Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models
What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commerc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The journal of peasant studies - Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973, 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:44 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; pages:555 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1992596417 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1992596417 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215170201.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170901 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1992596417 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |a 640 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 71.99 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 83.66 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hakizimana, Cyriaque |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a economic linkages | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kenya | |
| 650 | 4 | |a livelihoods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a land | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meru County | |
| 650 | 4 | |a labour | |
| 650 | 4 | |a agricultural commercialisations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agriculture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Farmers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Farms | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goldsmith, Paul |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nunow, Abdi Aralle |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roba, Adano Wario |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Biashara, Jane Kathure |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of peasant studies |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 |g 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 |w (DE-627)129095974 |w (DE-600)7568-1 |w (DE-576)014432242 |x 0306-6150 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:555 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-VOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_283 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2024 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.99 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 83.66 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 44 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 555 | ||
| author_variant |
c h ch |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:03066150:2017----::adnarcluacmecaiainneuonyeyei |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
71.99 83.66 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Hakizimana, Cyriaque verfasserin aut Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms Goldsmith, Paul oth Nunow, Abdi Aralle oth Roba, Adano Wario oth Biashara, Jane Kathure oth Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 (DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 0306-6150 nnns volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 71.99 AVZ 83.66 AVZ AR 44 2017 3 555 |
| spelling |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Hakizimana, Cyriaque verfasserin aut Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms Goldsmith, Paul oth Nunow, Abdi Aralle oth Roba, Adano Wario oth Biashara, Jane Kathure oth Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 (DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 0306-6150 nnns volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 71.99 AVZ 83.66 AVZ AR 44 2017 3 555 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Hakizimana, Cyriaque verfasserin aut Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms Goldsmith, Paul oth Nunow, Abdi Aralle oth Roba, Adano Wario oth Biashara, Jane Kathure oth Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 (DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 0306-6150 nnns volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 71.99 AVZ 83.66 AVZ AR 44 2017 3 555 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Hakizimana, Cyriaque verfasserin aut Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms Goldsmith, Paul oth Nunow, Abdi Aralle oth Roba, Adano Wario oth Biashara, Jane Kathure oth Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 (DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 0306-6150 nnns volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 71.99 AVZ 83.66 AVZ AR 44 2017 3 555 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Hakizimana, Cyriaque verfasserin aut Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms Goldsmith, Paul oth Nunow, Abdi Aralle oth Roba, Adano Wario oth Biashara, Jane Kathure oth Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 (DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 0306-6150 nnns volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 71.99 AVZ 83.66 AVZ AR 44 2017 3 555 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The journal of peasant studies 44(2017), 3, Seite 555 volume:44 year:2017 number:3 pages:555 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of peasant studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque @@aut@@ Goldsmith, Paul @@oth@@ Nunow, Abdi Aralle @@oth@@ Roba, Adano Wario @@oth@@ Biashara, Jane Kathure @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129095974 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
OLC1992596417 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1992596417</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215170201.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1992596417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.99</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.66</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakizimana, Cyriaque</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">economic linkages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kenya</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">livelihoods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">land</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meru County</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural commercialisations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farmers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldsmith, Paul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nunow, Abdi Aralle</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roba, Adano Wario</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biashara, Jane Kathure</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of peasant studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">44(2017), 3, Seite 555</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129095974</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7568-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014432242</subfield><subfield code="x">0306-6150</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.99</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.66</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">555</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque |
| spellingShingle |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque ddc 630 bkl 71.99 bkl 83.66 misc economic linkages misc Kenya misc livelihoods misc land misc Meru County misc labour misc agricultural commercialisations misc Agriculture misc Farmers misc Farms Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| authorStr |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129095974 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0306-6150 |
| topic_title |
630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models economic linkages Kenya livelihoods land Meru County labour agricultural commercialisations Agriculture Farmers Farms |
| topic |
ddc 630 bkl 71.99 bkl 83.66 misc economic linkages misc Kenya misc livelihoods misc land misc Meru County misc labour misc agricultural commercialisations misc Agriculture misc Farmers misc Farms |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 bkl 71.99 bkl 83.66 misc economic linkages misc Kenya misc livelihoods misc land misc Meru County misc labour misc agricultural commercialisations misc Agriculture misc Farmers misc Farms |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 bkl 71.99 bkl 83.66 misc economic linkages misc Kenya misc livelihoods misc land misc Meru County misc labour misc agricultural commercialisations misc Agriculture misc Farmers misc Farms |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
p g pg a a n aa aan a w r aw awr j k b jk jkb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of peasant studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129095974 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of peasant studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129095974 (DE-600)7568-1 (DE-576)014432242 |
| title |
Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1992596417 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417 (PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430 (KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke |
| title_full |
Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| author_sort |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque |
| journal |
The journal of peasant studies |
| journalStr |
The journal of peasant studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
555 |
| author_browse |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque |
| container_volume |
44 |
| class |
630 640 DNB 71.99 bkl 83.66 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hakizimana, Cyriaque |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 |
| title_sort |
land and agricultural commercialisation in meru county, kenya: evidence from three models |
| title_auth |
Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| abstract |
What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. |
| abstractGer |
What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OPC-VOR SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_283 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Goldsmith, Paul Nunow, Abdi Aralle Roba, Adano Wario Biashara, Jane Kathure |
| author2Str |
Goldsmith, Paul Nunow, Abdi Aralle Roba, Adano Wario Biashara, Jane Kathure |
| ppnlink |
129095974 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:16:59.500Z |
| _version_ |
1803624350477189120 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1992596417</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215170201.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1992596417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1992596417</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i2073-d736a4d32297b7435ea0d29368c4d0b20fe3cd799ec28b245081d2774a43ab430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0077134120170000044000300555landandagriculturalcommercialisationinmerucountyke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.99</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.66</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakizimana, Cyriaque</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Land and agricultural commercialisation in Meru County, Kenya: evidence from three models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What are the relative pros and cons of different pathways of agricultural commercialisation in Africa? This paper examines aspects of three commercial farming cases, each of which represents one of the three most dominant models of commercial agriculture - small-scale outgrowers, medium-size commercial farms and a large estate - in the high-potential area of Meru County in Kenya. The paper provides a comparative perspective across the cases, examining their outcomes in terms of land relations, labour, livelihoods and local economic linkages. The study used a mixed-methods approach, including a household survey and a range of qualitative methods including detailed life histories. We find diverse dynamics across our cases: increasing land consolidation spurred by the rising class of commercial coffee farmers, but also land fragmentation as a result of population pressure and prevalence of inheritance as a pathway to land acquisition in the case of horticultural outgrowers. The plantation generates relatively better paid employment for permanent skilled workers, while the commercial farms create employment for casualised, insecure and poorly paid seasonal labour. These labour regimes are highly gendered. The outgrowers combine family and hired labour. Across the three cases, farmers diversify income between on-farm and off-farm sources. The commercial and outgrower farms are dynamically integrated into the local economy, while the estate is less so. These features of the three models generate processes of social differentiation, which are reshaping the agrarian structure and rural economy in Meru County.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">economic linkages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kenya</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">livelihoods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">land</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meru County</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural commercialisations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farmers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Farms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldsmith, Paul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nunow, Abdi Aralle</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roba, Adano Wario</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biashara, Jane Kathure</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of peasant studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">44(2017), 3, Seite 555</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129095974</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7568-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014432242</subfield><subfield code="x">0306-6150</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:44</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2016.1260555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883142745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-VOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.99</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.66</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">44</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">555</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398137 |