What's wrong with human extinction?

This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2017

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Schlagwörter:	intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Canadian journal of philosophy - New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971, 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:47 ; year:2017 ; number:2-3 ; pages:327

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150

Katalog-ID:	OLC1991828608

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1991828608
003	DE-627
005	20220215140443.0
007	tu
008	170512s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20170901
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1991828608
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608
035			\|a (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0
035			\|a (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 100 \|q DNB
084			\|a PHILOS \|2 fid
100	1		\|a Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a What's wrong with human extinction?
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017
650		4	\|a intergenerational ethics
650		4	\|a contractualism
650		4	\|a population size
650		4	\|a T.M. Scanlon
650		4	\|a Human extinction
650		4	\|a Extinction
650		4	\|a Ethics
650		4	\|a Philosophy
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Canadian journal of philosophy \|d New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 \|g 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 \|w (DE-627)166707600 \|w (DE-600)280552-2 \|w (DE-576)015151999 \|x 0045-5091 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:47 \|g year:2017 \|g number:2-3 \|g pages:327
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150
856	4	2	\|u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-PHILOS
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHI
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_72
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4027
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 47 \|j 2017 \|e 2-3 \|h 327

Indexfelder

author_variant	e f b efb
matchkey_str	article:00455091:2017----::htwogihuae
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth verfasserin aut What's wrong with human extinction? 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017 intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 (DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999 0045-5091 nnns volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 AR 47 2017 2-3 327
spelling	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth verfasserin aut What's wrong with human extinction? 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017 intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 (DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999 0045-5091 nnns volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 AR 47 2017 2-3 327
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth verfasserin aut What's wrong with human extinction? 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017 intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 (DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999 0045-5091 nnns volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 AR 47 2017 2-3 327
allfieldsGer	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth verfasserin aut What's wrong with human extinction? 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017 intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 (DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999 0045-5091 nnns volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 AR 47 2017 2-3 327
allfieldsSound	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 DNB PHILOS fid Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth verfasserin aut What's wrong with human extinction? 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017 intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 (DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999 0045-5091 nnns volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 AR 47 2017 2-3 327
language	English
source	Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327
sourceStr	Enthalten in Canadian journal of philosophy 47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327 volume:47 year:2017 number:2-3 pages:327
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy
dewey-raw	100
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Canadian journal of philosophy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	166707600
dewey-sort	3100
id	OLC1991828608
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1991828608</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215140443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1991828608</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What's wrong with human extinction?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intergenerational ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contractualism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">population size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">T.M. Scanlon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human extinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Extinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Canadian journal of philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166707600</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)280552-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015151999</subfield><subfield code="x">0045-5091</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:327</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">327</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth
spellingShingle	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth ddc 100 fid PHILOS misc intergenerational ethics misc contractualism misc population size misc T.M. Scanlon misc Human extinction misc Extinction misc Ethics misc Philosophy What's wrong with human extinction?
authorStr	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)166707600
format	Article
dewey-ones	100 - Philosophy & psychology
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0045-5091
topic_title	100 DNB PHILOS fid What's wrong with human extinction? intergenerational ethics contractualism population size T.M. Scanlon Human extinction Extinction Ethics Philosophy
topic	ddc 100 fid PHILOS misc intergenerational ethics misc contractualism misc population size misc T.M. Scanlon misc Human extinction misc Extinction misc Ethics misc Philosophy
topic_unstemmed	ddc 100 fid PHILOS misc intergenerational ethics misc contractualism misc population size misc T.M. Scanlon misc Human extinction misc Extinction misc Ethics misc Philosophy
topic_browse	ddc 100 fid PHILOS misc intergenerational ethics misc contractualism misc population size misc T.M. Scanlon misc Human extinction misc Extinction misc Ethics misc Philosophy
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Canadian journal of philosophy
hierarchy_parent_id	166707600
dewey-tens	100 - Philosophy
hierarchy_top_title	Canadian journal of philosophy
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)166707600 (DE-600)280552-2 (DE-576)015151999
title	What's wrong with human extinction?
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1991828608 (DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608 (PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0 (KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction
title_full	What's wrong with human extinction?
author_sort	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth
journal	Canadian journal of philosophy
journalStr	Canadian journal of philosophy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	100 - Philosophy & psychology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	327
author_browse	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth
container_volume	47
class	100 DNB PHILOS fid
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth
doi_str_mv	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150
dewey-full	100
title_sort	what's wrong with human extinction?
title_auth	What's wrong with human extinction?
abstract	This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.
abstractGer	This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.
abstract_unstemmed	This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027
container_issue	2-3
title_short	What's wrong with human extinction?
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	166707600
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150
up_date	2024-07-04T03:42:49.113Z
_version_	1803618425624330240
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1991828608</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215140443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1991828608</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1991828608</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1789-19b85cfcbd0df01ac4f39b9fdd6dc0c3b6e7ebe0d8c4fcda74ca006aaf0bc3a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0003907120170000047000200327whatswrongwithhumanextinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What's wrong with human extinction?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper explores what could be wrong with the fact of human extinction. I first present four reasons why we might consider human extinction to be wrong: (1) it would prevent millions of people from being born; (2) it would mean the loss of rational life and civilization; (3) it would cause existing people to suffer pain or death; (4) it would involve various psychological traumas. I argue that looking at the question from a contractualist perspective, only reasons (3) and (4) are admissible. I then consider what implications this limitation on reasons has for the wrongfulness of various forms of human extinction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intergenerational ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contractualism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">population size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">T.M. Scanlon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human extinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Extinction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Canadian journal of philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2017), 2-3, Seite 327</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166707600</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)280552-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015151999</subfield><subfield code="x">0045-5091</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:327</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883152917</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">327</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3978233

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

What's wrong with human extinction?

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?