefits a more simple and accessible task, but there are many barriers which stand in the way of them achieving this. This paper discusses some common economic oversights, associated with double counting, distinct types of value and additionality, which valuation toolkits must avoid to ensure their output is dependable. From this discussion, guidance emerges to help users of valuation toolkits interpret valuation estimates in a meaningful way, and it is concluded that with a good awareness of environmental economic principles, the majority of common issues can be avoided. This conclusion, however, raises the question as to just how accessible a process as complex as green infrastructure valuation can be made to be and places emphasis on the role of toolkit developers who must endeavour to remove as much ambiguity as possible from their methodologies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Landscape Research Group Ltd 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Green infrastructure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">valuation toolkit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">additionality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">double counting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">environmental valuation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Landscape research</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford, West Yorkshire : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">42(2017), 2, Seite 230-234</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130565881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)787249-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)453264212</subfield><subfield code="x">0142-6397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:42</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:230-234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2016.1228860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">42</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">230-234</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401041 |