A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction
We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state ad...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wolfsteller, René [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of human rights - Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997, 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; pages:219 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1993475877 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1993475877 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215144248.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170721 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1993475877 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a INTRECHT |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wolfsteller, René |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a normative localism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human rights state | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human rights activism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nation state | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a international human rights law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Activism | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gregg, Benjamin |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of human rights |d Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 |g 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 |w (DE-627)216376521 |w (DE-600)1338523-9 |w (DE-576)061012149 |x 1364-2987 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:219 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-INTRECHT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ASS | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_339 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2024 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 219 | ||
| author_variant |
r w rw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13642987:2017----::raitctpartclnlssfhhmnihsttiteradelye |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 doi PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid Wolfsteller, René verfasserin aut A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism Gregg, Benjamin oth Enthalten in International journal of human rights Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 (DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 1364-2987 nnns volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 21 2017 3 219 |
| spelling |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 doi PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid Wolfsteller, René verfasserin aut A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism Gregg, Benjamin oth Enthalten in International journal of human rights Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 (DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 1364-2987 nnns volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 21 2017 3 219 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 doi PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid Wolfsteller, René verfasserin aut A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism Gregg, Benjamin oth Enthalten in International journal of human rights Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 (DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 1364-2987 nnns volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 21 2017 3 219 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 doi PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid Wolfsteller, René verfasserin aut A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism Gregg, Benjamin oth Enthalten in International journal of human rights Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 (DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 1364-2987 nnns volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 21 2017 3 219 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 doi PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid Wolfsteller, René verfasserin aut A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017 normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism Gregg, Benjamin oth Enthalten in International journal of human rights Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 (DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 1364-2987 nnns volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 21 2017 3 219 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of human rights 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of human rights 21(2017), 3, Seite 219 volume:21 year:2017 number:3 pages:219 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of human rights |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wolfsteller, René @@aut@@ Gregg, Benjamin @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
216376521 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1993475877 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1993475877</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215144248.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1993475877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolfsteller, René</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">normative localism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights activism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nation state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international human rights law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Activism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gregg, Benjamin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of human rights</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2017), 3, Seite 219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216376521</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1338523-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)061012149</subfield><subfield code="x">1364-2987</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ASS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">219</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wolfsteller, René |
| spellingShingle |
Wolfsteller, René ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc normative localism misc human rights state misc human rights misc human rights activism misc nation state misc social construction misc Justice misc international human rights law misc Human rights misc Activism A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| authorStr |
Wolfsteller, René |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)216376521 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1364-2987 |
| topic_title |
340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction normative localism human rights state human rights human rights activism nation state social construction Justice international human rights law Human rights Activism |
| topic |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc normative localism misc human rights state misc human rights misc human rights activism misc nation state misc social construction misc Justice misc international human rights law misc Human rights misc Activism |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc normative localism misc human rights state misc human rights misc human rights activism misc nation state misc social construction misc Justice misc international human rights law misc Human rights misc Activism |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 fid INTRECHT misc normative localism misc human rights state misc human rights misc human rights activism misc nation state misc social construction misc Justice misc international human rights law misc Human rights misc Activism |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
b g bg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of human rights |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
216376521 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of human rights |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)216376521 (DE-600)1338523-9 (DE-576)061012149 |
| title |
A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1993475877 (DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877 (PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060 (KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta |
| title_full |
A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| author_sort |
Wolfsteller, René |
| journal |
International journal of human rights |
| journalStr |
International journal of human rights |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
219 |
| author_browse |
Wolfsteller, René |
| container_volume |
21 |
| class |
340 DE-600 INTRECHT fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wolfsteller, René |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
realistic utopia? critical analyses of the human rights state in theory and deployment: guest editors' introduction |
| title_auth |
A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| abstract |
We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. |
| abstractGer |
We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-INTRECHT SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-ASS GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_339 GBV_ILN_2024 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Gregg, Benjamin |
| author2Str |
Gregg, Benjamin |
| ppnlink |
216376521 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:39:33.749Z |
| _version_ |
1803569147409334272 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1993475877</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215144248.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170512s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1993475877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1993475877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1424-778cfe020fbefd01a64540ffcf398e5c11b230677236d279cdbc2ee3eb517060</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0322214420170000021000300219realisticutopiacriticalanalysesofthehumanrightssta</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">INTRECHT</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolfsteller, René</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A realistic utopia? Critical analyses of The Human Rights State in theory and deployment: Guest editors' introduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We introduce this special issue on Benjamin Gregg's recent theory of a human rights state by contextualising it within current human rights scholarship and explicating its core claims, before we provide an overview of the eight contributions. We argue that the concept of a human rights state addresses two interrelated problems within human rights research by bridging the significant disconnect in the literature between human rights theory and practice. First, it conceives human rights as socially constructed norms whose reach and validity are historically contingent, depending on their free embrace and effective implementation by their local addressees. In this way it dispenses with the ever fruitless, even counterproductive attempts to advance human rights by claims about their putative, ultimate normative foundation. Second, it overcomes the limitations and failures of the top-down, generally unenforceable international human rights regime with a bottom-up alternative: the human rights state as a metaphorical polity in which activists promote human rights-friendly change within the corresponding nation state. In each case of such a metaphorical polity, a network of self-selected activists within the nation state promotes the free embrace of self-authored human rights through incorporating those rights in the nation state's legal and political system. Subsequently, aspirations to an international human rights law would finally be redeemed as effective norms through the overlapping agreement among more and more political communities that have freely embraced their self-authored human rights and institutionalised them at local levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">normative localism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights activism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nation state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international human rights law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Activism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gregg, Benjamin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of human rights</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2017), 3, Seite 219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216376521</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1338523-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)061012149</subfield><subfield code="x">1364-2987</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642987.2017.1298729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1882481714</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-INTRECHT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ASS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">219</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3985224 |