Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers
In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Chen, Jing‐Huan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of applied polymer science - Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959, 134(2017), 22 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:134 ; year:2017 ; number:22 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1002/app.44880 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1992854521 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1992854521 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230518172911.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/app.44880 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171125 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1992854521 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 35.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 51.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chen, Jing‐Huan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a regenerated fiber | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cellulose | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cellulose nanocrystals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a chitin nanocrystals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reinforcement | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Jin‐Gang |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yuan, Tong‐Qi |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, Run‐Cang |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of applied polymer science |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 |g 134(2017), 22 |w (DE-627)129595799 |w (DE-600)240694-9 |w (DE-576)015088812 |x 0021-8995 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:134 |g year:2017 |g number:22 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.80 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 51.70 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 134 |j 2017 |e 22 | ||
| author_variant |
j c jc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00218995:2017----::oprsnfellsadhtnaorsasorifrigee |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
35.80 51.70 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1002/app.44880 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Chen, Jing‐Huan verfasserin aut Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement Liu, Jin‐Gang oth Yuan, Tong‐Qi oth Sun, Run‐Cang oth Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 134(2017), 22 (DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 0021-8995 nnns volume:134 year:2017 number:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 35.80 AVZ 51.70 AVZ AR 134 2017 22 |
| spelling |
10.1002/app.44880 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Chen, Jing‐Huan verfasserin aut Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement Liu, Jin‐Gang oth Yuan, Tong‐Qi oth Sun, Run‐Cang oth Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 134(2017), 22 (DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 0021-8995 nnns volume:134 year:2017 number:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 35.80 AVZ 51.70 AVZ AR 134 2017 22 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1002/app.44880 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Chen, Jing‐Huan verfasserin aut Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement Liu, Jin‐Gang oth Yuan, Tong‐Qi oth Sun, Run‐Cang oth Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 134(2017), 22 (DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 0021-8995 nnns volume:134 year:2017 number:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 35.80 AVZ 51.70 AVZ AR 134 2017 22 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1002/app.44880 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Chen, Jing‐Huan verfasserin aut Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement Liu, Jin‐Gang oth Yuan, Tong‐Qi oth Sun, Run‐Cang oth Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 134(2017), 22 (DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 0021-8995 nnns volume:134 year:2017 number:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 35.80 AVZ 51.70 AVZ AR 134 2017 22 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1002/app.44880 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Chen, Jing‐Huan verfasserin aut Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement Liu, Jin‐Gang oth Yuan, Tong‐Qi oth Sun, Run‐Cang oth Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959 134(2017), 22 (DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 0021-8995 nnns volume:134 year:2017 number:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 35.80 AVZ 51.70 AVZ AR 134 2017 22 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science 134(2017), 22 volume:134 year:2017 number:22 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of applied polymer science 134(2017), 22 volume:134 year:2017 number:22 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement |
| dewey-raw |
540 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of applied polymer science |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Chen, Jing‐Huan @@aut@@ Liu, Jin‐Gang @@oth@@ Yuan, Tong‐Qi @@oth@@ Sun, Run‐Cang @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129595799 |
| dewey-sort |
3540 |
| id |
OLC1992854521 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1992854521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518172911.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/app.44880</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1992854521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Jing‐Huan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">regenerated fiber</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulose</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulose nanocrystals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chitin nanocrystals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Jin‐Gang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuan, Tong‐Qi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Run‐Cang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of applied polymer science</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">134(2017), 22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129595799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)240694-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015088812</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8995</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:134</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.70</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">134</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Chen, Jing‐Huan |
| spellingShingle |
Chen, Jing‐Huan ddc 540 bkl 35.80 bkl 51.70 misc regenerated fiber misc cellulose misc cellulose nanocrystals misc chitin nanocrystals misc reinforcement Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| authorStr |
Chen, Jing‐Huan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129595799 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0021-8995 |
| topic_title |
540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers regenerated fiber cellulose cellulose nanocrystals chitin nanocrystals reinforcement |
| topic |
ddc 540 bkl 35.80 bkl 51.70 misc regenerated fiber misc cellulose misc cellulose nanocrystals misc chitin nanocrystals misc reinforcement |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 540 bkl 35.80 bkl 51.70 misc regenerated fiber misc cellulose misc cellulose nanocrystals misc chitin nanocrystals misc reinforcement |
| topic_browse |
ddc 540 bkl 35.80 bkl 51.70 misc regenerated fiber misc cellulose misc cellulose nanocrystals misc chitin nanocrystals misc reinforcement |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
j l jl t y ty r s rs |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of applied polymer science |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129595799 |
| dewey-tens |
540 - Chemistry |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of applied polymer science |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129595799 (DE-600)240694-9 (DE-576)015088812 |
| title |
Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1992854521 (DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521 (PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03 (KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf |
| title_full |
Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| author_sort |
Chen, Jing‐Huan |
| journal |
Journal of applied polymer science |
| journalStr |
Journal of applied polymer science |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Chen, Jing‐Huan |
| container_volume |
134 |
| class |
540 DE-600 35.80 bkl 51.70 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Chen, Jing‐Huan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/app.44880 |
| dewey-full |
540 |
| title_sort |
comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| title_auth |
Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| abstract |
In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. |
| abstractGer |
In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
22 |
| title_short |
Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Liu, Jin‐Gang Yuan, Tong‐Qi Sun, Run‐Cang |
| author2Str |
Liu, Jin‐Gang Yuan, Tong‐Qi Sun, Run‐Cang |
| ppnlink |
129595799 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1002/app.44880 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:48:03.203Z |
| _version_ |
1803626304718766080 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1992854521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518172911.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/app.44880</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1992854521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1992854521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c2563-ede0e8dc1fceb6260e8f4acdd0e22269d7224067d9ec17de6a830153d4e6acb03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0117731120170000134002200000comparisonofcelluloseandchitinnanocrystalsforreinf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Jing‐Huan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of cellulose and chitin nanocrystals for reinforcing regenerated cellulose fibers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, regenerated cellulose fibers reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals (CENC) and chitin nanocrystals (CHNC) were prepared by blending the nanocrystals suspensions with the cellulose solution in NaOH/urea/water solvent at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystals' addition on the properties of spinning dopes and regenerated fibers were investigated and compared. Results showed that the obtained CENC and CHNC had different dimensions, and both of them increased the viscosity and decreased the transparency of the spinning dopes. However, the dissolution state of cellulose was not changed. CHNC had a greater influence on the properties of spinning dopes, while CENC had more obvious effect on the performance of regenerated fibers. The CENC reinforced fibers showed a higher crystallinity index as compared to the CHNC reinforced fibers. The tensile strength of the regenerated fibers was evidently improved when 3 wt % CENC or 2 wt % CHNC were added, while the elongation at break of the fibers was slightly decreased with the increase of nanocrystals content. The morphology and thermal stability of the regenerated fibers was not affected by the addition of nanocrystals. This study suggested that the dimension, group and content of nanocrystals were important factors for the reinforcement of regenerated cellulose fibers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134 , 44880.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">regenerated fiber</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulose</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cellulose nanocrystals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">chitin nanocrystals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Jin‐Gang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuan, Tong‐Qi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Run‐Cang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of applied polymer science</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley InterScience, 1959</subfield><subfield code="g">134(2017), 22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129595799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)240694-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015088812</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8995</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:134</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.44880</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.44880/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1874287768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.80</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.70</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">134</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013176 |